• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Byron Smith convicted of premeditated murder of two teens during home break-in

Status
Not open for further replies.

DR2K

Banned
You have the right to defend yourself in your own home even if that means having no choice but to kill the intruder. This was just a deranged person playing judge, jury, and executioner for sport.
 
I remember watching ID/Dateline/20/20(whatever the program was called)

I was actully like "why is this news" as I agreed with the first half hour as it seemed like a man defending his house....then the tapes were played.....


...cold-blooded killer...
 

platocplx

Member
You have the right to defend yourself in your own home even if that means having no choice but to kill the intruder. This was just a deranged person playing judge, jury, and executioner for sport.

yep I agree. That went so far beyond self defense. threats were elimnated with one shot, every extra shot says a lot. also its great he recorded pretty much screwed himself over. I hate thieves like the next person but this is far far far beyond what those kids deserved which is not being executed for burglary.
 

GaimeGuy

Volunteer Deputy Campaign Director, Obama for America '16
Indeed. But man what the heck is wrong with people ? Like how can a human being be so evil ? It just boggles my mind.
Part of it is tribalism. We are empathetic creatures, but we also have biological predispositions to throw empathy out the window when it comes to the "other"
 

LQX

Member
Wow at that audio. After hearing it I wonder if they investigated to see if he may have killed others. Hard to believe those two were the first people he has ever killed. He sounds deranged and as if he enjoyed it.
 

GorillaJu

Member
It's not really like that at all. No one has to break the law to go to a movie theater. These kids had to break the law in order to spring his trap.

You would think them breaking the law doesn't give him license to kill them. It's the police's job to deal with people who violate the law, not the general public's.
 

TheSeks

Blinded by the luminous glory that is David Bowie's physical manifestation.
You have the right to defend yourself in your own home even if that means having no choice but to kill the intruder. This was just a deranged person playing judge, jury, and executioner for sport.

Agreed. He already incapacitated them, he didn't need to completely kill them. At that point he completely crossed the line on defending himself and went straight to murder.
 

Sorcerer

Member
Couldn't he have set them up and just call the Police to come over with sirens off to make the arrest?

His plan could have had a peaceful ending.
 
N

NinjaFridge

Unconfirmed Member
Couldn't he have set them up and just call the Police to come over with sirens off to make the arrest?

His plan could have had a peaceful ending.
He didn't want a peaceful ending, he wanted blood.
 

Gattsu25

Banned
Good to hear that his appeal was denied.

I listened to the audio and literally had a gag reflex. I feel physically sick :(

Those are not figures of speech.
 

GhaleonEB

Member
That audio track is one of the most horrifying things I've ever heard. Not recommended.

I read a transcript of it, and it was so upsetting I still remember it at random times and get upset. It's definitely not the kind of thing I'd want to hear. The man is a monster.
 
You have the right to defend yourself in your own home even if that means having no choice but to kill the intruder. This was just a deranged person playing judge, jury, and executioner for sport.

See this is an odd way to say this, you have the right to defend yourself anywhere and this includes deadly force if necessary. What this actually implies is you have the right to defend your stuff with deadly force, which I disagree with. You can call the cops and you can hide or leave the house while they are on the way. If the intruders become a danger to you or people close to you the former applies again regardless of location.
 

riotous

Banned
Another disturbing aspect of this case are/were all the people who supported this guy. Saw a special on the case and he had quite a few friends who claimed he must have just been under extreme stress; complete denial of how bloodthirsty he was.

On the flip side there was a lot of cognitive dissonance from the friends and family of the deceased acting like they were angels but that is expected and only natural.
 
The question in my mind is how do you actually lure in thieves? Seems rather strange. You can't technically lure them just moving your vehicle. So if his truck is borrowed, getting repaired he could be killed?

I get he moved it but the point is they shouldn't be going in.

