FairXchange
Member
Well I assume? Depending on the hardware of course.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
NXGamer first look at XboxOne version of Just Cause 3 (hint: it's baaaaaad)
- Thread starter AgentOtaku
- Start date
opticalmace
Member
The giant bomb quick look was on PC and it looked great (framerate included). I don't know what hardware they were using though.... I assume it wasn't a beast-mode PC, but IDK.
edit: looks like I was repeatedly beaten.
I want to know this too
KnightHart
Member
Well I guess I'm getting the PC version then
I still think it's a damn shame the game is performing like shit on consoles. I also think it's a damn shame that there are posts in this thread that are basically making fun of people for wanting to buy it on console because it's "the wrong version." So whats gonna take Hottest Technical Mess this year? Fallout 4 or JC3 on consoles?
I still think it's a damn shame the game is performing like shit on consoles. I also think it's a damn shame that there are posts in this thread that are basically making fun of people for wanting to buy it on console because it's "the wrong version." So whats gonna take Hottest Technical Mess this year? Fallout 4 or JC3 on consoles?
It is a 4790k and a 780ti and probably 16GB of ram.
You sure, even the Gbeast PC? It's a newer studio, I thought they built a new one with a 980.
Fairly sure, partially because I watched two streams of Vinny failing to build the machine. He also posted specs on the forum.
Digital preorder cancelled, sux yoI was surprised how easy it was to call Microsoft and cancel it though, whole call took a bit over 5 minutes including the menus I was floored how easy that was.
Really hate how Sony hasn't caught up yet.
I had a refund submitted for my PS4 digital pre-order, but all I can do now is wait with my fingers crossed. There's no reason why Sony should be able to deny a refund on a pre-order.
I've heard that it was mostly made by the new avalanche office in new york, not the core team who made jc2 and mad max.
I wonder if that has something to do with it..
User 479360
Banned
Oh, okay. I know what you're talking about now. I've experienced it before.
Mass Effect
Member
You might get slowdowns during heavy-action scenes, but you'll be fine otherwise. For reference, here are the system requirements:
Minimum Specifications
OS: Vista SP2, Win 7 SP1, Win 8.1 (64-bit Operating System Required)
CPU: Intel Core i5-2500K, 3.3 Ghz | AMD Phenom II X6 1075T 3 Ghz
Memory: 6GB RAM
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 (2GB) | AMD Radeon HD 7870 (2GB)
Recommended Specifications
OS: Vista SP2, Win 7 SP1, Win 8.1 (64-bit Operating System Required)
CPU: Intel Core i7-3770, 3.4 GHz | AMD FX-8350, 4.0 GHz
Memory: 8 GB Ram
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 (3GB) | AMD R9 290 (4GB)
Abilidebob
Member
PC Arkham Knight maybe?
Think of Firefox. After having a few tabs open over hours or days. From snappy to sluggish.
Easily Arkham Knight on PC. By a long country mile.
Dr. Kitty Muffins
Member
This is why we shouldnt be in a rush to judge games before release. If we get it seriously wrong, we kill or harm a developer who did all the right things.
They've actually replied to a few people complaining about performance and load times, in addition to the disconnection problems.
This generation is so not lasting 8 years.
First thing devs are going to say when they get asked by Microsoft and Sony what they struggled with this gen and what could be better next gen is, the damn CPU!
The answer will likely be in AMD's Zen. Regardless of what version of Zen will be available in a few years, as next gen consoles get developed, even the first Zen processors launching late next year should be leagues better than the shitty Jaguar CPUs in PS4 and Xbox One.
Reportedly, Zen will offer a 40% improvement clock for clock vs AMD's current desktop FX CPUs, and Jaguar is far below even those.
If next gen consoles replace the PS4/X1's 8x Jaguar cores that run at 1.6 - 1.75 GHz, with 8x Zen or Zen+ cores clocked at the ~3 GHz ballpark, give or take, it should mean a real leap forward for next gen consoles over current gen consoles, on the CPU side. Nevermind the more powerful GPUs, High Bandwidth Memory, etc. Of course, I have no clue as to what an 8 core Zen processor at ~3 GHz might look like in terms of heat and power usage, on 14/16nm or 10nm FinFET, that's why I won't guess beyond 8 cores and what may or may not be a reasonable clockspeed..
The bottom line is, devs are going to get just about everything they can get out of current consoles much faster than they did with Xbox 360 and PS3.
