• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Sony demos 4K/HDR enhancements for PS4 Pro at TGS (FFXV, RE7, UC4, Horizon, Infamous)

fvng

Member
Yes.

neo_leak_135stw.jpg

That doesn't mean anything, It means games need to be compatible with both consoles but it doesn't mean all games are required to take full advantage of Pro beefed up specs.
 

Theonik

Member
That doesn't mean anything, It means games need to be compatible with both consoles but it doesn't mean all games are required to take full advantage of Pro beefed up specs.
There is no way to mandate pro feature sets as such. Developers have to have a pro mode but they can do no upgrades for it just leaving you with much smoother framerate.
 

fvng

Member
There is no way to mandate pro feature sets as such. Developers have to have a pro mode but they can do no upgrades for it just leaving you with much smoother framerate.

I wish this made some type of sense, can you please reword this for clarity
 

Inuhanyou

Believes Dragon Quest is a franchise managed by Sony
I wish this made some type of sense, can you please reword this for clarity

Its common sense. Just updating games by default to recognizing the Pro's hardware will boost performance for games, even if devs left games the same general settings as the original PS4 game. The CPU upclock and new GPU aren't just going to sit there and not do anything.
 

fvng

Member
Its common sense. Just updating games by default to recognizing the Pro's hardware will boost performance for games, even if devs left games the same general settings as the original PS4 game. The CPU upclock and new GPU aren't just going to sit there and not do anything.

1) is that confirmed? That nothing is necessary on the developer's end to benefit from the improved hardware?

2) yeah his post was definitely worded like shit, it's not me.
 

Tyaren

Member
It looks soooooo good. Dat grass!

Grass still appears to be non-existent after a radius of about 20m though.

Exactly. I don't see where people see any improvement in vegetation and LOD or shadow draw-in. It looks the exact same as the base version.
No wonder, if this is running in 4K mode, which doesn't add much if any graphical improvements. It's all about rendering the game in a much higher resolution. Additionally to that there's not that much additional power left on the PS4 Pro unless there's also a 1080p mode with graphical bells and whistles.
 

Kaze2212

Member
Exactly. I don't see where people see any improvement in vegetation and LOD or shadow draw-in. It looks the exact same as the base version.
No wonder, if this is running in 4K mode, which doesn't add much if any graphical improvements. It's all about rendering the game in a much higher resolution. Additionally to that there's not that much additional power left on the PS4 Pro unless there's also a 1080p mode with graphical bells and whistles.

The quality might not be the best, but if we assume that all the footage in the most recent trailer is resembling the base version of the game it already had some really nice improvements in regards to the foliage:

 

Inuhanyou

Believes Dragon Quest is a franchise managed by Sony
The quality might not be the best, but if we assume that all the footage in the most recent trailer is resembling the base version of the game it already had some really nice improvements in regards to the foliage:

Still has an issue with not seeing literally any foliage in the distance though.
 

Inuhanyou

Believes Dragon Quest is a franchise managed by Sony
1) is that confirmed? That nothing is necessary on the developer's end to benefit from the improved hardware?

2) yeah his post was definitely worded like shit, it's not me.

It is necessary for the developers to update their games with a pro mode, but the pro mode doesn't have to mean drastically using the power of the console in some huge way like upping the resolution significantly or making better graphical assets. It can be as simple as updating the software to recognize the hardware of the console, and let it run faster on its own.

Of course, that only goes for native 1080p titles. All games must be at a minimum of 1080p on Pro, so games that are 900p, or variable res between 900p and 1080p, like Final Fantasy 15 for example on PS4, must be set to a locked 1080p.
 

Theonik

Member
1) is that confirmed? That nothing is necessary on the developer's end to benefit from the improved hardware?

2) yeah his post was definitely worded like shit, it's not me.
1) As of right now, games need to be pro aware after the mandated period. This isn't a rule, but since the pro is faster in every way it should be the case for games which don't offer pro features, 4K or 1080p. The Xbone S similarly offers performance benefits for games due to the upclock though ms doesn't advertise the feature.
E: Yes, the exception is sub 1080p games like bf1 that also need to support 1080p.

2) I'm sorry I'm typing on mobile.
 

Kaze2212

Member
Still has an issue with not seeing literally any foliage in the distance though.

You can only expect so much from a PS4... and with that in mind it is actually quite decent in my opinion. But yeah, longer draw distance is always appreciated in any game!
 

