• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Xbox Scorpio Pricing Discussion

Widge

Member
But Microsoft cant afford that luxuary. The Xbox One is being outsold 2:1.

Sony had the luxuary of making a 'premium' consonle, because their base console was still killing the competition.

MS need a console that will go out there and kill it. Not trickle out to a couple million tech enthusiasts.

399 baby.

If you're not appealing to tech enthusiasts, then there are 3 consoles competing against it, two in mass market pricing, that will play all the same games.

It's in a really awkward position.
 

Kayant

Member
Based on this thread, we can see that Microsoft's marketing tactics works. They've successfully sold the idea that the hardware is expensive and it therefore will be around 449-499 and anything less is crazy. Well done.
I mean without that it was be more expensive than the Pro which is $399 at least so 449 is next target most would think they would logically target.
 

Sony

Nintendo
PS4 used a more expensive RAM setup at launch yet was the same price as Xbox One minus Kinect. Xbox One had a UHD drive and optical port yet is priced equally or cheaper than PS4 Slim, which doesn't have those. I'm in team 399-429.
 

RowdyReverb

Member
Maybe premium price could maybe be justified if they lowered the price of the other SKUs?

$500 Scorpio
$250 One S
That's how I'm thinking. Having a less expensive Xbox option helps to mitigate the risk of launching Scorpio at a "premium" price point. I bet it will be $399 in fall of 2018 though and maybe $299 in 2020 when Xbox One is discontinued
 
It will be price no less than 499.99. Of course early adopters like myself usually ok I understand. But this console generation have seen price cuts much earlier than years past. Although I have no interest now let's see how E3 with the games department. I may benefit more waiting a year maybe two.


I have a Pro and should run till the next generation. Which could come as early as 2020.

Competition makes great allies for consumers​.
 

Bulby

Member
If you're not appealing to tech enthusiasts, then there are 3 consoles competing against it, two in mass market pricing, that will play all the same games.

It's in a really awkward position.

Sorry, I just cant see how giving a console a 'premium' price can ever work.

It didnt work for the PS3 and it didnt work for the Xbox One.

(Im not sure if you were arguing that the price will be set at a premium to appeal to enthusiasts...)
 

blakep267

Member
I'll say $429-$449. I wouldn't mind paying $500 though. That's how much I bought my OG Xbox one at and I don't really regret it
 

New002

Member
Been saying $500 ($499) since the start, so I'll stick with that. I don't think they can afford to price it higher than that.
 
That's how I'm thinking. Having a less expensive Xbox option helps to mitigate the risk of launching Scorpio at a "premium" price point. I bet it will be $399 in fall of 2018 though and maybe $299 in 2020 when Xbox One is discontinued

I'd agree with this if Microsoft didn't have any competition, but I just can't see them pricing above the PS4 Pro and staying that way. With the pricing you've detailed above, Scorpio would consistently be at least $100 more than the Pro even as both drop in price.

$399-standard controller/1TB HDD
$499-elite controller/2TB or higher HDD

I can absolutely see a $499 SKU that's a "day one edition" or something and comes with a 2TB harddrive. I don't think they'd give us an Elite controller with it though.
 

RowdyReverb

Member
Sorry, I just cant see how giving a console a 'premium' price can ever work.

It didnt work for the PS3 and it didnt work for the Xbox One.
The difference in this situation from those examples is that they'll still have an inexpensive console offering in the Xbox One S that can play the same games
 

Ushay

Member
I think the base model will be equivalent to a 480 card so around $400-$500. My thinking is that the target audience are the PC gamers, graphics enthusiasts and core console gamers.

MS aren't in a leading position, so I doubt they will price too high, but this is a premium device. I think it will be marked up $150 higher than Xbox One S.

If it lands between those numbers I'm sure it will review very well.

Remember it is utilising Polaris and Jaguar at its core but highly customised deriving a lot of the cost from R&D, so the silicon shouldn't cost vastly more than a Pro. The wildcards are the cooling assembly and extra memory.
 

paulogy

Member
I think it could easily be five hundred and ninety nine US dollars, but they'd have to be absolutely bonkers to offer a console at that price. I think they'd have to go $549 or $499 and eat the cost for a bit.
 

Widge

Member
Sorry, I just cant see how giving a console a 'premium' price can ever work.

It didnt work for the PS3 and it didnt work for the Xbox One.

Or the PS4Pro.

It may work when PS5 & XBwhatevernext come along and the base models get wiped out. People can step up to the next layer of machines which can all play the games, and suddenly Microsoft have the chief box there.

It's all a bit weird really, none of us can really tell how this entire mid-gen/incremental thing will pan out.

I still think MS might play a wildcard in sacrificing their XB1s margins to offset the Scorpio price and come in surprisingly cheap in a hope of securing enough of a market to wrest multiplatform control away from Sony. And it's that which they need, their entire software development strategy shows that they planned on being the machine of choice for all titles... they can't fall back on an "exclusives box" like the PS3 did or Nintendo can.
 

