So power wise its an overclocked WiiU or:
27% of PS4 power.
38% Xbone power.
11% NEO power.
8% Scorpio power.
Pretty inadequate for 2017 machine tbh.
*if NX had X1 chip.
It's difficult to read at least the last page in a discussion?
http://www.mcvuk.com/news/read/nintendo-nx-the-pros-and-cons-of-a-transforming-portable/0170297
Yeah. People are leaving that out. A handheld will possibly be able to handle your current gen games. But lol Nintendo indeed.Yeah, if this rumour is true Nintendo are going to release what it not only by a massive margin their most technically ambitious handheld, but might actually be the most technically ambitious handheld ever released by any company. It's entirely possible that this could run genuinely decent ports of current generation games, on a handheld.
But, you know, "lol, Nintendo".
That easily discards the extra chip on the dock. I see that as sone kind of mid—gen upgrade rather than a rather useless expensive add—on.
Pretty much confirms that there will be no backwards compatibility. No surprise there.
Also,
"you can think of the NX as a turbo charged last gen console"
... So barely a leap over the Wii-U then? What's with Nintendo's obsession with releasing turbo chared last gen hardware?
Yeah, if this rumour is true Nintendo are going to release what it not only by a massive margin their most technically ambitious handheld, but might actually be the most technically ambitious handheld ever released by any company. It's entirely possible that this could run genuinely decent ports of current generation games, on a handheld.
But, you know, "lol, Nintendo".
Why use the Shield TV as an indicator of price? Surely it'd make more sense to look at the Shield Tablet. While it ships with the older Tegra K1 it, like the NX, is a portable device with a screen and a form factor which better suits an SoC like the X1 (the Pixel C has a 9" screen). It also has a 1920 x 1200 resolution display.
Nintendo's chassis design would probably be more complex than a tablet (the Eurogamer drawing based on sources showed a kickstand), but the Shield Tablet has that NVidia SoC and a high resolution display, it's missing attachable controller pairs though.
Also remember the SemiAccurate report about Tegra being in the NX handheld. They claimed that Nintendo got a great price for the Tegra X1 chip and support, and there was a great post on GAF detailing how this is likely to be correct. Devices with X1 have sold poorly to date, and Nvidia would need to fulfil their wafer commitment to TSMC or pay a hefty fine. It'd be more beneficial to produce X1s for Nintendo instead.
If anything pushes the price up it'll be the strengthening Yen above all else. Hope that doesn't lead Nintendo to cheapen out on the overall design like I suspect they did with some of the hardware early this gen.
If it's going to claim to be a hybrid it will be compared to home consoles. If this is their solution for console gamers expect console expectations.
If it's going to claim to be a hybrid it will be compared to home consoles. If this is their solution for console gamers expect console expectations.
250 is a nonstarter for a handheld. Id say even 200 is too much
"Turbo powered last gen console."
So basically another Nintendo system that'll mostly only be worth it for the first party games.
Damn, but maybe they got a deal with NVIDIA? ha, desperate hoping
Is there a possibility that the base could increase power? Kind of like the Surface Book?
For my feeble mind, for comparison, what percentage of power would a gameboy be to a SNES?? ThanksSo power wise its an overclocked WiiU or:
27% of PS4 power.
38% Xbone power.
11% NEO power.
8% Scorpio power.
Pretty inadequate for 2017 machine tbh.
*if NX had X1 chip.
We still have osirisblack saying that the console would have no problem handling ports from current gen hardware, and lcgeek saying that the CPU is noticeably more powerful than what PS4/X1 have (although still slow compared to stuff like a FX8350). Considering they're both verified by mods and with a good track record, i think we're missing something here.I very much doubt that NX will use the Tegra X1 SoC since that will be two years old by the moment of NX launch. It'll probably be Tegra Parker which will be using Pascal GPU and Denver2 CPU (or ARM's core, both are possible).
If previous Tegra updates is an indication here that would mean that Parker should be ~2 times faster than TX1 which would bring it to ~50% of PS4 performance flops wise and probably ~2/3rds of PS4 performance in practice considering that NV h/w is usually much better at handling graphics per flop.