Elios83

Member
Exactly. I don't see where people see any improvement in vegetation and LOD or shadow draw-in. It looks the exact same as the base version.
No wonder, if this is running in 4K mode, which doesn't add much if any graphical improvements. It's all about rendering the game in a much higher resolution. Additionally to that there's not that much additional power left on the PS4 Pro unless there's also a 1080p mode with graphical bells and whistles.

Until they release a proper direct comparison footage it will be hard to get a final judgement of the differences. And unfortunately I don't think we're going to get that before launch because they clearly don't want people to think that the PS/XB1 versions are not good enough.
But even looking at this shitty screen grab:

FFXVPro.png


I've never seen anything with this vegetation density in the normal PS4 version of the game. Coincidence?
Not to mention the texture quality that seems greatly improved (or it's the higher res that make the assets shine instead of blurring them).
Of course it's not like the Pro version will look like an other game, but the improvements are there and are noticeable.
 

benzy

Member
You can easily see the improved shadow LOD in XV pro footage compared to any of their base console footage.

From someone who saw that XV Pro footage reel in person and also played the TGS demo...

https://forum.finalfantasyxv.com/discussion/2647/tgs-demo-build-and-ffxv-pro-footage-impressions

Shuya: "FFXV Pro footage...

The footage being showed representing PS4 Pro was not actually running on a PS4P. It was a video, but having said that... it was night and day compared to the demo. You could see high quality details as far as you could see."
 

Tyaren

Member
Until they release a proper direct comparison footage it will be hard to get a final judgement of the differences. And unfortunately I don't think we're going to get that before launch because they clearly don't want people to think that the PS/XB1 versions are not good enough.
But even looking at this shitty screen grab:

FFXVPro.png


I've never seen anything with this vegetation density in the normal PS4 version of the game. Coincidence?
Not to mention the texture quality that seems greatly improved (or it's the higher res that make the assets shine instead of blurring them).
Of course it's not like the Pro version will look like an other game, but the improvements are there and are noticeable.

Yeah, that looks pretty from what we can actually even make out there. But I doubt the PS4 Pro will have more trees (in the back here) and bushes (in the front here). That's usually not even happening in PC versions of console games. What I would guess it will get are updates such as more grass and more objects displayed in the far distance but not more objects in the immediate or medium distance, like you seem to think is happening in this picture(?). I am also sure that textures will pop more, just because of the higher resolution but how are people able to judge that based on these images? ;)
Last but not least this region (with the birches) was never shown before in none PS4 Pro footage so that region might be usually lusher in vegetation, also on the regular PS4. The Leide desert and Duscae valley are more dry/arid in climate and thus it's obvious there are less bushes, trees and grass. What I meant by the LOD of vegetation looks the same was also based on the footage from Duscae in the Pro video.
 

Frostman

Member
This footage makes me want to invest in HDR, but I'm not willing to buy a TV for it when I prefer monitors for gaming.

Someone's going to release HDR ready monitors soon right? Please!
 

Karak

Member
Karak ive just watched both your primer vids on 4K and HDR. Great stuff man, so clear and concise, thank you for this! Look forward to your tv breakdowns and analysis. My money for a new HDR tv is on hold for now, your right the tech is still emergent and input lag needs to drop.

Sure no problem. I currently have just that tv right in front of me for some video coming soon of the reasons why its a good tv but not a good GAME HDR TV which no one is really covering. But I actually have HDR games right now so I can:)

I also watched both, and was thinking of getting a Samsung KS8000, but those convinced me to hold off.
Hopefully next year we'll get some better TVs.
Best idea so far ya.
 

doemaaan

Member
I've seen so many threads discussing which 4K/HDR sets to get although granted this thread is not that.

My advice is this, do your research and homework to make sure you can get the best possible bang for your buck. You have to take into account how much you're willing to spend and what you're criterias are.

For example (and I've posted this before) my criteria are the following:

65inches or bigger
Preferably a Samsung or Sony
Good input lag while in game mode and be able to do HDR simultaneously (an input lag of 30ms or below is acceptable to me)
No more than 2K I'm willing to spend

I've seen way too many posts of people just asking questions and expecting gaffers to just answer.

Folks must do their homework. I've read so many articles from CNET (shoutout to Geoffrey Morrison's articles) and frequented AV and AVS forums to get answers. I have read up on edge lit tvs, full array local dimming (which is top of the like when it comes to LCDs for HDR) terms like banding, light bleed and blooming, stuff that a year ago I knew nothing about. Again folks do your research.

