• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Reddit [verified] User shares NX info: x86 Architecture, Second screen support etc.

Status
Not open for further replies.
oh-boy.gif
 

CHC

Member
It's really time for Nintendo to just show something, these leak Olympics are getting nuts here.....
 

Cronee

Member
Yes, for laptops/netbooks. It's not the sort of thing you can pull on a DS/Vita-sized handheld.

uRRkFD0.jpg


Size and power comparison with Tegra.

This is all kinds of wrong. Intel managed to shove a cherry trail atom into a stick barely wider than an hdmi port while being only a few inches long. The atom soc is tiny and operates on only 2 watts. Also, look at the GPD Win, a 3DS sized windows gaming handheld based on the atom x5 z8550. It is entirely possible to have an x86 handheld because the tech already exist.
 

KingBroly

Banned
At this point, I've stopped trying to figure out what Nintendo will and won't do. There are times where they look like geniuses, while others they look like nimrods.
 

Genio88

Member
Fake or not it's not like this is a big rumor, i mean i give all those things for granted, you can't go out with a no X86 architecture console today, also second screen support is something that smartglass etc did like 6 year ago, also i'm sure NX will be at least as powerful as PS4/XB1, if the third parties are gonna support it though is yet to be seen.
The only thing which is still a mystery is the controller, and if it'll be able to become a handheld when needed
 

Parapraxis

Member
"Can handle ports of current-gen games" does not mean "backwards compatibility." "x86 architecture" pretty much says it WON'T be backwards compatible, unless Nintendo goes all Microsoft and writes a really good emulator.

I wouldn't bet on that happening...

Possible Nintendo hired and worked with the Dolphin emulator team?! Oh man I want to believe BC can happen.
 

Pokemaniac

Member
x86 doesn't necessarily mean power. As far as I know (as a layman) it's just different architecture/instruction set. A better comparison would be that PowerPC is Latin and x86 is English (I think)

It's a bit more complicated in practice. For example, the POWER ISA used by the Wii U tends to be found more in servers and the like due to how the chips have been developed.

But in general, yes, ISA does not directly indicate power level.
 

joedick

Member
Didn't Iwata say that the Wii U was built with the next system in mind? He was saying that it would help prevent a software drought at launch. Wouldn't that assume that BC/or at least VC carry-over should be possible?

I was under the impression that was why they bailed on 3DS VC, they focused on Wii U cause it would be easier to carry over.
 

StereoVsn

Member
This is all kinds of wrong. Intel managed to shove a cherry trail atom into a stick barely wider than an hdmi port while being only a few inches long. The atom soc is tiny and operates on only 2 watts. Also, look at the GPD Win, a 3DS sized windows gaming handheld based on the atom x5 z8550. It is entirely possible to have an x86 handheld because the tech already exist.
Yeah people seem fixated on Intel Atom from 2010 not from 2016.
 

blastprocessor

The Amiga Brotherhood
So following same APU architecture as PS4/Xbox. This is really good for Nintendo 3rd party adoption - make things much easier l guess.
 

Pokemaniac

Member
Fake or not it's not like this is a big rumor, i mean i give all those things for granted, you can't go out with a no X86 architecture console today, also second screen support is something that smartglass etc did like 6 year ago, also i'm sure NX will be at least as powerful as PS4/XB1, if the third parties are gonna support it though is yet to be seen.
The only thing which is still a mystery is the controller, and if it'll be able to become a handheld when needed

Yes you can. So long as it's powerful enough, no one will care.
 

yyr

Member
Possible Nintendo hired and worked with the Dolphin emulator team?! Oh man I want to believe BC can happen.

Unfortunately, Nintendo's history implies that they don't like anyone's emulation projects besides their own. "Emulator" is a dirty word to them =(

Even if the results are better than their very own VC I doubt they'd be interested =(
 

Lonely1

Unconfirmed Member
This is all kinds of wrong. Intel managed to shove a cherry trail atom into a stick barely wider than an hdmi port while being only a few inches long. The atom soc is tiny and operates on only 2 watts. Also, look at the GPD Win, a 3DS sized windows gaming handheld based on the atom x5 z8550. It is entirely possible to have an x86 handheld because the tech already exist.

  • Intel is a step (or two) ahead on everyone else when it comes to manufacturing processes advancements, specially compared to AMD.
  • Atom solutions are lower performance than comparable ARM socs.
  • Those Atom sticks get very hot even when Idle.
  • Nintendo won't use Intel.
  • AMD is several gens behind Intel when it comes to x86 performance.

I'm sure the handheld won't be x86.
 

