Parker Steps · Chicago, Illinois
Yes yes, easy victory you can tell by the enthusiasm of her rallies....oh wait
Elaborate please. I saw that she lost some momentum on 538's map.
What do you mean, "joke post"?
Downward trend is clearly visible.
Also, 2 weeks ago, 538 had her chances at 90%. She is now down to 75%.
I'll believe it when I see it. I don't doubt it, but things can change, certainly.
The Clinton campaign needs to continue to act as if Trump is winning in a landslide. They can't get lazy. They have the momentum for sure, but they can't just ride on it. Hillary might still win in the end if they do that, but if they are active then her chance of success will be far, far greater.
Also, this ad showed up for this thread, lmao
You do realize that the image you JUST posted disagrees with you right?
A wall street shill, a libertarian, a racist rotting orange, and the quintessential antivaxxer!You heard it here, folks. You're free to vote your conscience in November.
You heard it here, folks. You're free to vote your conscience in November.
You do realize that the image you JUST posted disagrees with you right?
Honestly, liberals deserve to lose over their shitty premature victory laps. Both Stein and Johnson are pulling more from Clinton than they are from Trump.
What victory laps? August was a huge fundraising month and Clinton's ground game has been busting their butts for awhile. Trump barely had anything setup a month ago.
What victory laps? August was a huge fundraising month and Clinton's ground game has been busting their butts for awhile. Trump barely had anything setup a month ago.
Honestly, liberals deserve to lose over their shitty premature victory laps.
Both Stein and Johnson are pulling more from Clinton than they are from Trump.
It's easy to lie with fundraising & staffing numbers. How much does it matter what he raises, vs what the RNC raises, vs what third-party advocacy groups raise (the NRA), vs untracked money from Super PACS? Trump might not have a ground game, but the RNC does, and I don't think it makes much of a difference who is running the GOTV systems.
Clinton will probably win, but it's a single-digit race with two third-parties drawing from her base, and the Republicans remain the party of billionaires.
Which of them had any pull to begin with?It's also going to be interesting to see if all of the republicans endorsing Clinton now will have pull after she wins
It's easy to lie with fundraising & staffing numbers. How much does it matter what he raises, vs what the RNC raises, vs what third-party advocacy groups raise (the NRA), vs untracked money from Super PACS? Trump might not have a ground game, but the RNC does, and I don't think it makes much of a difference who is running the GOTV systems.
Clinton will probably win, but it's a single-digit race with two third-parties drawing from her base, and the Republicans remain the party of billionaires.
It's also going to be interesting to see if all of the republicans endorsing Clinton now will have pull after she wins
Ummmm...ok...you didn't answer my question. How is looking at polling data a victory lap? The Clinton campaign buying ads early and even moving into states that they traditionally wouldn't have fought in is literally the exact opposite of a victory lap.
I need this. I need this so bad. These debates are going to be hilarious
Democratic Party was in shambles at the time.
Which of them had any pull to begin with?
I expect some soul stealing moments. It's also going to be painstakingly clear for the millionth time how out of his depth he really is. He could barely string intelligible sentences together in the republican debates and he had like 50 like minded assholes to bounce off with. He's going to crater against Clinton.
Why would these nobody's, abject failures (Paulson) and 90 year olds have pull after the election where they endorsed the other party's candidate?Not saying that they do now? I'm talking about after the election
I wouldn't be so sure. In 2008 we were all salivating for the Biden-Palin debate but she benefited from rock-bottom expectations and there were just as many people saying that she won because she didn't completely embarrass herself.
GAF is filled with people that believe a landslide is imminent, like this entire thread. It is wildly disproportionate to the 70-85% chance of winning that she realistically has right now. People shouldn't read this much into campaign strategy.
Sorry, I'm just scared after the apparent surge in 3rd party support over the last few weeks which has mostly been at Hillary's expense. If people get complacent or buy into the revolving door of Clinton scandals, enough people could jump ship to make this close. Too many of my friends are still in the smoldering wreck of the Bernie-or-bust group.
You do realize that the image you JUST posted disagrees with you right?
finally, i thought i was the only oneN rigging Huh
That's not going to happen, you know that right? I don't know who feared you into thinking that but you should probably stop talking to them.How about we tell her to prepare for the 10% of the country that's going to pick up a gun on election day because they are stupid enough to thin the election was rigged, or more likely don't care because they would rather kill someone them accept they don't line in the 1800's
N rigging Huh
Listen they clearly meant NEW RIGGING, come on you really think someone would do that? Allude to awful racial slurs online???
You really think that n rigging is an obscure allusion to a racial slur and not a typo? Seems like a bit of a stretch to me.
There is also election night tears, that was an amusing thing in 2012.
Her favorables rating is about the same as a runaway freight train, too!
Clinton officials are also worried about projecting too much confidence when 64 percent of voters think the country is moving in the wrong direction and the candidate is intensely disliked; projecting a commanding position could negatively affect Democratic turnout needed to guarantee a win.
What in the world have you been smoking in this thread?? Just make a damn point instead of being cagey and asking questions. It reads like you think you're too intelligent to bother with engaging another poster lol
That's not going to happen, you know that right? I don't know who feared you into thinking that but you should probably stop talking to them.
I teach government and elections for a living. I am not going to pretend that someone has a legitimate point when they cherry pick data that fits the narrative they have created in their heads.