That's a lot for a handheld but it may not be enough for it to be a valid target for multiplatform releases even though in this case it should come pretty close to XBO h/w capabilities. The biggest issue can be the CPU however as even a quad core ARM may not be fast enough to run x86 octa core code for AMD's Jaguar.
I think it's possible that they'll reach XBO performance level and thus may become a valid platform for multiplatform releases. But they'll have to pull some s/w+h/w magic to do this, using an active cooled high performance mode for stationary operation for example and going to a lower performance passive one for handheld mode, with lower resolution.
Where is that claim coming from? Because as of now I only see a report in Eurogamer, not an official marketing from Nintendo.
Oh so this thread and all speculation there in shouldn't exist then. You can't pick and choose which parts of the rumor work best for you. Hybrid is in every other post in the larger thread are we pretending that isn't the perception of the NX?
3DS prooved 250 is a non-starter indeed. I think it would have worked great starting at 200.250 is a nonstarter for a handheld. Id say even 200 is too much
I think the gamble is will people actually use the console as a hybrid, as Nintendo has intended?
I could see a lot of kids, families, etc. not taking the time to dock the system.
We still have osirisblack saying that the console would have no problem handling ports from current gen hardware, and lcgeek saying that the CPU is noticeably more powerful than what PS4/X1 have (although still slow compared to stuff like a FX8350). Considering they're both verified by mods and with a good track record, i think we're missing something here.
We still have osirisblack saying that the console would have no problem handling ports from current gen hardware, and lcgeek saying that the CPU is noticeably more powerful than what PS4/X1 have (although still slow compared to stuff like a FX8350). Considering they're both verified by mods and with a good track record, i think we're missing something here.
Maybe Leadbetter's guess about Tegra X2 being the reason behind the delay to 2017 and the X1 running with noisy active cooling because it's a (overclocked) placeholder was spot on. I can't think of anything else at the moment.
I very much doubt that NX will use the Tegra X1 SoC since that will be two years old by the moment of NX launch.
Not sure how feasible this is, but it would be pretty awesome to have Bluetooth w/NFC for pairing, and have the controllers attach magnetically sort of like the iPad Smart Cover. Then there would be no electrical connectors or latching mechanisms to break.I'm honestly concerned, sensibly or not, about wear and tear from detaching and combining controllers all the time. Unless the screen is tiny or the handheld is too heavy I don't know why I'd spend more money to play it off TV.
$300 is not a mass market price for a Nintendo product, IMO. 3DS sold poorly at $250, as did Wii U at $300-350. If NX doesn't have an amazing hook, $300 is too high.If it's going to claim to be a hybrid it will be compared to home consoles. If this is their solution for console gamers expect console expectations.
And as far as price the ps4 was also cheaper than people expected but it was still $399. NX will probably be $299 dock included. That's mass market price.
Wii U had a decent third party lineup its first year, and nobody bought those games. Nintendo funded some great third party exclusives (Bayonetta 2 and W101) and nobody bought them. Anybody who cares about the big third party franchises already owns a PS4 or a X1 and is invested in those ecosystems.
Nintendo basically had 2 choices:
1. Try for parity with PS4 and X1 so they can get 3rd party multiplats, which will probably sell horribly.
2. Once again remain far behind in HW power, but unify their handheld w/console.
The second choice IMO makes FAR more sense than the first. Their handheld systems have always had stellar lineups. Being able to bring handheld games to console, and completely unify their development for one platform, will bring massively higher gains than getting multiplats.
Face it, it's only a tiny vocal minority saying "gee, I wish I had a third console that can play Call of Duty!"
From what we know so far? It's straight up a portable console with a dock that has HDMI out to play on a TV.
It's possible that the dock contains more hardware, but the development units definitely do not, and the only thing that hints that there COULD be more hardware in it, is a design patent for SCD (Supplementary Computational Devices).
I think it will be an X2 Chip. Or at least X1 for the Handheld and X2 for the base Station.
r700 GPU was 4 years old when it released on WiiU.
---------
This is Nintendo we are talking about, not only they don't care about if their stuff is underpowered but also if it is old tech (which is much much worse).
