That's what he's saying I think, although I haven't read the whole exchange. People were mad that it was implied the switch didn't have the resources to handle voice chat, and people snapped back with "the vita could do it, why would you think the switch couldn't?" It's not that it couldn't, it's that it could possibly be that it can't because how Nintendo allotted the resources.
What do you think they will say? They wont say anything simply because they did not prioritize voice chat.
They already have those.
Messages -> Options -> Privacy Settings -> Set to Friends Only
Assuming that's the type of spam you're talking about.
do you realize that xbox 360 had 512mb of RAM and still provided build in voice chat?
so 512 MB FREE for the switch OS when running a game is a fucking lot.
Good point. The iPhone 7 doesn't have an audio jack.How is Nintendo supposed to sell you an app and an adapter?
As an aside, iPhone 7 or a new flagship Android phone + docked mode Switch is going to be a level of cord and dongle hell that is comical to think about.
Hmm. OK. Would that really take that much battery power?
I do not understand how Nintendo just doesn't release a phone-holding JoyCon grip like this with all the functionality build into the unit. Maybe there would be a couple short weird 3.5 mm male-male cords but it wouldn't be a monstrosity.
![]()
'we fucked up :/'
oh i know, but i have never bought got one before, and since i'll probably be picking this dumb thing up it might have more uses for me.
I get that other consoles have a superior method and use it regularly, but this simply changes my usage case from plugging headphones into a controller to now plugging headphones into a phone. Other than that I'll use it in the same way as can anybody else. It's not such a radically different approach to warrant so much outrage imo.
Nintendo expects Switch owners to already have a smartphone.
Shortsighted? Forward thinking? Either way downloading an app in 2017 is not 'far more effort'
The biggest problem is that batteries in bluetooth headphones are generally very very small. An additional audio processor wouldn't use a lot of power for sure but there isn't much available to begin with.
Still though, my point is that it's much more complicated and expensive than a wired adaptor. It's certainly possible to make though, it's just not as simple as the wired version and as such would have a smaller potential market.
I can picture some premium style large over the ear headsets existing though where there's space for a larger battery and people are already willing to pay a bit more
The biggest problem is that batteries in bluetooth headphones are generally very very small. An additional audio processor wouldn't use a lot of power for sure but there isn't much available to begin with.
Still though, my point is that it's much more complicated and expensive than a wired adaptor. It's certainly possible to make though, it's just not as simple as the wired version and as such would have a smaller potential market.
I can picture some premium style large over the ear headsets existing though where there's space for a larger battery and people are already willing to pay a bit more
As someone who does not use online chat, or indeed headphones very often, could someone explain to me: Is there a good reason why we couldn't just use, like, these...?
![]()
do you realize that xbox 360 had 512mb of RAM and still provided build in voice chat?
so 512 MB FREE for the switch OS when running a game is a fucking lot.
That's what he's saying I think, although I haven't read the whole exchange. People were mad that it was implied the switch didn't have the resources to handle voice chat, and people snapped back with "the vita could do it, why would you think the switch couldn't?" It's not that it couldn't, it's that it could possibly be that it can't because how Nintendo allotted the resources.
Not off the top of my head. I just remember rumblings early on about games having access to something like 3.5 GB of the system's memory. That doesn't leave much overhead for everything else. People then made further deductions based on the barebones-ass OS and the fact that many functions were being offloaded to a smartphone. I don't think we have any hard confirmation on any of this, but I could be wrong.
I mean, I'm not arguing that it's better. It was shortsighted as fuck, but this is the decision they presumably made. Now we're stuck dealing with it.
The responsiveness of the Xbox 360 UI would not be acceptable for a mobile device in 2017. Hell, the Xbox One's wouldn't eitherand that OS has significantly more resources allocated to it.
But you only need the controller on other consoles and you need both the controller and your phone on switch. Is not a radical difference but is a way worse method to provide voice chat and deserves all the outrage of the world.
Now as to why it's not the default setting...
This is what I was picturing would be used by going into a phone along with the Switch. All to facilitate whatever supposed benefit the app might have brought. (Which I realize is just a big question mark right now.)
I was willing to see how adding a phone to the equation might work, but adding the squid adapter thing as well is too many things in my book.
Nintendo really needs to come forward and explain how this is all supposed to work.
This is what I was picturing would be used by going into a phone along with the Switch. All to facilitate whatever supposed benefit the app might have brought. (Which I realize is just a big question mark right now.)
I was willing to see how adding a phone to the equation might work, but adding the squid adapter thing as well is too many things in my book.
Nintendo really needs to come forward and explain how this is all supposed to work.
Before anyone gets too angry about this:
Nintendo is a family oriented company, and the last time they allowed a direct communication tool in their systems -Swapnote- paedophiles started sending dick to kids.
They want to not be responsible for any bad behavior from the users, and since they don't want for their service to turn into an endless screaming, swearing, racist galore, they count on YOUR smartphone.
Ultimately it's customers fault for being assholes online, don't blame Nintendo
Actually Reggie might say something about it soon or at E3 but it will be some PR stuff that you guys will take way too serious and definitive
Why are you doing this
There is no excuse.
Go read the rest of them and you tell me how they even make a lick of senseHow is an official statement from the president of Nintendo of America not supposed to be taken seriously or definitive?
I'm not making excuses. Just providing explanations.
The argument that "if the Vita could do it the Switch could too!" presumably doesn't work because of decisions that were made long before the Switch actually launched. There's nothing that can be done about it now if that is indeed what happened.
I'm not making excuses. Just providing explanations.
The argument that "if the Vita could do it the Switch could too!" presumably doesn't work because of decisions that were made long before the Switch actually laundhed. There's nothing that can be done about it now if that is indeed what happened.
Hey, at least it's not a shitty solution that you also have to pay for to a problem that shouldn't exist to being with ¯\_(ツ_/¯
How is an official statement from the president of Nintendo of America not supposed to be taken seriously or definitive?
How is an official statement from the president of Nintendo of America not supposed to be taken seriously or definitive?
Go read the rest of them and you tell me how they even make a lick of sense
HORI branded...
It's not an official thing guys.
My hope is that this obnoxious set up is specifically for portable mode chat and that the docked version will have a more elegant (read: standard) approach to voice chat.
That being said, while I will not be using this set up under any circumstances, I am seriously considering buying that slick looking headset if the quality proves to be decent.
When you make a basic feature needlessly complex, it's a big deal. We would have the same thread if this were a Sony or Microsoft product.
Bullshit
They could get this working regardless of the resource allocation. I dont buy that logic for a second
dudeee, the squid adapter is not by nintendo, is an addon from hori, so you can hear the game and the audiochat on the headphones.
what's confusing about how this is supposed to work? the picture in the OP seems pretty clear
How it would limit griefing or protect kids? Every kid in the world has a smartphone these days...
Until they start charging for itAt least the online is free.
Until they start charging for it