Yep. Being afraid for my life while people are getting upset cause the mean ol essjaydoubleyoos hurt their fweelingsOkay have fun with that then.
How fun.
Yep. Being afraid for my life while people are getting upset cause the mean ol essjaydoubleyoos hurt their fweelingsOkay have fun with that then.
Agree 100%.
However, MLK wouldn't be calling Trump supporters unilaterally racists/bigots, etc.
1. Go vote.
2. Try to understand people different from you, you don't even have to agree.
3. Don't make overly broad, ridiculous generalizations.
4. Go vote.
Yep, if Dems hold the same attitude towards Trump supporters that people like Squalor have we're going to end up with Trump, again for 2020.
Stop demonizing Trump supporters. It clearly has not worked in your favor.
My state was blue. I voted for Clinton. I do care. I'm just not surprised if people react the way they do when they are labeled as racist, misogynistic, and xenophobic. I'm not arguing whether they are or they aren't. I'm just saying I get why people might have reacted the way they did.
Can you point out which posters here are the white moderates?I hope any minority reading this thread completely ignores the advice of any white moderate in here, I can hardly believe people actually think we should coddle bigots and tolerate their bigotry for votes. How much lower can white liberals really get in this election cycle I wonder.
'Why do we lose the election when we call everyone that disagrees with us even partially racist and dumb?'
The left doesn't have a monopoly on morality and truth. Get off your high horse and realise that the world is a complex place.
I'm not saying they weren't. But it shouldn't come as a shock to anyone else.Calling these people out didn't make them more deplorable. They already were.
Continue to call out the half the voters as deplorables.
Worked great so far!
Adding this to the OP/At the end of the day, it boils down to this.
Q: Why would you vote for a man who clearly is racist, has many "issues" with women, (insert 1000 other negative traits).
A: Because he said he'll lower my taxes.
That's pretty much it? Fine. You're not racist. You're not a misogynist. You're not a climate change denier, supporter of sexual assault or believer that LGBT should not have equal rights and what not.
Your're a squeaky clean, lovely person.
But why do I not get to point my finger at you for voting for a man who clearly represents and stands by those things?
Because you only cared about taxes? Or...what?
White supremacists are feeling like they're relevant now. That was BEFORE Trump even won. People WILL now face more racism in America. I've seen the result from Brexit.
RUDY GIULIANNI will likely be Attorney General........in a time where we are trying to sort out the way police treat minorities in America.
Supreme court justices will not be so favourable towards LGBT communities.
Trump can EASILY repeal executive order Obama made to allow immigrants to have genuine work and life prospects instead of hiding and taking exploitative under the table work.
You voted for a person who will do these things. Why can I not criticise you for it?
I just need to accept that you decided to fuck me over as long as you feel a guy who refuses to manufacture his goods in the USA is going to bring jobs back to the USA, because something something MLK wouldn't be getting all uppity like this?
This mindset of "hey, don't you dare look at me like that! I only like what he said about taxes/elites, that doesn't make me a racist, xenophobe, liar, con artist too!" is both confusing and infuriating.
Yeah Ive seen this narrative, and do not care for it one bit. I refuse to coddle these people. Hillary was absolutely right when she called them all deplorables. The outcome has only reinforced that fact.
What nuance is there for people's electing a man whose platform was bigotry and lies?Not all of them were deplorable. This is the problem. Youre throwing a one size fits all cap onto what is now obviously a diverse group. This conversation needs more nuance than what we're giving it.
Why this narrative that they need to be coddled? Its not this either/or thing. They just need to be included in the conversation. Its not "coddling" it's inclusiveness.Let's say for the sake of argument that every liberal just abandons Jesusland and move to the glorious blue blooded coasts (except PA, fuck them after this election), or Canada, or whatever. What happens? R holds the electoral majority in an iron grip. It could even be that the Midwest is just one long stretch of wasteland but as long as it's populated by those who vote right, the right will retain the government forever, no matter how many popular votes the left wins.