Obviously this isn't my point in relation to the shooting which is horrible


No way they should have been shot but come on, don't break into people's homes. You shouldn't be doing that obviously and you can easily get shot.. I admit it be scared as hell at intruders. We lived on a small drive, had a few trucks come to our drive way which is well off the road. Always made me feel super afraid and couldn't stop looking at them through the blinds. They walked around the house once. That feeling is not known til you're in it.

Even with that said, I don't think he was afraid but not sure

Too many crazy people to be breaking into homes though.
 

Striek

Member
Another disturbing aspect of this case are/were all the people who supported this guy. Saw a special on the case and he had quite a few friends who claimed he must have just been under extreme stress; complete denial of how bloodthirsty he was.

On the flip side there was a lot of cognitive dissonance from the friends and family of the deceased acting like they were angels but that is expected and only natural.
So you recognise cognitive dissonance works for the victims families, don't you think it applies to the guiltys? Perhaps you have a little bit yourself at this moment.


I remember this thread from ages ago, its just a sad story and this was the right call from the Jury. Though he was guilty he was the victim of several break-ins and who knows how that unhinges a man and messes with his head. They could easily be the sort of frightening events that trigger psychosis. Nobody can say that Smith was a bloodthirsty monster from the outset.
 

GorillaJu

Member
Another disturbing aspect of this case are/were all the people who supported this guy. Saw a special on the case and he had quite a few friends who claimed he must have just been under extreme stress; complete denial of how bloodthirsty he was.

On the flip side there was a lot of cognitive dissonance from the friends and family of the deceased acting like they were angels but that is expected and only natural.

Friends are gonna look for circumstances that justify their crimes, they probably don't want to think that they lacked the ability to discern that they were friends with a bloodthirsty murderer.

What worries me more are the people who supported or congratulated him for killing the thieves.
 
I don't think it's correct to say he lured them in at all.

He was prepared. That's a different thing. It's not like he picked them out, and then somehow tricked them into coming into his house. They did that themselves. Being repeatedly robbed is a massive psychological violation. After going through that, I am not that shocked by his actions. I think many people would like to kill their thieves.

He may be deranged and a sicko, but maybe the thieves made him that way. And is this man even deranged or is he a product of American gun culture and laws? The police is trained to empty their guns on a threat, not shocking that an ordinary citizen would think doing the same is fine on someone who breaks into your house.

I mean American culture pretty much says, if you break into someones house, you're fair game. If you attack a cop, you're fair game. If this guy wasn't talking to himself, and recording it, I don't think many would have a problem with the rest of the details, including awaiting thieves with guns in a dark basement.
 
I don't think it's correct to say he lured them in at all.

He was prepared. That's a different thing. It's not like he picked them out, and then somehow tricked them into coming into his house. They did that themselves. Being repeatedly robbed is a massive psychological violation. After going through that, I am not that shocked by his actions. I think many people would like to kill their thieves.

He may be deranged, but maybe the thieves made him deranged. And is this man even deranged or is he a product of American gun culture and laws? The police is trained to empty their guns on a threat, not shocking that an ordinary citizen would think doing the same is fine on someone who breaks into your house.

I mean American culture pretty much says, if you break into someones house, you're fair game. If you attack a cop, you're fair game. If this guy wasn't talking to himself, and recording it, I don't think many would have a problem with the rest of the details, including awaiting thieves with guns in a dark basement.
He moved his car so people would rob him while he was there with a gun and traps
 

GaimeGuy

Volunteer Deputy Campaign Director, Obama for America '16
I don't think it's correct to say he lured them in at all.

He was prepared. That's a different thing. It's not like he picked them out, and then somehow tricked them into coming into his house. They did that themselves. Being repeatedly robbed is a massive psychological violation. After going through that, I am not that shocked by his actions. I think many people would like to kill their thieves.

He may be deranged and a sicko, but maybe the thieves made him that way. And is this man even deranged or is he a product of American gun culture and laws? The police is trained to empty their guns on a threat, not shocking that an ordinary citizen would think doing the same is fine on someone who breaks into your house.

