BigTnaples
Todd Howard's Secret GAF Account
Should this issue have The Order review? The famous 3 out of 10?
Wait did they really give the Order a 3/10?
Loss of any and all credibility if true.
Should this issue have The Order review? The famous 3 out of 10?
Wait did they really give the Order a 3/10?
Loss of any and all credibility if true.
Wait did they really give the Order a 3/10?
Loss of any and all credibility if true.
Wait did they really give the Order a 3/10?
Loss of any and all credibility if true.
Would be fun if it gets less than 9. Probably won't cause they'd get shat on if they did though.
No hype. For all we know the game could end up like The Order 1886.
It'll be a 9 or 10.
If they gave Dark Souls II, which was developped by a B-team, they can't go lower with that one.
Recent review not-embargoes might have ruined it, but usually games would get reviews a week before they're out. A couple of weeks doesn't seem that far-fetched especially for a print magazine compared to an online outlet. We'll see tomorrow though, whether it's a full-blown review.
Incoming GAF meltdown, no matter what the score.
Dock one more point if there's no Horse in the messages.- No Well, What Is It gesture
4/10
Edge now costs £5.50 an issue!? ... Am I reading that right!?
What does the team has to do with the score? If the game is good, it will get a good score. And Dark Souls II was good.
It'll be a 9 or 10.
If they gave Dark Souls II, which was developped by a B-team, they can't go lower with that one.
Lucky for us, this is only your opinion
£fivefifty
Presumably the review is 10/10 or it wouldn't really warrant this kind of cover. I can't think of many Edge covers which have been dedicated to reviews rather than previews/features.
Expecting a 6.5 for the notoriety.
Probably going to be dinging it for a bunch of things it isn't rather than what it is. Not open world, not RPG enough, not enough player choice, pace of combat is not fast enough, etc. etc.
I like all the underrating in this thread that's being given to the game. It will make that 9/10 all the more enjoyable ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°
Expecting a 6.5 for the notoriety.
Probably going to be dinging it for a bunch of things it isn't rather than what it is. Not open world, not RPG enough, not enough player choice, pace of combat is not fast enough, etc. etc.
Expecting a 6.5 for the notoriety.
Probably going to be dinging it for a bunch of things it isn't rather than what it is. Not open world, not RPG enough, not enough player choice, pace of combat is not fast enough, etc. etc.
Pretty much every PS retail exclusive has rated below or at average, with the one exception of Naughty Dog games. I don't see that changing. For whatever reason reviewer's the just don't match with Sony's tastes on the games they decide to fund.
Pretty much every PS retail exclusive has rated below or at average, with the one exception of Naughty Dog games. I don't see that changing. For whatever reason reviewer's tastes just don't match with Sony's tastes on the games they decide to fund.
Does every fucking thread have to become a the order thread these days?
Give it a rest.
What is this influx of people suddenly assigning low score to Bloodborne? Did Dark Souls and Demon's Souls ceasing to exist because of The Order 1886?
since you create your character, and it is anonymous...I had to give my character the name "Fight" just so I could recognize what she should do in battle.
What makes you think that?
I dunno probably because of Driveclub getting dinged for not being an open world racer when that's by no means the norm in racing games or what the game was designed to be at all.
Lol @ some of you predicting 6s and even lower scores. Clueless people will be clueless no matter what.
Edge gave DC an eight.
I dunno probably because of Driveclub getting dinged for not being an open world racer when that's by no means the norm in racing games or what the game was designed to be at all.
Well, it is a somewhat niche Japanese game, so you never know..........
This early and only Edge? I like the cover, anyhow.
That's a fantastic cover.
As for the review.
8.
A solid follow up to Demon's and Dark Soils, but fails to fully capitalise on being a new IP. Doesn't take enough risks, doesn't do enough to differentiate itself from past games, the new gun mechanic, while sounding like a revolution, actually turns out to be a failure in its execution.
Bloodbourne ultimately fails to capture what made Demon's and Dark such good games.
Why would it be fun?
Lol @ some of you predicting 6s and even lower scores. Clueless people will be clueless no matter what.