Kssio_Aug
Member
Congrats to you, meanwhile Sony is still outselling the competition.
That's nice for them. But I don't give a damn.
Congrats to you, meanwhile Sony is still outselling the competition.
You guys have some weird sexual fantasies.This is wrong and I criticize Sony for doing it...but.
When I first heard this I just BUSTED out into laughter. I just imagined this is how it went.
*Phil Spencer walks up to Shuhei.*
Phil: H-Hey Shu-Shuhei...uhm...
Shuhei: Look me in the eyes when you speak to me.
Phil: S-Sorry Yoshida-san. Will...uhm, would Sony like to-
Shuhei: Look me in the eyes Mr. Spencer. LOOK..............
*awkward silence as well as a death stare showdown, but obviously it's one sided*
No.
*Shuhei slaps Phil across the face and Phil runs off crying, in the process of him running away and crying we hear:*
Phil: I'm SORRRRRRY!
That's nice for them. But I don't give a damn.
This is wrong and I criticize Sony for doing it...but.
When I first heard this I just BUSTED out into laughter. I just imagined this is how it went.
*Phil Spencer walks up to Shuhei.*
Phil: H-Hey Shu-Shuhei...uhm...
Shuhei: Look me in the eyes when you speak to me.
Phil: S-Sorry Yoshida-san. Will...uhm, would Sony like to-
Shuhei: Look me in the eyes Mr. Spencer. LOOK..............
*awkward silence as well as a death stare showdown, but obviously it's one sided*
No.
*Shuhei slaps Phil across the face and Phil runs off crying, in the process of him running away and crying we hear:*
Phil: I'm SORRRRRRY!
I am part of their audience. And if they knew me,I think Sony knows their audience better than we do.
some are happy sure some like me, again, are not. to me sony didn't allow EA access because it would have been competing with psnow, not because they say it's not a good service for their consumers.Some people are happy of sony protecting their platform from bad business practives like EA Access. Other are happy with them not investing in BC because they don't seem to care about it. Now some people doesn't need this feature. I think Sony is doing great job satisfying their audience. Thankfully MS and Nintendo are doing the same with the oppsosite decisions.
I'm pretty sure that's sarcasm.
I think Sony knows their audience better than we do. Some people are happy of sony protecting their platform from bad business practives like EA Access. Other are happy with them not investing in BC because they don't seem to care about it. Now some people doesn't need this feature. I think Sony is doing great job satisfying their audience. Thankfully MS and Nintendo are doing the same with the oppsosite decisions.
that's the very defintion if arrogance. " our fans will still buy our games so we can continue being anti consumer"That's my point they don't give a damn about this because it will not change sales in any significant way, that's not arrogance that just business.
You don't, but I do. One of my best friends from college plays Minecraft on Xbox; hell, I first played and discovered the game by playing it with him on 360 way back in the day. And here came the opportunity to finally play online with him, and the opportunity is not even there.Again, I think they should enable cross-platform play, but I lose absolutely nothing by them not doing it.
lol xDPlease source your /v/ quotes
Smells like bullshit.
Fanboys must have their time on the podium.People have literally been claiming that Sony is protecting us by not allowing EA Access since the beginning.
Congrats to you, meanwhile Sony is still outselling the competition.
LOL. I knew this was coming. I really don't know why this popped into my head but OBVIOUSLY it's cause I'm a fanboy. Love it.
That's my point they don't give a damn about this because it will not change sales in any significant way, that's not arrogance that just business.
I mean, yeah? What you want powerful hardware, pay up.
I think Sony knows their audience better than we do. Some people are happy of sony protecting their platform from bad business practives like EA Access. Other are happy with them not investing in BC because they don't seem to care about it. Now some people doesn't need this feature. I think Sony is doing great job satisfying their audience. Thankfully MS and Nintendo are doing the same with the oppsosite decisions.
Your posts are terrible and you both should feel terrible.
Here's a post of mine from 2013 tearing Microsoft a new asshole for being anti-consumer and arrogant.
Having to drag some Kinect with you and point it at you and calibrate it, just to play a freaking game (imagine this at LAN parties, EVO, PAX, etc.), is not simple.
Having to enter a serial code for every game is not simple.
Having to be online just to play games is not simple.
Some weird-ass trade-in system that involves people revoking permissions to play and generating/selling new 'offline pass' stuff is not simple.