I mean American culture pretty much says, if you break into someones house, you're fair game. If you attack a cop, you're fair game. If this guy wasn't talking to himself, and recording it, I don't think many would have a problem with the rest of the details, including awaiting thieves with guns in a dark basement.

The entire intent of his actions (turning off the lights, moving his car) was to make it appear that no one was home. All in order to get the robbers to come into his booby trapped house, so he could kill them.

He did not specifically target an individual on the street, but he lured thieves into his home just so he could kill them under the guise of "self-defense"

It was completely premeditated murder designed to look like a home invasion gone wrong.
 
He moved his car so people would rob him while he was there with a gun and traps

He moved his car so he could be at home in case people robbed him.That's not proof he wanted to be robbed. Being prepared for a bad event that you know is going to happen, is not the same thing as actually creating this bad event . No one wants to be robbed.

Luring them would mean he actually selected his prey and tricked them into deciding to choose to rob his house. Perhaps, I am nitpicking, but I don't think so. I think there is distinction between the motives. Luring implies he was just bloodthirsty and wanted to kill, and this was his chance, rather than this being a case of a homeowner believing it is okay to kill thieves.
 
He moved his car so he could be at home in case people robbed him.That's not proof he wanted to be robbed. Being prepared for a bad event that you know is going to happen, is not the same thing as actually creating this bad event . No one wants to be robbed.

Luring them would mean he actually selected his prey and tricked them into deciding to choose to rob his house. Perhaps, I am nitpicking, but I don't think so. I think there is distinction between the motives. Luring implies he was just bloodthirsty and wanted to kill, and this was his chance, rather than this being a case of a homeowner believing it is okay to kill thieves.

He baited them though...
 

GaimeGuy

Volunteer Deputy Campaign Director, Obama for America '16
He moved his car so he could be at home in case people robbed him.That's not proof he wanted to be robbed. Being prepared for a bad event that you know is going to happen, is not the same thing as actually creating this bad event . No one wants to be robbed.

Luring them would mean he actually selected his prey and tricked them into deciding to choose to rob his house. Perhaps, I am nitpicking, but I don't think so. I think there is distinction between the motives. Luring implies he was just bloodthirsty and wanted to kill, and this was his chance, rather than this being a case of a homeowner believing it is okay to kill thieves.

Its the exact same thing.

A homeowner who believed it was okay to kill thieves, and was bloodthirsty enough to get some thieves on his property so he could do just that.

You are defending a man who baited two teenagers with drug problems onto his property, knocked them unconscious, and then executed them. On a tarp he had placed in advance to prevent their blood from staining his precious property.
 
I don't think it's correct to say he lured them in at all.

He was prepared. That's a different thing. It's not like he picked them out, and then somehow tricked them into coming into his house. They did that themselves. Being repeatedly robbed is a massive psychological violation. After going through that, I am not that shocked by his actions. I think many people would like to kill their thieves.

He may be deranged and a sicko, but maybe the thieves made him that way. And is this man even deranged or is he a product of American gun culture and laws? The police is trained to empty their guns on a threat, not shocking that an ordinary citizen would think doing the same is fine on someone who breaks into your house.

I mean American culture pretty much says, if you break into someones house, you're fair game. If you attack a cop, you're fair game. If this guy wasn't talking to himself, and recording it, I don't think many would have a problem with the rest of the details, including awaiting thieves with guns in a dark basement.

He hid his car because he wanted people to break in. He lay in wait to execute them.
 

riotous

Banned
So you recognise cognitive dissonance works for the victims families, don't you think it applies to the guiltys? Perhaps you have a little bit yourself at this moment.

One party committed burglary and the other committed murder and said some disturbing ass shit.

My point is the former is more understandable than the latter which disturbs me. My post was clearly discussing how both sides had cognitive dissonance; what is up with your response?

I'll continue to be disturbed by it while trying to figure out why my post garnered these responses lol.
 