I don't want white moderates to be coddled but it's clear they have to be to make any gains.
I understand what you're saying. Basically deplorables are gonna be deplorables. There's no real solution except wait for them to matter less.I'm not saying they weren't. But it should come as a shock to anyone else.
White People are added to every conversation by default in America. When they're not the center of that conversation they get upset that they're not being included because they've been the center before.Why this narrative that they need to be coddled? Its not this either/or thing. They just need to be included in the conversation. Its not "coddling" it's inclusiveness.
Why this narrative that they need to be coddled? Its not this either/or thing. They just need to be included in the conversation. Its not "coddling" it's inclusiveness.
They were included in the conversation.Why this narrative that they need to be coddled? Its not this either/or thing. They just need to be included in the conversation. Its not "coddling" it's inclusiveness.
Why this narrative that they need to be coddled? Its not this either/or thing. They just need to be included in the conversation. Its not "coddling" it's inclusiveness.
Lunacy was a candidate listing large portions of this country as "deplorable", and expecting to win an election. It was about as tone-deaf as Mitt Romney$$.
There was plenty of faith in this system when it came to believing in Barack.
Because that is the sad reality of the world we live in. You can either come to terms with that and work on fixing it, or you can double down on what we have now proven to not work.A lot of folks here saying to think of the other side and educate. Why not think of our side, how we were told since birth that this isnt our world and in order to survive we need to understand our place as secondary to a cis white straight male? How we have to constantly, for many of us even daily try to deal with ignorant folks and bigots who refuse to learn or those who mean well but get offended easily when you try to brin up sensitive topics (just look at the pokemon gender thread on gaming to see how hostile people can get on these sensitive issues regarldess of how professional and calm the minority brought it up).
So whats more important? Her being "Right", him getting elected and undoing all of Obamas work.
Or her taking a nuanced approach, getting some of these voters in key states, and actually winning?
It was a stupid statement to make.
And that's the main problem right there. Labeling anyone who was not a fan of Clinton a racist won't get you elected.
Because his platform was more than that. It was hope for a failing economy. It was the prospect of an outsider dealing with rampant corruption. You need to step outside this echo chamber and listen to people who you don't necessarily agree with. We, as in the left, need some perspective on why this happened. And the why is more than just "this country is racist" because obviously that type of talk gets us nowhere but a Republican presidency.What nuance is there for people's electing a man whose platform was bigotry and lies?
They're learned traits based on the opinions of others. They aren't inherent in people. And I brought up Obama because you can apply your line of thinking about Trump voters to Obama and pretty much any other President in history as long as you're keen on putting everyone in a group in a nice little box.No, they aren't opinions. They are learned traits that lead to opinions.
I have read your posts just fine. You were busy blaming us for being upset, then looped in Obama, who had nothing to do with the discussion.
I hate being the guy that calls out strawman, but come on. I know you don't believe that this is what we want."Hey, I want basic human rights."
"Hey, I don't think you should get those."
"Aw shucks, I guess we'll have to disagree. You still down for the Hornets game tomorrow?"
"Hell yeah!"
*high-fives*
Yep, we're gonna make plently of progress with this strategy. I can already feel it.
I'll bite.
You need to understand their motivations. Maybe it's because green energy is leaving this miner behind and Alex Jones told him it was the muslims' fault. Maybe he believes Fox's fear-mongering about some sharia law nonsense. Maybe he's been swept up into the team sports that politics is quickly becoming. Or maybe he is actually racist. There's one possibility where he is probably irredeemable and many other possibilities where he is also a victim; he's a victim of misinformation from the Republican bullshit machine.
You can choose to listen to his story and connect as human beings (and make no mistake, this shit takes time and doesn't always work). Or you can shame him on twitter and call him a bigot on facebook, which we've seen causes him to double down and never actually work.
At the end of the day, it boils down to this.