Clear market leaders have no incentive to support interoperability.
I swear shit like this makes me ashamed to own a Pro and a PSVR. The fanboyism makes me wish to not be identified with Playstation owners lest people think me a sycophant.
Sony isn't protecting me from shit by preventing me from subbing to EA Access.
I am not fucking happy that Sony won't let me play games on the PS4 that I've already bought from them two or three times on other platforms.
I am their fucking audience. I spend thousands on each platform they release.
I think I shouldn't generalize but it's bafling to see how some people in other threads are eager to defend this kind of practices we consider positive for all consumers.I am part of their audience. And if they knew me,
they would have allowed crossplay.some are happy sure some like me, again, are not. to me sony didn't allow EA access because it would have been competing with psnow, not because they say it's not a good service for their consumers.
prohibiting crossplay is not a good move on behalf of their consumers
Congrats to you, meanwhile Sony is still outselling the competition.
News like this don't make me sad because I expect big companies to start acting like complete assholes as soon as they gain the upper hand. What truly saddens me is the legion of platform warriors who will rush to defend any decision not matter how shitty or anti-consumer it is.
I should feel terrible..when you are comparing this
To denying cross console play?
When I think of anti-consumer, I think of your orginal post..MUCH MORE so than cross console play, especially when it's still allowed with PC Gamers.
lol yeah, lets forget all the great games that were realeased on the PS4 this year, while MS had what exactly? Fanboys crack me up.
I mean you have a fucking Yakuza avatar, a game that is only on the PS4.
Yeah, the EA access thing is stretching it for sure. As far as minecraft goes , this is more of an issue with connecting with XBL rather than Sony being arrogant .MS has the same problem with Final Fantasy 14 , where it's no problem with PS4 connecting with PC players ( as well as other games ) ..People have literally been claiming that Sony is protecting us by not allowing EA Access since the beginning.
Do you play Minecraft on PS4?
Bad strategy when you and your friends can play on your tablet/pc/phone. Given which platforms the majority of people play Minecraft on, chances are one of these options will be the better route.
OTHER THAN, in this case, making sure their version of the world's biggest video game isn't gimped into the least attractive version by a mileClear market leaders have no incentive to support interoperability.
Does it ever, really?Being a corporate lickspittle will do you no good here.
Do the people defending this even own Sony stock? Why defend a company unless you are invested in it?
So it truly doesn't matter to you. Perfectly fair. There's tons of people playing Minecraft who crossplay is relevant to, fwiw. Families, young classmates. Disparate online communities that can bridge for the first time. And so on.I do. But none of my friends own XBO's, so. To each their own, I guess. =
I do. But none of my friends own XBO's, so. To each their own, I guess. =\
So it truly doesn't apply to you. Fair. There's tons of people playing Minecraft who crossplay is relevant to, fwiw. Families, young classmates. Disparate online communities that can bridge for the first time. And so on.
Someone at Sony is probably reading this thread as we speakIt's so confusing. Sony doesn't even know they exist...
You're reaching really hard with trying to defend this. It's anti-consumer, plain and simple.
I understand that's business for them, but if they could accept their consumer demands (and people want cross play) that could end up well for them in the long run. They market their console as #4thegamers, they started this gen saying they're doing things for the gamers when MS did not, and now they're the ones limiting their gamers.
They're the market leader now, but in the market we never know when things can turn upside down.
Edit: By the way, just to be clear, I am not saying Sony is the only one not listening to demands they should. This E3 MS has shown a very similar attitude by not bringing new IPs, but that's discussion for another thread.
"It makes me smart"But where is the demand though? How many people will really be asking for this? Where are the petitions? Where is this a big deal other than GAF? They don't care unless it hurts their bottom line.
People have literally been claiming that Sony is protecting us by not allowing EA Access since the beginning.
This decision has no upsides for Sony and just makes Minecraft on PS4 the poorest option for playing the game moving forward. It's not the world's biggest issue for Sony, but it shouldn't be like pulling teeth to get some of you to acknowledge that it's still a shitty move to make - for the existing PS4 Minecraft players and for the future viability of the world's biggest game on the leading console platform as well.But where is the demand though? How many people will really be asking for this? Where are the petitions? Where is this a big deal other than GAF? They don't care unless it hurts their bottom line.