First I wanted a 4K set, then I read that not all 4K sets support HDR, then I read that not all 4K sets support games at 60hz and whichever tv I purchased should be hdcp 2.2 compliant and should have hdmi 2.0a input (because that standard does support games at 60hz) etc

Then I read (around the time the Xbox One S was announced) that input lag on certain models would be higher because certain models do not do HDR mode while in the TV's game mode. Just recently Samsung released a firmware update (confirmed by UK's HDTV test site via Twitter)

https://twitter.com/HDTVTest/status/773859278050516992

For folks who don't have a clue and don't do their research they are literally stepping into a mine field when shopping for an HDTV.

I also advise folks to wait until next year which is what I plan on doing. CES is just around the corner.
It's posts like this that knock some sense into me.
 

longdi

Banned
Panasonic DX900/902 is pretty boss. It has 512 FALD zones vs 660 FALD of Sony new Z9D.

I prefer Japan brands because the sets in my homes lasted until i upgraded. Been hearing how Samsung/LG electronics break down after the 2-3 years mark.
 

Ravage

Member
You really need to see HDR in person to appreciate the upgrade on visual quality.

TGS has a section dedicated to PS4 Pro footage and i just keep going back to stare at it lol. FFXV and inFamous in particular, really impressed me.
 
Anyone know a way I can test HDR on my TV with the PS4? I Wana see it in action but from what I know no released game right now supports it.
 

Angel_DvA

Member
You really need to see HDR in person to appreciate the upgrade on visual quality.

TGS has a section dedicated to PS4 Pro footage and i just keep going back to stare at it lol. FFXV and inFamous in particular, really impressed me.

What is mind blowing actually is why Sony still haven't released proper 4H HDR direct feed video to download on their website ? Some of us have the technology but can't use it yet because reasons, it's like Microsoft or EA who released demos without HDR even when the final games will have it, it's too fucking stupid.

HDR is already difficult to market but if you don't released videos properly to people that can show it to other people, what is the point ?
 
How are you guys deciding that HDR looks better with these off screen grabs?

Are you on an HDR display or can you actually see the changes with a non HDR display?

Just a small correction watching jpg on HDR screen won't do anything. You need container that has data which HDR tv can interpret as such.
 

Caayn

Member
Panasonic DX900/902 is pretty boss. It has 512 FALD zones vs 660 FALD of Sony new Z9D.

I prefer Japan brands because the sets in my homes lasted until i upgraded. Been hearing how Samsung/LG electronics break down after the 2-3 years mark.
If you search for problems with a popular brand you'll always find people who have them. It's anecdotal but I've never had a TV break down on me and I've had quite a few different brands myself (Cat, LG, Panasonic, Philips)
 

Alexious

Member
I also watched both, and was thinking of getting a Samsung KS8000, but those convinced me to hold off.
Hopefully next year we'll get some better TVs.

The Samsung KS8000 has extremely low input lag, just 21-22ms at 4K HDR. There's no need to wait, it's an excellent TV (unless you need to watch it at an angle, which I personally don't) that comes for an affordable price.
 

spwolf

Member
The Samsung KS8000 has extremely low input lag, just 21-22ms at 4K HDR. There's no need to wait, it's an excellent TV (unless you need to watch it at an angle, which I personally don't) that comes for an affordable price.

isnt that 38-39ms actually?
 

Gitaroo

Member
I am surprised that many people recommend ks8000, from my impression the response time of the tv is way too slow for games I can literally see the inking ghosting effect on all the black color or dark scene. Far worse than what review described. People use to complain slow response time for pc mon but now its not an issue? Weird.
 
Not sure about the curret Tv market......are there 1080p hdr tvs available?
HDR looks like it really is worth it, but i dont need 4k resolutions. Im still fine with full hd resolution.
 

Chamber

love on your sleeve
Not sure about the curret Tv market......are there 1080p hdr tvs available?
HDR looks like it really is worth it, but i dont need 4k resolutions. Im still fine with full hd resolution.

Nah, 1080p sets are budget priced. No one is putting HDR in the low end market.
 
Not sure about the curret Tv market......are there 1080p hdr tvs available?
HDR looks like it really is worth it, but i dont need 4k resolutions. Im still fine with full hd resolution.
Probably not going to find many 1080p sets with it, but it'll have to be new ones.

4K sets are replacing 1080p ones though, you can get cheap 4K for $500-$600 already.
 
Im so disappointed with my 55X8505c... 93 ms in HDR ... :(

Why i have buy this TV ? ... :(

I tried Forza Horizon 3 in HDR and it is unplayable for me... :(
 
Top Bottom