Matt Attack
Member
I'm really glad to see this reviewing so well. I'm not always confident in my puzzle solving abilities, but I want to give this game my all.
So, how hard is it?
I'm really interested in it (it really looks amazing) but I'm also afraid of just getting super frustrated all the time.
The IGN review makes it seem like the game does a good job of teaching you it's mechanics but it still might end up being super complicated.
So, how hard is it?
I'm really interested in it (it really looks amazing) but I'm also afraid of just getting super frustrated all the time.
The IGN review makes it seem like the game does a good job of teaching you it's mechanics but it still might end up being super complicated.
Frankly, I think I might hate The Witness. Even after hours of playtime, I dont know enough to tell.
There are some bright spots. I found a way to travel to various parts of the island quickly, offering some perspective on the structure of the place. Ive made some headway, here and there, on some truly difficult puzzles. In some places, it seems that Im on the precipice of a real discovery.
The Witness has yet to offer me any reasons to expect that my faith will be rewarded, however. Ive found a couple of audio logs, that new standby of videogame narratives. Theyve all been near ships, which I think might be important.
Upon activation, all theyve offered are famous videogame voice actors reading the words of philosophers and poets. Thought experiments. Eulogies. More questions.
In the silence of the island, I can almost hear The Witness laughing at me.
Antichamber goty 2013. still love it to death.
when can I buy the witness on PSN??
Antichamber goty 2013. still love it to death.
when can I buy the witness on PSN??
I'm really glad to see this reviewing so well. I'm not always confident in my puzzle solving abilities, but I want to give this game my all.
Pre-loads may be a thing after all for Steam:
![]()
Cool beans. Has he mentioned anything regarding having the release date pushed forward from 10am PT?
It looks like the recommended gpu is a 780. For those who are smarter than me, does that mean my 660 should be ok? By "ok" I mean not playing on low settings?
It looks like the recommended gpu is a 780. For those who are smarter than me, does that mean my 660 should be ok? By "ok" I mean not playing on low settings?
I was wondering the same thing, as I have a 7870.It looks like the recommended gpu is a 780. For those who are smarter than me, does that mean my 660 should be ok? By "ok" I mean not playing on low settings?
if you want impressions without any spoilers, I recommend listening to but not watching the giant bomb quick look. Jeff plays it fresh and works through stuff without explicitly narrating every move so it works well.
If the game really does build up on what you learn then watching the opening moments of the game would be like 'spoiling' a tutorial section. Who cares?
Silly question, Im sure there are are plenty of people crazy enough to care. Yall need to get a grip on spoilers.
Blow has said that opening tutorial section has more than it seems.If the game really does build up on what you learn then watching the opening moments of the game would be like 'spoiling' a tutorial section. Who cares?
Silly question, Im sure there are are plenty of people crazy enough to care. Yall need to get a grip on spoilers.
Really wish there was a physical release of this.
If the game really does build up on what you learn then watching the opening moments of the game would be like 'spoiling' a tutorial section. Who cares?
Silly question, Im sure there are are plenty of people crazy enough to care. Yall need to get a grip on spoilers.
Yeah, I'm waiting myself. Not big on the digital front.Really wish there was a physical release of this.
If I'm generally not that great at puzzle games (got stuck multiple times in portal 2 and most people here say it's super easy) should I avoid this? The last thing i want is to get frustrated at a puzzle i cant solve and rage quit. I really want to play this since there's so much positive buzz but all the talk of the puzzles being hard are making me second guess buying it.
There's a lot to figure out depending on the sequence in question, and a lot of the game's beauty is in its teaching systems, which can be ruined by one person on the couch going "oh duh this is so obvious" and taking that a-ha moment away from the other person.
Everything seems to be a spoiler these days.
Also, can anyone confirm that Witness has "themes" like in Talos Principle?
Because in Talos Principle, new mechanics for puzzles were introduced progressively, and I'm guessing Witness will too?
Well, if there's guidance and context, it's not really obtuse![]()
Trying to decide if this is something I could get the wife to play, which would decide whether I go PS4 or PC.
I'll probably do PS4 then double dip when I good PC deal presents itself.
Wow. I grade programs and have a much harder time than that at comping up with a grading system which achieves all the goals of being fair, clear, meaningful and representative. I'd imagine grading something as nebulous as an essay to be hell.I sometimes deal with this with university students when they come ask me about my grades. I don't go into these details, but the truth is, I could give their papers to any other professor, and they'd get the same letter grade. It's not difficult when you're only dealing with a few categories: A, B, C, D, F. Two less than what I proposed earlier for games. An 'A' paper is quite clear to anyone in my field (philosophy). It's well written, well argued, no fallacious arguments, and it presents a novel position. A 'B' paper may not have any issues, but it could stand a number of improvements in either exposition, exploring objections, and so forth. A 'C' paper has some problems. It may contain some fallacious arguments, or may display misunderstandings. But it was a well intended attempt. A 'D' paper was probably not well intended, or if it was, it displays serious issues. An 'F' paper is just atrocious and has no redeeming qualities.