Anton Sugar
Member
What is this from?
Age of Uprising. It's not great, but Mads is.
![hgnf6pj.gif](http://i.imgur.com/hgnf6pj.gif)
What is this from?
Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that it takes placeafter the invasion has already succeeded? Nilfgaard basically controls the North at this point, I think.
Age of Uprising. It's not great, but Mads is.
![]()
I respectfully disagree; and you're not making a case why they shouldn't. I think you are expecting too much from the audience. As a basis for comparison, not everyone needs to know when a scene doesn't work in a movie because a producer decided that the film's budget needed to be cut, for example.
My goal is to judge the end result, not dabble into the behind the curtain stuff.
Behind the curtain stuff gives me a better impression of the end result personally. Say someone cooked a full course meal for me, and without any other information given, I eat it, find it to be so-so. Say instead that person told me they cooked that meal in 10 minutes with only 3 ingredients, I'd be far more impressed. It's just an arbitrary analogy but my point is background information helps with impression.I respectfully disagree; and you're not making a case why they shouldn't. I think you are expecting too much from the audience. As a basis for comparison, not everyone needs to know when a scene doesn't work in a movie because a producer decided that the film's budget needed to be cut, for example.
My goal is to judge the end result, not dabble into the behind the curtain stuff.
If you mean for faces, it's because of money. Way too expensive for an RPG that size and the development budget they have. According to what they say anyway.Why wouldn't they use motion capture? Any source?
Never heard of Gamersyde?When are we getting a good video website that do not compress these videos?
what? if anything there's too much blood.The lack of blood or sign of injury is only an overlooked details, for a side quest character.
That wind has me pining for a Mads-starring Witcher movie again.
![]()
![]()
That wind has me pining for a Mads-starring Witcher movie again.
![]()
![]()
There's another major reason. They have a LOT of different languages for their audio, so mocapping for only one vocal performance wouldn't match all of the others that would have different emphasis on different words.If you mean for faces, it's because of money. Way too expensive for an RPG that size and the development budget they have. According to what they say anyway.
The animations look awful.
I'm NOT referring to the facial / convo stuff...but the running and combat. Kind of weird having poor running animations in an open world game...and a third person one to boot.
Lol, everyone in this thread is arguing about the most petty, surface level shit.
This game looks stunning. Just incredible.
What I am more concerned about is the combat.
It just doesn't look very.... deep.
That wind has me pining for a Mads-starring Witcher movie again.
![]()
![]()
Not worthy of PhotshopGAF but still
![]()
What the hell? People are complaining on the facial animations in this game? Are you crazy? Show me better facial animations in a RPG with more than 800 NPCs.. and even when it comes to videogames, they look fantastic.. LA Noire was praised for it, but in that game they went overboard with it - it looked goofy and silly.. but here, it looks atleast normal
Yeah, dodging and rolling are 2 separate buttons in this one.That reminds me, can Geralt combat roll in this game?
I remember doing this some months ago for the movie-posters thread:
Behind the curtain stuff gives me a better impression of the end result personally. Say someone cooked a full course meal for me, and without any other information given, I eat it, find it to be so-so. Say instead that person told me they cooked that meal in 10 minutes with only 3 ingredients, I'd be far more impressed. It's just an arbitrary analogy but my point is background information helps with impression.
I just don't look at it as black and white as you or some others, that's all. We can agree to disagree though, it's no biggie.
Yeah, dodging and rolling are 2 separate buttons in this one.
I love how CDPR can take the "evil empire" of nilfgaurd and humanize them with this little quest. It's something they have always done. What initially seems like a simple decision has an important impact. Its not like there is a good or bad decision either, but both decisions have negative and positive impacts. CDPR is awesome at gray morality.
I give it points for all the extra effort but the quest just came off cheesy to me the way it played out. If it had been an ambush by bandits after Geralt discovers the obvious lies while standing waist deep in a swamp then I would think it was a good side quest.
Some guy making up a big lie that is immediately apparent all to try and trick a WITCHER into doing a fetch quest?
had no idea the console versions were 60fps
In game footage provided by CD Projekt Red, captured on a PC.
I give it points for all the extra effort but the quest just came off cheesy to me the way it played out. If it had been an ambush by bandits after Geralt discovers the obvious lies while standing waist deep in a swamp then I would think it was a good side quest.
Some guy making up a big lie that is immediately apparent all to try and trick a WITCHER into doing a fetch quest?
I give it points for all the extra effort but the quest just came off cheesy to me the way it played out. If it had been an ambush by bandits after Geralt discovers the obvious lies while standing waist deep in a swamp then I would think it was a good side quest.
Some guy making up a big lie that is immediately apparent all to try and trick a WITCHER into doing a fetch quest?
Looks like The Rock could also play that role.
Age of Uprising. It's not great, but Mads is.
![]()
Mads would be fucking glorious Geralt. HBO should wrap up GoT already so they can move on filming the Witcher novels with Mads. I would even sacrifice brilliant Hannibal for that.
Mads would be fucking glorious Geralt. HBO should wrap up GoT already so they can move on filming the Witcher novels with Mads. I would even sacrifice brilliant Hannibal for that.
Damn, what happened to the dynamic meditation that showed the time of the day changing around Geralt. Everyone who saw the game last year talked about it, because it was so damn impressive. Downgrade?
You mean the same meditation which was there in TW2 and worked on 360?
Are you asking if that feature is in The Witcher 3?I haven't seen it.
Open world games usually do have a way of advancing time. It doesn't necessarily have to be the exact same method that was in The Witcher 2.
Rock Paper Shotgun said:Earlier we’d seen Geralt meditate, and watched as the sky rolled around, and the weather transformed in accelerated time. It’s hardly a surprise when big budget games look incredible, these days, but moments like that nevertheless grasped me by the eyeballs.
RPGSite said:In The Witcher, Geralt can meditate to pass time, and in that, you see a time lapse, the sky moving. Initially it was that rotating texture, but it was really in your face. I said no, no, we've got to make something better than this. I'm going to make sure that we have a nice panning sky that actually travels. The sky composes the image, in an artistic sense.