Yeah, pretty much.Well, as I've said it's perfectly possible that NX with Tegra Parker will reach at least XBO power levels flops wise. If that won't be just Parker but a customized SoC version with more ARM cores (8 cores of A57 for example; although 4 Denver2 are also possible) then its CPU capability may well be enough to handle CPU code from XBO/PS4 and even Neo. Then we don't know much yet about how they'll differentiate between stationary / TV output and handheld / mobile modes of operation.
Where? He made a good point about Nintendo not being willing to pay for Parker in a sub 300$ device, but we don't know what deal Nvidia offered them or how much it will cost considering it wasn't even shown to the public yet. Also this postlcgeek has made it pretty clear Parker is not happening. At best we will see a Nintendo tweaked X1.
tells me he doesn't know what SoC they're using or they're going to use in the final product. He made a good guess, but that's it. I still don't understand how a custom X1 would have a "noticeably better CPU" than an 8 core Jaguar though.I do remember this hell just a few posts ago I blurted out I want nintendo show off whatever this SOC chip is. Just things are happening it seems and I'm quite joyus, sadly overwatch is calling me.
I'm not owning up to what is considering we don't have final units. Just pumped team green is lending some assistance and nintendo feels it could be worthwhile. We don't know where the bullseye is but having a place to hit is a lot better than what may was.
They could just ask tencent for the Minster hunter online Assets.Nah, Capcom's secret is that they just phone in monster hunter games intentionally so they dont have to spend money on investment in higher end rendering to make more profits.
I expect it to still look like the Wii U Monster Hunter 3 port, but full 1080p hopefully and locked 30
Yeah, pretty much.
Where? He made a good point about Nintendo not being willing to pay for Parker in a sub 300$ device, but we don't know what deal Nvidia offered them or how much it will cost considering it wasn't even shown to the public yet. Also this post
tells me he doesn't know what SoC they're using or they're going to use in the final product. He made a good guess, but that's it. I still don't understand how a custom X1 would have a "noticeably better CPU" than an 8 core Jaguar though.
Anyway, Parker or X1, the real question is if the dock will have a cooling system that allows the console to use the chips at full speed. Maybe something like this inside of it
but obviously more sofisticated and "elegant". Otherwise it's pointless.
Didn't know this, good looking.WiiU doesn't use R700 GPU (nor is there such a GPU exist), it's using a GPU built on AMD's VLIW5 architecture which certainly was old by the time WiiU launched but it should be noted that AMD's newer GCN architecture wasn't ready to be used in WiiU within its launch frame so it's not like Nintendo had a lot of options with WiiU's h/w (going with NV's Fermi would make even less sense overall).
Sticking to TX1 on the other hand makes little sense as Parker is essentially the same as TX1 but better - built on a better process (16FF vs 20 planar which means more performance and/or better power consumption), using upgraded Pascal GPU (almost the same as TX1's Maxwell but better in general) and upgraded Denver2 CPU (if it's using that and not ARM's A57). So I don't see any reason why NX would stick with TX1 specifically instead of going with Parker.
Like I said before This is unprecedented power in a mobile SOC in comparison to its peers. This will outclass everything mobile when it releases.
For people who are saying that Nintendo is backing out of home consoles for good, maybe they're not wrong, but I keep thinking about Iwata's comment that there could be multiple form factors in a family that are "like brothers" and compared to the concept to Apple and iOS.
Maybe this is just the first in a line of new products all within the NX family.
Memory subsystem peculiarities non-withstanding, and assuming an off-the-shelf TX1 with 4x A57s@2GHz, TX1 would beat it handily in anything multi-threaded, about on-par in single-threaded.
We still have osirisblack saying that the console would have no problem handling ports from current gen hardware, and lcgeek saying that the CPU is noticeably more powerful than what PS4/X1 have (although still slow compared to stuff like a FX8350). Considering they're both verified by mods and with a good track record, i think we're missing something here.
Maybe Leadbetter's guess about Tegra X2 being the reason behind the delay to 2017 and the X1 running with noisy active cooling because it's a (overclocked) placeholder was spot on. I can't think of anything else at the moment.
For people who are saying that Nintendo is backing out of home consoles for good, maybe they're not wrong, but I keep thinking about Iwata's comment that there could be multiple form factors in a family that are "like brothers" and compared to the concept to Apple and iOS.
Maybe this is just the first in a line of new products all within the NX family.