Wolfe

Member
He moved his car so he could be at home in case people robbed him.That's not proof he wanted to be robbed. Being prepared for a bad event that you know is going to happen, is not the same thing as actually creating this bad event . No one wants to be robbed.

Luring them would mean he actually selected his prey and tricked them into deciding to choose to rob his house. Perhaps, I am nitpicking, but I don't think so. I think there is distinction between the motives. Luring implies he was just bloodthirsty and wanted to kill, and this was his chance, rather than this being a case of a homeowner believing it is okay to kill thieves.

He turned off the lights, moved his car and set up a booby trap. Did you listen to the tape? I mean everything he did was set up so that he could kill whoever decided to steal from him...

His train of thought appears to be more of "I will set up a situation where I am more likely to be robbed, and will set up a trap so I can shoot and kill whoever does try to rob me" and less of "if I get robbed again I will be so scared I might shoot the robbers."
 

riotous

Banned
Friends are gonna look for circumstances that justify their crimes,

I understand the psychology behind it; I'm still disturbed by it and can't relate.

I've unfriended people for moral indescretions far below bloodthirsty murder.

You guys are welcome to not be disturbed by it.
 

TyrantII

Member
Yeah, I'm glad this guy will rot in prison.

What the kids did was not right. What's described here is downright Evil.


Fuck that guy.
 
You have the right to defend yourself in your own home even if that means having no choice but to kill the intruder. This was just a deranged person playing judge, jury, and executioner for sport.

Agreed complete. But like I said, there's rules to this shit. Can't bait intruders, kill em, wait a day, move bodies..etc.

Hope this guy rots.
 

Kaiterra

Banned
He moved his car so he could be at home in case people robbed him.That's not proof he wanted to be robbed. Being prepared for a bad event that you know is going to happen, is not the same thing as actually creating this bad event . No one wants to be robbed.

Luring them would mean he actually selected his prey and tricked them into deciding to choose to rob his house. Perhaps, I am nitpicking, but I don't think so. I think there is distinction between the motives. Luring implies he was just bloodthirsty and wanted to kill, and this was his chance, rather than this being a case of a homeowner believing it is okay to kill thieves.

Everything he did is like the opposite of what you'd want to do to be prepared to stop a burglary. You don't unscrew the light bulbs, you turn your lights on. You don't move your car, you leave it in the driveway. Criminals will generally stay away from a home if it appears to be occupied because that's an awesome way to get shot or go to jail.
 

GaimeGuy

Volunteer Deputy Campaign Director, Obama for America '16
Everything he did is like the opposite of what you'd want to do to be prepared to stop a burglary. You don't unscrew the light bulbs, you turn your lights on. You don't move your car, you leave it in the driveway. Criminals will generally stay away from a home if it appears to be occupied because that's an awesome way to get shot or go to jail.

No shit. His goal wasn't to stop a burglary. It was to kill some bad guys.
 
He moved his car so he could be at home in case people robbed him.That's not proof he wanted to be robbed. Being prepared for a bad event that you know is going to happen, is not the same thing as actually creating this bad event . No one wants to be robbed.

Luring them would mean he actually selected his prey and tricked them into deciding to choose to rob his house. Perhaps, I am nitpicking, but I don't think so. I think there is distinction between the motives. Luring implies he was just bloodthirsty and wanted to kill, and this was his chance, rather than this being a case of a homeowner believing it is okay to kill thieves.

Am I remembering this wrong, or did the police suspect he had actually tipped them off about an empty house to rob? The police could never prove it so it wasn't brought up at trial. Maybe I'm thinking of another case though, it's just a fuzzy memory.

Seems very weird though that he would make all these preparations just in case somebody came that specific night.
 

Breads

Banned
A chill went through my spine at the thought of the exact same situation in Florida would have yielded the exact opposite results. I don't know the law exactly but I find that Floridians literally have a sense of dead-to-rights to trespassers on their property.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom