Statistically speaking, those results right now (40/43/42) are infuriating.
. . .and STARFIELD for sure. FF16 is immediately out of the question, so it's between STARFIELD and ZELDA. If ZELDA had, up to this point, communicated at all that we were getting a return to form, I'd pick it easily. But TOTK looks just like BOTW2 with little, if any, real innovation (and no adding on to the existing world interaction systems don't cut it) which is great for people who loved BOTW, and not for those wishing for a return to WW.
So that just leaves STARFIELD which looks like more empty headed, come on in and get lost in this new open world of ours, game from BETHESDA. And as I have an empty head myself - I'm all in on the hype (I'll gorge what I can on BG3 in a week in prep of moving over to another gigantic RPG).
Starfield as Bethesda RPG's are played for decades and this time we have a whole universe to explore, nothing comes close.
Completely forgot about the settlements system and how much of a time sink that will provide with the large amount of creative space in STARFIELD. I sunk an absurd amount of time into settlements in FO4 (playing a game with no fast travel and on max difficulty, so having to effectively use the settlement system was a must), which - lets be real - was only really half baked for what they were trying to do in the game. After seeing what other have done in the modding space of FO4, I am absolutely certain we are going to get their implementation and more of NMS within a "BETHESDA openworld RPG" (advanced, FREELANCER style, trading at is a must at MINIMUM).