Herp Derpington
Member
Of course. They design all MS hardware now.
Nice. Yeah we should be in for a treat then. I love the design of the S.
Of course. They design all MS hardware now.
Since the Wii, Nintendo has successfully removed themselves from competing (directly) with Microsoft and Sony.
As for Microsoft's current challenges. They earned it.
Next generation, we'll swing back to hubris-fuelled Sony and Microsoft will win our hearts again...and so the circle of life continues.
Sure World of Warcraft that is fucking great man, I can't see this working, when you want to push limits.
I can't play Doom on my 8 year old PC, heck I can't even play Crysis back then on Ultra with that SAME PC, haha. hmm, prepared to eat crow though when my Xbone can play Halo 7....
Yup, this isn't hard to understand.No I don't think it's an automatic home run to do forwards and backwards compatibility. By making the ps5 bc only, ps5 games can target the higher spec and demonstrate a clear distinction from the ps4. It avoids a state of perpetual cross gen development.
You're assuming MS will still be in the game if the Scorpio isn't a hit. I though last year's E3 made it perfectly clear what their game plan is if the Scorpio is a dud.
You do realize that the Xbox One is selling BETTER than the 360 was and Microsoft was VERY HAPPY and profitable with the 360? Why do you think that Microsoft is walking some fine line where they may get out of the Gaming/Console market?
Also, you do realize that besides Life Insurance, Sony's only profitable business is the PS4. Everything else Sony makes is losing money, so if they have any profitability issues with the PS4, they are in a world of hurt... Unlike Microsoft which is wildly profitable across multiple markets. (Windows 10, Windows Server, SQL, Asure, Office, Xbox, etc....)
Also, how did Microsoft make it perfectly clear that Scorpio would be a dud at E3? Everyone I know is super excited for it... Everyone I talk to at GameStop and Best Buy, etc..
Now, why is Sony not talking about PS4 Pro numbers? Why are even PS Lovers like IGN and multiple other outlets saying that there is no need to upgrade to a PS4 Pro if you already own a PS4? I know I have not interest in upgrading my PS4, where as I am defiantly getting a Scorpio.
Who knows what will happen in the future, but this kind of forward compatibility strategy over multiple generations seems incredibly risky. I'm just thinking, in the current environment, if Microsoft suddenly said that in order to release a game for XB1 that the game also had to work on the original XBOX and 360, how many third parties would simply drop XBOX all together and go PS4 exclusive? It just seems like a ridiculous demand.
You do realize that the Xbox One is selling BETTER than the 360 was and Microsoft was VERY HAPPY and profitable with the 360? Why do you think that Microsoft is walking some fine line where they may get out of the Gaming/Console market?
LOL, it's not selling better than 360 and Scorpio won't be much more powerful than Ps4 Pro, plus Pro will outsell it 4:1 next holiday.
All caps would really help make your point except, Xbox One is currently behind Xbox 360, launch aligned.
Scorpio won't be much more powerful than Ps4 Pro, plus Pro will outsell it 4:1 next holiday.
LOL, it's not selling better than 360 and Scorpio won't be much more powerful than Ps4 Pro, plus Pro will outsell it 4:1 next holiday.
Why is it that when people have nothing good to say, they just try to rag on someone's grammar or use of Caps?
You're assuming MS will still be in the game if the Scorpio isn't a hit. I though last year's E3 made it perfectly clear what their game plan is if the Scorpio is a dud.
LOL, it's not selling better than 360 and Scorpio won't be much more powerful than Ps4 Pro, plus Pro will outsell it 4:1 next holiday.
Well, actually, I corrected your erroneous claim about Xbox One sales, and took the opportunity to make fun of your use of caps.
I agree, but didn't sony all but said that generations has to have a reset and that Pro wasn't a new generation, but Ps5 would?That would be a mistake.
They didn't have a choice. If they could they would.
It's like people take real offence if you disagree on what "like to see do better" is from your perspective. There is a sort of cult thing going on via the social networks like twitter and Facebook and in my opinion it's doing more harm than good.
I'm pretty sure that's just in your imagination.
Microsoft is neck deep in hardware now and they're currently in a nice groove in that their hardware is well designed and selling well.