Bulby

Member
The difference in this situation from those examples is that they'll still have an inexpensive console offering in the Xbox One S that can play the same games

But no one is buying that console. Yes I know that is a massive exaggeration, Im sure you get the point
 
I'll say $429-$449. I wouldn't mind paying $500 though.

and that's why it will be $500 and not some increment lower. Why price it at $429 or $449 when everyone who would be in at either of those prices would likely buy at $500 as well?

Phil Spencer is running a business, not a charity.
 

RowdyReverb

Member
I think it could easily be five hundred and ninety nine US dollars, but they'd have to be absolutely bonkers to offer a console at that price. I think they'd have to go $549 or $499 and eat the cost for a bit.
Above $500 for a console is no-man's-land since the PS3. It won't happen
 

Crackbone

Member
449$-499$, it's a box to appease the long term xbox gamer as a premium option.

If the price is 399$ that's a statement that they are still in the console game long term and want to build some momentum going into next gen.

Frankly I could see it going either way, and I think it really depends on what their long term console plans are.
 
Four hundred and ninety-nine US dollars.

Microsoft has been clear that it isn't intended to be a mass-market product at the outset and they are not averse to having a premium option at a corresponding price point. See: the Elite controller.

I agree with this perspective. I don't see MS - or any console manufacturer - selling a console at a significant loss, so $399 seems nearly impossible. Couple that with the "premium" commentary and the fact that they were tremendously successful selling a controller for nearly 3x the normal price, and $499 looks very likely.
 

Lucreto

Member
$399 if they want to sell at a loss.

I say $499

Spencer said it would sell at a premium. $399 is the standard price so it will certainly be more.
 
$399.

Don't see why it would be more than that, especially if they want it to appeal to folks outside the core Xbox base.
It's not a console with better graphics that will appeal to people outside the core Xbox base.
The mainstream cares about price and games. For many people, down-sampling and x16 AF doesn't mean a thing. Why would they pay $399 for a console when they could pay $199 for another that has more games and will still play the new Call Of Duty/FIFA/Madden?
 
$399 if they want to sell at a loss.

I say $499

Spencer said it would sell at a premium. $399 is the standard price so it will certainly be more.

To play devil's advocate here, "premium" doesn't have to mean that it's above your "standard" pricing. Putting Scorpio at $399 while dropping the price of the One S would sell the idea of it being a "premium" SKU.
 
They definitely aren't going to have more than one SKU of the Scorpio. No way.

I still think MS might play a wildcard in sacrificing their XB1s margins to offset the Scorpio price and come in surprisingly cheap in a hope of securing enough of a market to wrest multiplatform control away from Sony. And it's that which they need, their entire software development strategy shows that they planned on being the machine of choice for all titles... they can't fall back on an "exclusives box" like the PS3 did or Nintendo can.

The Scorpio of all things isn't going to ever sell as much as the XB1 S, let alone a Pro or a PS4. It will not wrest control of multiplatform titles from Sony, who is selling 2:1 right now.
 

Nictel

Member
$499 if they are treating it as an isolated self sustaining console.
$399 if they are planning on offsetting losses against continued sales of the more mass market XB1s.

Biggest risk = PS4 is the mass market darling and will continue to be so, putting the second option as a potential gamble. They may settle somewhere in the middle as a result.

I dont believe general management / shareholders will allow them to sell it at a loss. Similar to the Xbox One this will sell at a profit or break even. I can't see them going below $449,-
 

Curufinwe

Member
Maybe you start at $450, let the hardcore early adopters pay thru the nose, then drop it to $400 early next year to appeal to a wider audience?
 
It's not a console with better graphics that will appeal to people outside the core Xbox base.
The mainstream cares about price and games. For many people, down-sampling and x16 AF doesn't mean a thing. Why would they pay $399 for a console when they could pay $199 for another that has more games and will still play the new Call Of Duty/FIFA/Madden?
Because one will actually be marketed as "best console on the market"

Why would you want something that's not giving you the best quality?
 

Vanillalite

Ask me about the GAF Notebook
I don't think the chipset or the custom design of it really is gonna be that much more expensive than the Pro.

What IS more expensive is that extra ram and the cooling setup. I just don't know how much more expensive, and if MS is willing to eat some margins.
 

Chamber

love on your sleeve
$499

The $399 predictions sound like the kind of optimism that had people thinking Switch was going to be $199 (myself included).
 

Widge

Member
I dont believe general management / shareholders will allow them to sell it at a loss. Similar to the Xbox One this will sell at a profit or break even. I can't see them going below $449,-

This is why I think they may pitch it as an entire wooden dollars situation. XB1 continues to sell well, Scorpio sells less and takes a hit but hit absorbed by XB1 sales. When Scorpio starts to take over in earnest, hardware costs are cheaper and break even achieved.
 
Top Bottom