elrechazado
Banned
3ds is being marketed stupidly by nintendo as simply another, much more expensive, iteration of the DS. Get a new font nintendo.
TheNatural said:$250 is too much for the mass market to put up ridiculous sales, no matter what's in it, I'm sorry. Our economy is in the fucking shitter, unemployment is high, and hell - thanks to politics everything period may come crashing down in a few weeks. Yet Sony and Nintendo want us to plop out, including tax or shipping, around $300 plus for a handheld game system and a game?
Not worth it. It's ridiculous, and I don't care what's in the damn system, Vita is no more of a deal because it looks better. It's still $300 to play A game. Both need a few well placed cold slaps in the face for this kind of pricing. Whatever happened to Nintendo's old mantra of value pricing?
AceBandage said:It died when the iPod Touch came out.
TheNatural said:I don't think the Ipod has anything to do with it. If people want an MP3 player, they buy an iPod, it still hasn't replaced game systems. Look at what the good old original DS did last month, a cool 386,000 systems sold. This with no new releases and basically a "legacy" system now. And why? The price. That's the only reason. Ipod hasn't killed shit, but it's blatantly obvious unless it IS an iPod or smartphone, no one is going to be chucking out a shitload to buy a handheld device. Get it under $200 where the DS cleaned up at, and things will be fine. No one wants to spend $300 to play a fucking game.
AceBandage said:Post post was in reference to what happened to Nintendo's pricing for value.
It died when Apple sold billions of iPod Touches for $400.
TheNatural said:I don't think the Ipod has anything to do with it. If people want an MP3 player, they buy an iPod, it still hasn't replaced game systems. Look at what the good old original DS did last month, a cool 386,000 systems sold. This with no new releases and basically a "legacy" system now. And why? The price. That's the only reason. Ipod hasn't killed shit, but it's blatantly obvious unless it IS an iPod or smartphone, no one is going to be chucking out a shitload to buy a handheld device. Get it under $200 where the DS cleaned up at, and things will be fine. No one wants to spend $300 to play a fucking game.
AceBandage said:Post post was in reference to what happened to Nintendo's pricing for value.
It died when Apple sold billions of iPod Touches for $400.
Nintendo president Satoru Iwata explained the reasons behind the premium price point. He said one of the most important factors was the positive reaction to the handheld at "a public showing in June," presumably referring to its unveiling at this year's Electronic Entertainment Expo. When asked if the price was too high, he said the company felt that the handheld would still sell well despite its relatively high cost.
Not gunna cut it. As long as it has DS in the name it will be forever linked to its predecessor.elrechazao said:3ds is being marketed stupidly by nintendo as simply another, much more expensive, iteration of the DS. Get a new font nintendo.
24FrameDaVinci said:Not gunna cut it. As long as it has DS in the name it will be forever linked to its predecessor.
Special J said:ya kinda like the playstation 3 right.
AceBandage said:Or the Xbox 720.
Of the GameBoy Advanced.
The name isn't the problem.
The problem is that it hasn't differentiated itself enough yet.
AlexMeloche said:Isn't the 3DS selling better than the first DS was in its time? :/
Shinobi has been moved into once of the most crowded months in the history of gaming.madmaxx350 said:Shinobi and Crush3d have been delayed
http://www.joystiq.com/2011/07/19/shinobi-and-crush3d-delay3d/
Ken said:Nope, but Mercenaries and SSFIV have given me close to 160 hours of playtime on my 3DS so I don't feel as troubled by the lack of games.
SmokyDave said:Let's retitle this topic "List Famous Nintendo Franchises From The Past 20 Years" because that's pretty much all that's gonna happen in here.
BurntPork said:Shinobi has been moved into once of the most crowded months in the history of gaming.
![]()
Magic Ovaries said:Nice reasoning for the high price.
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6280301/rapt-e3-reception-behind-high-3ds-price-report
Duxxy3 said:
TheNatural said:Yup I remember that. They overestimated the positive response. Hopefully they learned their lesson for the Wii U launch. I think there was a components breakdown of the cost of the 3DS and it was around $100 or so in materials, so they're making bank on each one they sell. No "3 years until profitability" stuff like Vita.
AceBandage said:Technically, yes.
Not counting the initial holiday (when the DS launched) the 3DS is tracking ahead.
Duxxy3 said:
Duxxy3 said:So... it's not. Can't take away units because it managed to make it in time for holidays.
Then you can't make any sort of fair comparison until March of next year.Duxxy3 said:So... it's not. Can't take away units because it managed to make it in time for holidays.
phosphor112 said:I doubt you've put that much time into those two games combined so quickly.
Sennorin said:- As for the rest, I DEMAND a big announcement from Square Enix.
MH3DS would require the fucking claw.immortal-joe said:You guys would have a much easier time doing a doom and gloom routine on ANY other system, but not a Nintendo handheld.
I personally am waiting for the VITA, but once these bad boys release:
New Mario / Mario Kart and/or tennis, soccer, water ski, model building....etc
Pokemon
Inevitable deal with Capcom about Monster Hunters (given that 3 was on the Wii)
GAME.....OVER
Buy Elite Beat Agents.Reclaimer said:Played, but never owned a DS. Bought a 3DS when OoT3D released, and have logged over 100 hours on the system so far. Zelda, Mercs, Shantae, Layton, FF Tactics, NSMB... I'm in heaven right now. Hell, even Find Me is a neat little diversion.
Even without the DS stuff, I've more than got my moneys worth. Very pleased, and looking forward to the next year.
CoffeeJanitor said:MH3DS would require the fucking claw.
Please no.
I guess. That would still be really uncomfortable, though.Nuclear Muffin said:No it wouldn't. All they would need to do is add touch screen buttons for the camera (Worked very well in Super Mario 64 DS)
So long as they would be touch screen buttons (like in SM64DS) and not a virtual stick, we'd be sorted! (remember, Monster Hunter uses digital controls for its camera anyway - analog stick or not)
CoffeeJanitor said:I guess. That would still be really uncomfortable, though.
Just put that series on Vita and call it a day.
CoffeeJanitor said:I guess. That would still be really uncomfortable, though.
Just put that series on Vita and call it a day.
Lord Error said:Bottomline is, I have to wonder how many people tried the 3DS and after the initial seconds of enthusiasm, experienced everything I did, and left feeling a bit bummed about it.
JosephManderley said:In Japan I think the earthquake really de-railed the launch. Nintendo pulled advertising for a while, games were delayed, and the initial hype an momentum was lost. Now things have settled down over there a bit, the sales numbers are slowly starting to pick up.