The only thing Microsoft has made abundantly clear is that they plan to keep making as much Microsoft hardware as possible (accessories included) and want as many Windows 10 machines out there as possible.
The biggest point is, do they have a choice with PS4? I mean, they didn't even allowed a puny overclock on the cpu side to be seen by unpatched games. I'm sure that for Ps5 going forward they will make their development environment more portable to other hardware, but that ship may have sailed for Ps4.
Ah... Can you please link to an article that says my claim is erronious? I posted a link stating that the XB One was outselling the 360 at the same point in the generation.
The Nintendo Switch enters the console market at a time when Sony is dominating with an install base of almost 55 million, and 26 million for Microsofts Xbox One.
You mistakenly linked to an article from January, 2016.
Here's more recent data:
https://www.superdataresearch.com/nintendo-switch-the-superdata-take/
For your reference, the Xbox 360 was at 28.5 million shipped at the end of 2008.
Where do we have info on this?Ah, OK. But, Microsoft is still profitable with the Xbox One , so my original point of Microsoft thinking about getting out of the game market, still stands. They are not going to get out, in fact, they are doubling down.
What ps4 titles lit charts on fire? Besides UnchartedI appreciate games sales can make up for selling consoles at a loss but we have seen time and time again xbo exclusives failing to light charts on fire and multiplatform games heavily favouring ps4 most times. How you expect them to be profitable when selling less consoles (at a loss too) and less games compared to the previous gen I don't know.
First of all I agree that both systems have had first party games underperform, it's inevitable (although Nms actually sold well but has killed all future hype for the game for most) but the difference is that Sony have tonnes more compared to Microsoft so even if they simply perform average that's still profit xbo isn't seeing all while Sony are earning more money on multiplatform games.What ps4 titles lit charts on fire? Besides Uncharted
No Mans Sky was a disaster
As was The Order
Street Fighter 5 did not live up to or even come near what someone would consider expectations
That's $120 spent off of GAF hype alone ($180 if you consider Last of Us, which I just couldn't get into, but I know it's well loved so that doesn't count what I listed earlier.)
Both camps have had their misses.
Financially one of these companies are better off than the other, then again only one of these companies is relying on their gaming division to stay a float.
Like the poster said a few dings up
There will be no next gen, it will be incremental updates with graphical choices.
Where do we have info on this?
The fact that almost immediately after initial release the xbo has been forced to rely on massive price cuts to stay at the point it currently is (trailing behind its predecessor and half the sales of its competitor) I seriously doubt the xbo is profitable all things considered.
I appreciate games sales can make up for selling consoles at a loss but we have seen time and time again xbo exclusives failing to light charts on fire and multiplatform games heavily favouring ps4 most times. How you expect them to be profitable when selling less consoles (at a loss too) and less games compared to the previous gen I don't know.
LOL, it's not selling better than 360 and Scorpio won't be much more powerful than Ps4 Pro, plus Pro will outsell it 4:1 next holiday.
Where do we have info on this?
The fact that almost immediately after initial release the xbo has been forced to rely on massive price cuts to stay at the point it currently is (trailing behind its predecessor and half the sales of its competitor) I seriously doubt the xbo is profitable all things considered.
I appreciate games sales can make up for selling consoles at a loss but we have seen time and time again xbo exclusives failing to light charts on fire and multiplatform games heavily favouring ps4 most times. How you expect them to be profitable when selling less consoles (at a loss too) and less games compared to the previous gen I don't know.
So the price did drop?....Upon release there were no price cuts, there was the removal of Kinect and a drop in price accordingly.
Upon release there were no price cuts, there was the removal of Kinect and a drop in price accordingly.
One thing i don't understand is why some people keep saying Scorpio need a good "launch line up", when i look back PS4Pro launch and find out there was no "launch line up", only games that comes with Pro patch and that's good enough for an upgrade model.
So the price did drop?....
I know you mean they simply passed on the savings so didn't necessarily lose money but I believe the initial high cost was due to the memory set up and board so dropping the Kinect May not have been enough to offset any potential loss
A price cut and a price drop are literally the same thing.
Xbox One was available for no less than $500 at launch and then, six months later, you could buy one for $400.
Wait. So you're saying that MS won't make any new games for the Scorpio that might actually take advantage of the specs? Idontbelieveyou.gifI'll help you understand in one word.....PRICE.PS4 Pro cost $400 while Scorpio will be costing more (dem specs) and upscaling older games won't fly.
