• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Major Nelson/MS issues an official statement regarding Used Games on XBox One

UberTag

Member
It doesn't matter what they say.

A shit sandwich is still a shit sandwich even if you tell me it's caviar.
Let's just hope Sony doesn't follow suit... otherwise, we'll be choosing between these two guys in November...

giant-douche-and-turd-sandwich.jpg
 
that's kinda my point.

everyone is gathering up their torches and pitchforks and ready to burn MS at the stake when in all likelihood Sony has similar policy plans
The likelihood is really up in the air though isn't it? Why are we only hearing bad rumors about the xbox and not the PS4? The ONLY smoke on the PS4 side is silence.

So yeah, you might be right on the mark and Sony is biding its time before announcing the same policies, but I don't know why you think that is so likely.
 
*Sony's E3 Press Conference*

*Sizzle reel*
*Tretton takes the stage*
"PS4 plays used games without you having to buy a license."
"PS4 doesn't require you to connect to the Internet at regular intervals."
"You can resell PS4 games whenever you like, to whomever you want, and for whatever price you choose."
*Tretton drops mic and walks off*

/E3
 
The likelihood is really up in the air though isn't it? Why are we only hearing bad rumors about the xbox and not the PS4? The ONLY smoke on the PS4 side is silence.

So yeah, you might be right on the mark and Sony is biding its time before announcing the same policies, but I don't know why you think that is so likely.

Microsoft had all those rumors while Sony didn't had any of that. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised by any direction they take.
 
*Sony's E3 Press Conference*

*Sizzle reel*
*Tretton takes the stage*
"PS4 plays used games without you having to buy a license."
"PS4 doesn't require you to connect to the Internet at regular intervals."
"You can resell PS4 games whenever you like, to whomever you want, and for whatever price you choose."
*Tretton drops mic and walks off*

/E3

IMG_9858.gif
 
Eh, you really don't have to pull the "dramatic much' nonsense. And while, sure, you, didnt expect games, this is a gaming forum. And many, many, gamers, expected games to be part of a video game console reveal. As shown with people renouncing microsoft, and writting open letters, you do understand that this is a fact for many seasoned gamers? That they'd look forward to games on their gaming system?

The reveal was a failure because it alienated a large demographic that made the Xbox Brand what it is today.

You being worried about sony is probably the same problem you had with a video game console reveal not having any solid gaming information about it. There are others that know that sony said their console is designed for people without internet - in mind.

All the gaming press outlets weren't expecting much in the way of games at tuesdays event so I guess it comes down to me being more informed about it than you.

The only gamers they've alienated are the ones who are having a knee jerk reaction to a policy that's not even clearly set in stone yet.

All I'm saying is wait until E3 until we have more definitive specifics of what both Sony and MS have planned.
 
"Wiggle room?" Not if they've already started signing contracts with publishers regarding who gets what cut from the resale of a used game.

All of that is backroom stuff. I meant "wiggle room" to the end user. There's no Xbox One systems or games available for me to buy yet, so them elaborating or not elaborating now doesn't change anything for a consumer.

When the system is actually out, that's when all the policies ultimately matter. Of course, that doesn't mean people can't discuss it, but just that things like making final purchasing decisions are kind of meaningless right now.
 
it wasn't particularly traumatic - I liked a lot of what they showed, but not a lot of what they said.

But their coms have been a complete joke... a real mess.

Is Ken Kutaragi heading up Xbox now?

Okay, I have a feeling I'm way late to the party, but what's with all the 'Only on Xbox' avatars? Didn't really think much of them when I saw them sparingly. But I've been on NeoGAF a bunch since the announcement, and it seems a bit odd. What did I miss?
 

sublimit

Banned
that's kinda my point.

everyone is gathering up their torches and pitchforks and ready to burn MS at the stake when in all likelihood Sony has similar policy plans

Why Sony should bother speaking now?They weren't the ones that fucked up by having employers saying random shit to the media.