First thing devs are going to say when they get asked by Microsoft and Sony what they struggled with this gen and what could be better next gen is, the damn CPU!
The answer will likely be in AMD's Zen. Regardless of what version of Zen will be available in a few years, as next gen consoles get developed, even the first Zen processors launching late next year should be leagues better than the shitty Jaguar CPUs in PS4 and Xbox One.
Reportedly, Zen will offer a 40% improvement clock for clock vs AMD's current desktop FX CPUs, and Jaguar is far below even those.
If next gen consoles replace the PS4/X1's 8x Jaguar cores that run at 1.6 - 1.75 GHz, with 8x Zen or Zen+ cores clocked at the ~3 GHz ballpark, give or take, it should mean a real leap forward for next gen consoles over current gen consoles, on the CPU side. Nevermind the more powerful GPUs, High Bandwidth Memory, etc. Of course, I have no clue as to what an 8 core Zen processor at ~3 GHz might look like in terms of heat and power usage, on 14/16nm or 10nm FinFET, that's why I won't guess beyond 8 cores and what may or may not be a reasonable clockspeed..
The bottom line is, devs are going to get just about everything they can get out of current consoles much faster than they did with Xbox 360 and PS3.
TheSpoiler
Member
Thank god for the video analysis found within the OP!
MMaRsu
Banned
Gonna stream some Ps4 gameplay here:
http://199.66.238.56/channel/mmarsu-s-ps4-live-show
Im gonna try to cause some havoc and see how the fps holds up. You can also look at the lengthy loading times. Fun guaranteed!
http://199.66.238.56/channel/mmarsu-s-ps4-live-show
Im gonna try to cause some havoc and see how the fps holds up. You can also look at the lengthy loading times. Fun guaranteed!
Tony Hawk.
MMaRsu
Banned
I havent seen any responses about the ps4 fps or performance issues, only with the connection problem.
johnnydrama
Banned
Arkham Knight PC runs at over 30fps even on weaker GPUs, so not really. It's 60fps that's hard to maintain.
SlasherJPC
Banned
Streaming xbox one version here. Www.twitch.tv/slasherjpc
Pestilence11
Member
Nobody is denying that the CPUs in the consoles are weak and probably a significant bottleneck but I think this game has other issues (inefficient, poor code).
I wonder if Giant Bomb will split their reviews again.
Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 5 seems a more likely candidate. You can at least work around Arkham Knight's problems to some extent with tweaks, and it doesn't have the glitches that appear to be a problem with THPS5.
johnnydrama
Banned
I'm considering picking it up on Steam, but not before the reviews are out. The performance might not be the only thing wrong with it since the game is being rushed out.
Still looks like the game I am wanting to play. I am just not seeing anything that is going to stop me from having blast.
Enter the Dragon Punch
Banned
these are the sacrifices that had to be made to get mad max out the door in sept
Oh. You're right. I displaced the knowledge of that game from my mind.
Oh absolutely true, not saying otherwise. I think both things are real issues, in the short and long term.
Abilidebob
Member
Wasn't the performance in the 10s when you used the Batmobile, when it launched, even with good GPUs?
Ricerocket
Member
That's an issue with streaming data. Goes away with an SSD. It shouldn't have been released in that state.
Fantastical
Death Prophet
Lol, "we're looking into it". Makes it sound like this was brought to their attention after the fact and they had no idea about it when they launched the game.
johnnydrama
Banned
When I played it on my 970 it was usually between 40 and 80 at 1080p ultra. Just fluctuated a lot which really bothered me. That was on launch day though.
I eventually decided to play it on PS4 because I didn't want to bother with a messy port.
I am sorry but I find it hard to believe that they did not know about the performance issues until now.
This. I'm terrified of the PC version.
Pls, not this shit again for PC games. Haven't they gone through enough??
...shit.
GHG
Gold Member
Barkley's Justice
Member
lgtm tbh
opticalmace
Member
Did you watch the whole video? Sometimes it looks great.. other times the framerate is horrible.
PhazonBlazer
Member
Yeah, I'm glad I decided to wait for this:
PAULINK
I microwave steaks.
saving face. They already know, now is the question on whether or not it's possible to fix.
outunderthestars
Banned
I guess I am just not very picky because I watched that video and didn't have any problems with any of it.
KnownAsEpic
Banned
GameTrailers streamed the PS4 version http://www.twitch.tv/gametrailers/v/27880799