MS has said Scorpio will be a "high end" system with a "high end" price so no way will they sell if they only promise older games uprezzed via patch.Sony gets away with patched pro games because price point and it was billed as emulated 4k.Now Scorpio is being pushed as native 4k console that mean games will have to be built with native 4k in mind.
so while ps4 is outselling xb1 about 2:1 you expect the ps4 pro to outsell the xbox scorpio 4:1?
where do you see that massive 100% increase come from?
or did i just miss a joke somewhere in that post?
Found this from 2015, Ken Lobb on revisiting old ip, I wonder how they are getting on with that
http://www.express.co.uk/entertainm...Dark-and-Blast-Corps-titles-Xbox-One-Xbox-360
Xbox One did not receive a price cut between November 2013/June 2014, when the Kinect was removed. The next price cut happened that December (ran until early January 2015) for a mere $50, at which point it returned to $399. I believe the next price cut was in 2016, when it finally hit $299, just before the Xbox One S released.
That's super healthy.
I think they will likely have 2-3 old IP revival announcements at E3 this year. It makes sense because they will garner a lot of goodwill with lower development costs.
Depends on price Next holiday Sony could possibly get the pro down to $300. If Scorpio launches above $400 it'll get destroyed. Holiday's people are looking for deals not looking to pay full price.
Xbox One did not receive a price cut between November 2013/June 2014, when the Kinect was removed. The next price cut happened that December (ran until early January 2015) for a mere $50, at which point it returned to $399. I believe the next price cut was in 2016, when it finally hit $299, just before the Xbox One S released.
I think they will likely have 2-3 old IP revival announcements at E3 this year. It makes sense because they will garner a lot of goodwill with lower development costs.
Where do we have info on this? [that Xbox makes a profit]
The fact that almost immediately after initial release the xbo has been forced to rely on massive price cuts to stay at the point it currently is (trailing behind its predecessor and half the sales of its competitor) I seriously doubt the xbo is profitable all things considered.
I appreciate games sales can make up for selling consoles at a loss but we have seen time and time again xbo exclusives failing to light charts on fire and multiplatform games heavily favouring ps4 most times. How you expect them to be profitable when selling less consoles (at a loss too) and less games compared to the previous gen I don't know.
XB1 w/Kinect (Nov 2013): $499
XB1 w/o Kinect (June 2014): $399
XB1 AssCreed bundle (Nov 2014): $349 (BF $329)
XB1 (Jan 2015): $399 (for two weeks)
XB1 (16th Jan 2015): $349 (indefinite extension of holiday deal after two week $399 bump)
XB1 (June 2015): $349 (official price drop)
XB1S ( Aug 2016) : $299 ( official price drop)
It's not that much different from your recollection, but the Nov 2014 to June 2015 period is poorly contextualised on your part. For one, the "mere $50" you highlighted was a $50 price drop that also included two retail AssCreed games into the package. It's less shocking now, but that was insanely good value compared to competition back in 2014 that was selling PS4s at $399 vanilla and $449 with only Destiny till BF.
Furthermore, you missed out on the fact that the $349 temporary price drop was lifted for only two weeks. In January they reinstated the $349 price deal all the way till June where they made the price drop official, but at all retail outlets and online in the US, $349 was the listing price for XB1 for the entire first half of 2015 with the exception of the first two weeks in January.
Ah dang, yeah, that's some good details. I'd forgotten that they extended the deal. Still, doesn't really change that MS wasn't exactly desperate for price drops.
It seems hard to understand to me. Pcs dont have this problem so why would consoles?Yup, this isn't hard to understand.
Well, we were talking about profitability
Anyway, right now I would argue both of the boxes are extremely profitable, perhaps less so the Xbone S compared to Ps slim because the S seems like a premium version of xbone, whilst the slim is like a cheap version of the original PS4
EDIT:
Please, take into consideration the context XD
We were talking about profitability, not market perception.
Got an email the other day saying that MS weren't going to be attending E3 this year as they have no new games in active development, they might post a video to their YouTube channel on the day where Phil and Larry have promised to eat as much flak pie as the community can throw at them.
There is no way in hell what you are saying is true....