MS fucked up so the sooner they are upfront about it the better for them.
 

farisr

Member
Okay, I have a feeling I'm way late to the party, but what's with all the 'Only on Xbox' avatars? Didn't really think much of them when I saw them sparingly. But I've been on NeoGAF a bunch since the announcement, and it seems a bit odd. What did I miss?

There were a lot more leading up to the announcement. A bunch of them were gone/changed back after the event.

It was just a little fun that started in a discussion in the xbox reveal countdown thread, I believe. Spread quite a bit.
 

Mindwipe

Member
I imagine it's not much fun for Larry at the moment being told to type out this embarrassing crap.

Shame the idiots who've taken these decisions haven't got the balls to face the music on it.
 
The likelihood is really up in the air though isn't it? Why are we only hearing bad rumors about the xbox and not the PS4? The ONLY smoke on the PS4 side is silence.

So yeah, you might be right on the mark and Sony is biding its time before announcing the same policies, but I don't know why you think that is so likely.

I think Sony's silence is kinda telling and the way they danced around the subject at their event in february.

It begs the question though if Sony doesn't do this what kind of support will they get from publishers? Do they run the risk of being shunned like EA with WiiU if they don't support some kind of tariff on used games?
 
that's kinda my point.

everyone is gathering up their torches and pitchforks and ready to burn MS at the stake when in all likelihood Sony has similar policy plans
You don't go after people who you think might do something wrong. If Sony comes out with the same practices then I'm sure there will still be plenty of pitchforks to go around. But until then there's no reason to give Sony backlash just because we think they might do it. No matter how likely it is that they will.
 
Why Sony should bother speaking now?They weren't the ones that fucked up by having employers saying random shit to the media.

MS fucked up so the sooner they are upfront about it the better for them.

so its okay for sony to charge fees for used games but only if they don't tell consumers about it?

uhh okay
 
*Sony's E3 Press Conference*

*Sizzle reel*
*Tretton takes the stage*
"PS4 plays used games without you having to buy a license."
"PS4 doesn't require you to connect to the Internet at regular intervals."
"You can resell PS4 games whenever you like, to whomever you want, and for whatever price you choose."
*Tretton drops mic and walks off*

/E3

Thing is, Sony knows they'll be doing all the same stuff within another generation, so they aren't going to bash it. Everyone has known for a good ten years that the industry will eliminate/control resale and ultimately go online-only.
 
I think MS were sitting back in a room. Mattrick with his aviators and Top Gun Jacket and Larry with his guitar singing 'we can do this together' feet up a bottle of Bollinger celebrating there reveal slipped Gaf and IGN on .......and thought fuck me what have we done................they went from Tom Cruise and Sting to Abbott and Costello.

Got a feeling were gonna get the Console we want not but not what we deserve.
 

farisr

Member
I think Sony's silence is kinda telling and the way they danced around the subject at their event in february.

It begs the question though if Sony doesn't do this what kind of support will they get from publishers? Do they run the risk of being shunned like EA with WiiU if they don't support some kind of tariff on used games?

Sony has already clarified one of the issues (online requirement to play games - there is none).

The other stuff they've been vague on and could very well be the same, but nothing is there to indicate so, unlike in MS' case where there is tons of reports, and statements by employees. You don't bash and complain if nothing of the sort has been indicated, in Microsoft's case, it has.

Anyways, I really doubt publishers like EA would think benefiting from a relatively small percentage of users paying for their content twice/getting a small cut of used games sales would be better than the amount of money they can make by having the same game ported to a sony console (with minimal effort due to the architecture).
 
I think Sony's silence is kinda telling and the way they danced around the subject at their event in february.