Plum

Member
Can someone explain why x86 is a big deal? I'm not in the know with this hip lingo :<

Basically it makes porting games to the console a lot easier, which will make it more enticing to third parties. x86 is the architecture the PS4, Xbone and PC use.
 

AdanVC

Member
All this info claiming that 3rd party devs doesn't even have their kits yet sounds so dissapointing if they want to launch this thing during the holidays. If Nintendo thinks they can get away with carrying another holiday only with Wii U and 3DS then they're literally done. The amount of competition from others is simply too much to try to survive another holiday with their outdate devices. I can see 3DS having one last succesful holiday thanks to Pokémon Sun/Moon but Wii U not. Not even with the new Zelda. Wii U is done. The competition is bringing new stuff from all sides: VR, top notch massive exclusives and even new and improved hardware with those rumors about PS4K and Xbox 1.5. Nintendo doesn't have any of that (except Zelda but we still don't know shit about it) as far as we know and if they don't talk soon they will become as irrelevant as a tamagotchi. Wich I think they are already.
 

Piggus

Member
X86 should be pretty obvious considering virtually every game now is built around that architecture.

As for BC, they'd have to either build an awesome emulator or just include some sort of Wii U SOC.
 

10k

Banned

Rodin

Member
Basically it makes porting games to the console a lot easier, which will make it more enticing to third parties. x86 is the architecture the PS4, Xbone and PC use.
The architecture they're using is simply irrelevant as long as performances are comparable or better. Going with x86 when they want to develop a unified legacy architecture is simply asinine, there are no pros for them in using it compared to ARM.

I still believe this is fake.
 

CHC

Member
They can show something when they're ready. Little stuff like this won't matter at all when they unveil the system.

Of course, but it's just funny how out of hand this whole rumor cycle has become. The 3D printed fake was probably the defining moment of craziness haha
 
Just like the verified controller leaks from trusted sources.

Something to keep in mind is that just because the controllers were faked, doesn't mean the actual controller won't end up looking like that.

The verified leaks, along with Nintendo's patent could suggest that Nintendo has/had a legitimate controller that was similar enough in some way to be verified.

It's usually best to not believe rumors but assuming faked rumors can't turn out true is false.
 

phanphare

Banned
All I hear is:
"No I have the leaks."
"NO I HAVE THE LEAKS."
"YOU'RE A FAKER"
"YOU ARE THE FAKER"
"I'M HIGHER UP AT MY COMPANY I KNOW MORE THAN YOU DO."

"my uncle works for Nintendo."

"no MY uncle works for Nintendo."

"oh yeah? my uncle would beat the shit out of your uncle."
 

Griss

Member
Christ, if it's not a handheld I'm going to be so goddamned mad. What are they doing?

Then again, it's not like I believe this anyway so carry on.
 

NOLA_Gaffer

Banned
All these rumors...all these leaks. I think I'm just gonna wait for Nintendo to reveal the thing before I believe any of them.
 

Instro

Member
So the guy in the one thread saying he was playing a beta for a game that will be developed is lying? Even though Bish verified him?

Not that I disagree, but as I recall he simply heard during the beta that a port was happening, not that dev kits were out there. Maybe I'm misremembering.

Frankly though I'm pretty sure we've had an insider here say that dev kits were out there, so it seems a little hard to believe that they aren't...although you have to wonder what is out there when we heavy details and confirmations on the PS4k, meanwhile we basically have nothing on the NX.
 
Even if that is true.
I could make that up on a table napkin nothing special here.

This is all expected / rumored for a long time now.
Nothing that makes it anything special.
 
Every time a new NX rumor comes out, I trust it immediately. Then I come to Gaf and you guys bring my sanity back. Love you, guys.
 

Guess Who

Banned
So following same APU architecture as PS4/Xbox. This is really good for Nintendo 3rd party adoption - make things much easier l guess.

Basically it makes porting games to the console a lot easier, which will make it more enticing to third parties. x86 is the architecture the PS4, Xbone and PC use.

Unless devs are substantially writing their games in assembly, an x86 processor doesn't really make porting any easier. Most games are going to be written in a higher-level language (in which case the compiler does the vast majority of the work making the code run on different CPU architectures), or are built on a licensed engine that only needs to be ported to the new architecture once and then the devs don't really worry that much about it. Assembly is still used, sure, but usually only in small bits here and there for specific optimization, and rewriting those for a new CPU arch is the least of most dev's concerns. You still have to deal with Nintendo's different APIs, the different performance characteristics of the hardware, etc. regardless.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom