GreenLiquid
Neo Member
Sakurai said the first priority of Smash 4 was drafting the roster.
The roster was initially drafted in February 2012, following the completion of KIU
Now the leak listed XY Pokemon and Chrom. This part of the leak was from the same snapshot in time, meaning Chrom was on the list at the same time a reserved XY Pokemon rep was. We already know Sakurai confirmed that XY reserved a rep for a period of time, and when Greninja was chosen, he didnt even have a name, and was based off of concept art.
The next major part is Chrom. Sakurai said he initially considered Chrom, but chose Robin AFTER he played FEA. Well, FEA came out in April 2012. 2 months after the roster was drafted.
The pieces fit far too well.
The problem I have with that is that it accepts as a premise that the roster was finalized in February, then takes as another premise that it wasn't actually finalized in February because something changed later because the leak was wrong. If that one exception is allowed, why not others? Maybe the roster being "finalized" isn't as exact as we might like to think. After all, Brawl got outright delayed for a late character addition to its roster.
EDIT:
The Great Gonzales said:Yes, but at that point, we're arguing about something that's impossible to prove one way or the other, so what's the point? It's like the Palutena pic: it may have been fake, or it may have been a real-but-old pic, and model was just slightly altered after the fact. There's no way for us to know, so we call it a draw. It's the same thing with the Gematsu leak. If it turns out to be mostly right, then we likely won't be able to finally determine whether it was a true leak or a guess.
That's very true. I'm only making the distinction because I've seen people conflate people disbelieving the leak with people saying that the things predicted by the leak are factually false even if they're likely otherwise. But you're right, we're unlikely to ever know even if a leak turns out to be a completely wild guess.