It begs the question though if Sony doesn't do this what kind of support will they get from publishers? Do they run the risk of being shunned like EA with WiiU if they don't support some kind of tariff on used games?
Oh yeah, the questions are good ones. I just don't see it being as likely as some others do, because there really isn't much smoke. But one can make a fine indirect argument.
 
that's kinda my point.

everyone is gathering up their torches and pitchforks and ready to burn MS at the stake when in all likelihood Sony has similar policy plans



easy junior no need for name calling

all the games press outlets weren't expecting much in the way of games so I guess I was more informed than you going into the event

I wasn't name calling! I was just being sarcastic. Wasn't really calling anyone a dumbass. And yeah, they said that a couple of days before the event, doesn't make it right. It's still a game console.
 
I think I know how they got to that 40% positive, 40% neutral, 20% negative number they mentioned earlier, hah.

the damage to the brand must be crazy at this point though.

a guy at work mentioned it today and he is a very casual Xbox owner... He said he "wasn't fussed" about getting it because he likes to trade things in
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
How many times can you possibly release a statement to clarify the situation and not clarify anything? They're doing it every 6 hours at this point.
 

Mxrz

Member
"Here's some bullshit. Its not our official bullshit, but we'll be revealing that bullshit at a later date. But its the same bullshit cause we already signed the deals. But dont think about it."
 

commedieu

Banned
All the gaming press outlets weren't expecting much in the way of games at tuesdays event so I guess it comes down to me being more informed about it than you.

The only gamers they've alienated are the ones who are having a knee jerk reaction to a policy that's not even clearly set in stone yet.

All I'm saying is wait until E3 until we have more definitive specifics of what both Sony and MS have planned.

There is a need to keep the idea that gamers are upset at the unknown. Not just for your post, but in general, people keep trying to make a case that there is nothing to be upset about. There are many problems with the XboxOne outside of the unknown policy. But seeing as how you're not even mentioning that, I can't really go much further.
 

P90

Member
"Here's some bullshit. Its not our official bullshit, but we'll be revealing that bullshit at a later date. But its the same bullshit cause we already signed the deals. But dont think about it."

Thank you. Much better than what I would have come up with.
 

ZeroCDR

Member
The fact that their are "policies" to begin with is the problem, no matter how inaccurate or incomplete they may be.
 
Thanks Larry and will you now keep quite until you have something useful to say?

MS endless spinning pisses me off. "Everything is in the clouds" takes the cake.
 

140.85

Cognitive Dissonance, Distilled
It's our fault were jumping to conclusions. Yeah...our fault. Blame the listener MS. It's not like you had a month+ of internet rumblings, leaks/Adam Orth situations to make it clear you needed to be very specific about all this on the 21st.

This week. Wow. This is becoming a farce. I keep expecting it to end but it just keeps rollin'.
 

Kifimbo

Member
If Sony is planning to use a similar scheme, why isn't there any rumour ? Surely someone would have spilled the beans. But no, all the rumors since the start of the year are about Microsoft.
 
This lends further credence to my personal theory that they were floating ideas out there to see what the reception was. Hopefully they heard the reception load and clear.

There are easier and safer ways to do this.
They could have made public comments months ago and gauged people's reactions and adjusted.
I mean, look at the whole Adam Orth debacle.

They have been designing every aspect of the XBox One for the last couple of years. Things like 'internet connection required', the used game strategy, Kinect must always be on, etc. are serious components in the overall foundation of the X1; ones that I hope were batted around in internal meetings and conference calls ad nauseum. A ho-hum "Oh gosh! We had no idea people would be so upset about this" attitude is either: insulting to consumers' intelligence or inexcusably ignorant. Either one is troubling.

Using a reveal event, with all eyes on you, less than a month from (one of) the largest consumer entertainment shows in the world, as an opportunity to 'float ideas out there' just seems comically incompetent to me.
Even if E3 is now ALL ABOUT TEH GAMEZ, there are still a shit ton of questions from their reveal mess to answer. The whole thing just seems like a PR nightmare right now.
 
Top Bottom