Q: Why would you vote for a man who clearly is racist, has many "issues" with women, (insert 1000 other negative traits).
A: Because he said he'll lower my taxes.
That's pretty much it? Fine.
You're not racist. You're not a misogynist. You're not a climate change denier, supporter of sexual assault or believer that LGBT should not have equal rights and what not. You dont believe in executing the families of terrorists, giving Japan nukes, deporting basically every Syrian refugee, banning all muslims.
Your're a squeaky clean, lovely person.
But why do I not get to point my finger at you for voting for a man who clearly represents and stands by those things?
Because you only cared about taxes? Or...what?
White supremacists are feeling like they're relevant now. That was BEFORE Trump even won. People WILL now face more racism in America. I've seen the result from Brexit.
RUDY GIULIANNI will likely be Attorney General........in a time where we are trying to sort out the way police treat minorities in America.
Supreme court justices will not be so favourable towards LGBT communities.
Trump can EASILY repeal executive order Obama made to allow immigrants to have genuine work and life prospects instead of hiding and taking exploitative under the table work.
You voted for a person who will do these things. Why can I not criticise you for it?
I just need to accept that you decided to fuck me over as long as you feel a guy who refuses to manufacture his goods in the USA is going to bring jobs back to the USA, because something something MLK wouldn't be getting all uppity like this?
This mindset of "hey, don't you dare look at me like that! I only like what he said about taxes/elites, that doesn't make me a racist, xenophobe, liar, con artist too!" is both confusing and infuriating.
I already said that. His hope was lies.Because his platform was more than that. It was hope for a failing economy. It was the prospect of an outsider dealing with rampant corruption. You need to step outside this echo chamber and listen to people who you don't necessarily agree with. We, as in the left, need some perspective on why this happened. And the why is more than just "this country is racist" because obviously that type of talk gets us nowhere but a Republican presidency.
*copy, pastes, saves*
I'm basically going to quote and link to this from this point forward.
I hope any minority reading this thread completely ignores the advice of any white moderate in here, I can hardly believe people actually think we should coddle bigots and tolerate their bigotry for votes. How much lower can white liberals really get in this election cycle I wonder.
Because his platform was more than that. It was hope for a failing economy. It was the prospect of an outsider dealing with rampant corruption. You need to step outside this echo chamber and listen to people who you don't necessarily agree with. We, as in the left, need some perspective on why this happened. And the why is more than just "this country is racist" because obviously that type of talk gets us nowhere but a Republican presidency.
Because that is the sad reality of the world we live in. You can either come to terms with that and work on fixing it, or you can double down on what we have now proven to not work.
It's not fair to put this burden on you or me. But that's the sad reality of the world.
It sure as hell seems like the vibe from this thread. Either you got the guts to call bigotry what it is, or you don't. I'm not betraying everything just to appeal to someone that considers me subhuman.I hate being the guy that calls out strawman, but come on. I know you don't believe that this is what we want.
It's sad to see known minority posters, whether they are sexual or racial, basically beaten down by people in this thread and told their opinions don't matter.
You are absolutely right about this. It is 100% ignorance. But this is why they are victims, just as we are. Does their ignorance cause them to suffer as much as we minorities? Definitely not, but your hate is misplaced.Every reason you just gave that isn't outright racism can be summed as "outright ignorance". False information pumped through the same mouthpieces every four years.
I mean, that's kind of the day to day life of the American minority.
People are just showing their asses now because it's time to throw blame around, and blaming minorities is our national pastime.
"But maybe the second amendment folks maybe there's something they can do right?"
One of my co workers posted this today
Keep making the circle of "good liberals" smaller and smaller. That will do wonders I'm sure.
And I'm sure that now I'm on your bad list. Even though I support BLM, voted liberal on every ballot measure, etc., my suggestion that maybe, just maybe, a lot of white dudes in this country have it pretty bad right now, puts me on the shit-list of "white moderates who are part of the problem". And I'm not even white. I don't even look white.