Nintendo looks like they emphasized GPU over CPU, why do you think Sony wouldn't?
Even if they emphasize the GPU more (which they likely will), that doesn't mean that their CPU will be lackluster.
I'm almost certain that Sony is not building a 35 Watt system.
Here is the thing people are forgetting,
Nintendo found a way to basically create an incredible lag free signal between the gamepad, console and TV. Who is to say that Nintendo and partners have not come up with something special for the memory?
You know what says that? Logic. The chips they are using are readily available on the market and their specifications are well known. If, by some remote chance, someone had come up with a magical hardware way to get more performance out of DDR3, a Nintendo console wouldn't be the first you hear about it.
But not faster than Cell, a 7 year old CPU !!11!!!.
Not so fond of info like that when it's aimed at Sony instead of Nintendo are you lol...
Sony better get PS4 right, it looks like it may well be their last console.
Your posts are embarrassing.
That didn't stop sony from hyping up the Cell as the most powerful CPU ever created, while most developers were fairly clueless about what to even put on the SPEs
Cell is a very intelligently designed, extremely efficient architecture. How forward-looking it was can be seen by the fact that heterogenous accelerator-based computing is now
the main driving force in HPC. It's just based mostly on GPUs now, but the principle is extremely similar.
It's harder to program, but going with a hard to program but efficient architecture paid off for Sony with PS2. With PS3, they learned that they cannot count on that when they are not the market leader. Which leads to the (rumoured) PS4 decisions.