And the ultra textures for this game is an optional download and they are supposed to be better than the console version. So it's not the same settings.
And don't forget downsampling..
And the ultra textures for this game is an optional download and they are supposed to be better than the console version. So it's not the same settings.
did you go with a prebuilt without picking the parts yourself?I'm pissed. I have just bought new PC for 1100 us earlier this year and I cannot even play this game on high.
I'm pissed. I have just bought new PC for 1100 us earlier this year and I cannot even play this game on high.
you either picked parts terribly or youre wrongI'm pissed. I have just bought new PC for 1100 us earlier this year and I cannot even play this game on high.
Unless you bought a laptop or went for a super shitty deal you wouldn't have no trouble at all except for maybe a texture setting. I am going to assume you went for a 770. Or maybe a 760.
I'm pissed. I have just bought new PC for 1100 us earlier this year and I cannot even play this game on high.
I'm pissed. I have just bought new PC for 1100 us earlier this year and I cannot even play this game on high.
Yes, 770 with 2GB VRAM.
I did not expect any games that require more than that when I bought it.
The 770 itself wasn't in the most ideal position wise, and the amount of VRAM Nvidia put in their cards was terrible. It will still have no trouble with the game, except for the texture setting.
Before I bought it there was no this VRAM trend in PC gaming.
If I know this I wound buy other card instead.
[Fugo];132116849 said:hearing of 12Gb RAM system crash for memory usage makes mw wonder if my upcoming 16 Gb Ram rig will be enough or if I should spill the extra cash and go for 32 -_-
[Fugo];132116849 said:hearing of 12Gb RAM system crash for memory usage makes mw wonder if my upcoming 16 Gb Ram rig will be enough or if I should spill the extra cash and go for 32 -_-
Before I bought it there was no this VRAM trend in PC gaming.
If I know this I wound buy other card instead.
calls for reason are sadly pissing in the wind at this pointI'm taking this 6GB thing with a grain of salt. Recommended settings are generally largely inflated and this value seems like no exception.
Let's see how this runs before jumping to conclusions.
Before I bought it there was no this VRAM trend in PC gaming.
If I know this I wound buy other card instead.
It bot really a trend. There have been 2 or 3 games that have extra texture settings.
That 770 will run every new game with most settings turned up.
Is this number real? I know they have 2 cores for the os, and whatever, it's not like they are very powerful... but 3GB of RAM?
Why the fuck do they reserve that much?
If that's true there is no way in hell that a game running with the same settings as in Ps4 could possible need more than 4GB of vram on pc. Besides it been totally broken.
You are in luck!Yes, 770 with 2GB VRAM.
I did not expect any games that require more than that when I bought it.
Both this and the a Evil Within thread are ending up much ado about nothing.I'm taking this 6GB thing with a grain of salt. Recommended settings are generally largely inflated and this value seems like no exception.
Let's see how this runs before jumping to conclusions.
Man I thought 4gb would be enough for this gen @ 1080p.
This paranoia is getting out of hand.[Fugo];132116849 said:hearing of 12Gb RAM system crash for memory usage makes mw wonder if my upcoming 16 Gb Ram rig will be enough or if I should spill the extra cash and go for 32 -_-
Ahaha oh nvm, should have read first hahaIt probably will. It seems this is not about 1080p. This is about 4k down sampling. Which is simply running at 4k on a 1080p monitor.
Man I thought 4gb would be enough for this gen @ 1080p.
Hopefully it's just a recommendation...?
I remember people recommending 6GB VRAM for Watch Dogs to run at ultra, yet my 3GB 780 Ti ran it at max settings perfectly. A lot of "requirements" and "recommendations" are just inflated sometimes aren't they?
I don't think it's technically accurate to call, for example PS4's memory 'VRAM'. I might be wrong but I don't think GDDR5 necessarily means the same as VRAM, just that that's its typical purpose. I think it's a bit misleading because people seem to think 8 minus the 3 for the OS equals 5GB of VRAM when it's really just 5GB of RAM, some of which will be used as VRAM for storing graphics data and some will store non-graphics data.
Someone correct me. I'm always wrong about this stuff.
Hopefully it's just a recommendation...?
I remember people recommending 6GB VRAM for Watch Dogs to run at ultra, yet my 3GB 780 Ti ran it at max settings perfectly. A lot of "requirements" and "recommendations" are just inflated sometimes aren't they? "i7" is often thrown on the list of recommended specs in some games when our i5s are running games on ultra without a hiccup.
I'd be upset if this is true.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9Cu9Wb-6l0&feature=player_detailpage#t=12
(^ Ultra textures are enabled, meaning must have the pack)
Also: Video is compressed as fuck. So no way of judging actual detail.
[Fugo];132116849 said:hearing of 12Gb RAM system crash for memory usage makes mw wonder if my upcoming 16 Gb Ram rig will be enough or if I should spill the extra cash and go for 32 -_-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9Cu9Wb-6l0&feature=player_detailpage#t=12
(^ Ultra textures are enabled, meaning must have the pack)
Also: Video is compressed as fuck. So no way of judging actual detail.
No, it won't. We'll end up having 8GB as a minimum for this gen even for 1080p pretty soon. And all the improvements of PC versions will require even more. Essentially you need 8GB of RAM to fit 8GB of data in them. Having system RAM doesn't change much on PC because of how slow any access to it is from the GPU. We're likely to need 8+8 to be able to run this gen games without problems.It probably will. It seems this is not about 1080p. This is about 4k down sampling. Which is simply running at 4k on a 1080p monitor.
No, it won't. We'll end up having 8GB as a minimum for this gen even for 1080p pretty soon. And all the improvements of PC versions will require even more. Essentially you need 8GB of RAM to fit 8GB of data in them. Having system RAM doesn't change much on PC because of how slow any access to it is from the GPU. We're likely to need 8+8 to be able to run this gen games without problems.
No, it won't. We'll end up having 8GB as a minimum for this gen even for 1080p pretty soon. And all the improvements of PC versions will require even more. Essentially you need 8GB of RAM to fit 8GB of data in them. Having system RAM doesn't change much on PC because of how slow any access to it is from the GPU. We're likely to need 8+8 to be able to run this gen games without problems.
No, it won't. We'll end up having 8GB as a minimum for this gen even for 1080p pretty soon. And all the improvements of PC versions will require even more. Essentially you need 8GB of RAM to fit 8GB of data in them. Having system RAM doesn't change much on PC because of how slow any access to it is from the GPU. We're likely to need 8+8 to be able to run this gen games without problems.
Friend tried it with the texture pack on his 980. Said he gets about 75fps average in the benchmark (something like 185fps max).
No, it won't. We'll end up having 8GB as a minimum for this gen even for 1080p pretty soon. And all the improvements of PC versions will require even more. Essentially you need 8GB of RAM to fit 8GB of data in them. Having system RAM doesn't change much on PC because of how slow any access to it is from the GPU. We're likely to need 8+8 to be able to run this gen games without problems.
Haha based on what? Two games. Next you'll be telling us 12 core processors are going to be mandatory for 1080p.
Based on the past generation, where console games ran with 256mb of vram/512 unified but much more was needed on pc, I think we will reach the point eventually where 8gb of vram is required for resolutions like 1200p, msaax4, etc.
What the hell, based on what? Because the minimum for this is 1GB of VRAM. You want to be on par on console textures you'll need 3GB of VRAM. Which is how much the consoles also use, so that makes sense. And then you have 6GB of VRAM if you have got the specs for it and that is fine.
But it isn't "required" at all. We now need a boost of VRAM because the consoles have way more than they had before, but it is unlikely that the VRAM demands will suddenly be much higher again.
If you get problems with VRAM you won't notice it through average FPS, it will cause a stutter.