• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Major Nelson denies eSRAM Issues with Xbone, CBOAT: "nope"

Typical NeoGAF form. Mysterious source says something bad, everybody believes him. Known Microsoft PR guy says it's not true, everybody questions him.

Known Microsoft PR guy who lies to the public:

http://majornelson.com/2005/05/20/xbox-360-vs-ps3-part-1-of-4/

Major Nelson said:
Xbox 360 has 278.4 GB/s of memory system bandwidth. The PS3 has less than one-fifth of Xbox 360′s (48 GB/s) of total memory system bandwidth.

Riiiight...
 

Mindwipe

Member
But why would a Microsoft insider deliberately destroy his companies reputation and in the worst of all cases lead to the shuttering of Xbox?

Lead to the shuttering of Xbox... lol.

CBOAT said this was due to incompetent managers. I imagine his motivation is that he wants the Xbox division to be successful, but believes this can only happen if the truth comes out about this situation sooner rather than later and therefore start fixing it sooner (and getting better leaders).
 
Here is Major Nelson for you:


"Our world class technology team looked at the numbers and claims and decided to do what everyone else does: compare them to the PS3. The difference it that these guys are uniquely qualified to do so, and can cut through the smoke and mirrors to see what the real deal is.

There are three critical performance aspects of a console:

Central Processing Unit (CPU) performance.
The Xbox 360 CPU architecture has three times the general purpose processing power of the Cell.

Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) performance
The Xbox 360 GPU design is more flexible and it has more processing power than the PS3 GPU.

Memory System Bandwidth
The memory system bandwidth in Xbox 360 exceeds the PS3′s by five times.

Xbox 360 has 278.4 GB/s of memory system bandwidth. The PS3 has less than one-fifth of Xbox 360′s (48 GB/s) of total memory system bandwidth.

CONCLUSION
When you break down the numbers, Xbox 360 has provably more performance than PS3. Keep in mind that Sony has a track record of over promising and under delivering on technical performance. The truth is that both systems pack a lot of power for high definition games and entertainment.

However, hardware performance, while important, is only a third of the puzzle. Xbox 360 is a fusion of hardware, software and services. Without the software and services to power it, even the most powerful hardware becomes inconsequential. Xbox 360 games ”by leveraging cutting-edge hardware, software, and services” will outperform the PlayStation 3."

http://majornelson.com/2005/05/20/xbox-360-vs-ps3-part-1-of-4/


---
He certainly knows how to bend the truth. CBOAT all the way for me.
 

BlueSteel

Member
I've just been observing this from afar, but taking a look at cboat's posting, the dude got a ton of things right. You can chalk it up to chance once or twice, but the dude is consistently good. I trust him.
 

v1oz

Member
Major Nelson is just a PR guru. He might not even be privy to what's going on day-to-day at an external contractor's overseas manufacturing fab. Most this stuff gets outsourced, unless he's directly involved with in the discussions with TSMC and Flextronics, he wont know nothing.
 

enzo_gt

tagged by Blackace
The guy didn't even link to the thread/rumour. Vague answer to vague question, Major Nelson in the argumentative clear and if caught lying he can just say it was a different rumour. Not much to this thread or his response.
 

EGM1966

Member
Typical NeoGAF form. Mysterious source says something bad, everybody believes him. Known Microsoft PR guy says it's not true, everybody questions him.

I have to ask, if you leave this specific example aside, do you in general accept PR statements as likely to be true?

I'm not saying he is lying, I'm saying he is PR. I work for a very large global company - think not much smaller than MS - and I look at what our PR says publicly then I look at what I know inside the company. You might not want to be quite so trusting. Just saying.
 

Clear

CliffyB's Cock Holster
pieatorium said:
apu is larger for xbox so that part will be more expensive either way, if it's also got yield problems then it's not technically an increase to the bom of a single box but will be extra sunk costs related to unusable chips.

How can it be a sunk cost when what we're talking about is a component that needs to be procured for every assembled unit? This is a manufacturing issue pure and simple, if yields go up, prices come down.
 

Xater

Member
For a guy that also said they are listening, nothing much came out of it. I trust Cboat more, his track record is better.
 
Here is Major Nelson for you:


"Our world class technology team looked at the numbers and claims and decided to do what everyone else does: compare them to the PS3. The difference it that these guys are uniquely qualified to do so, and can cut through the smoke and mirrors to see what the real deal is.

There are three critical performance aspects of a console:

Central Processing Unit (CPU) performance.
The Xbox 360 CPU architecture has three times the general purpose processing power of the Cell.

Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) performance
The Xbox 360 GPU design is more flexible and it has more processing power than the PS3 GPU.

Memory System Bandwidth
The memory system bandwidth in Xbox 360 exceeds the PS3′s by five times.

Xbox 360 has 278.4 GB/s of memory system bandwidth. The PS3 has less than one-fifth of Xbox 360′s (48 GB/s) of total memory system bandwidth.

CONCLUSION
When you break down the numbers, Xbox 360 has provably more performance than PS3. Keep in mind that Sony has a track record of over promising and under delivering on technical performance. The truth is that both systems pack a lot of power for high definition games and entertainment.

However, hardware performance, while important, is only a third of the puzzle. Xbox 360 is a fusion of hardware, software and services. Without the software and services to power it, even the most powerful hardware becomes inconsequential. Xbox 360 games ”by leveraging cutting-edge hardware, software, and services” will outperform the PlayStation 3."

http://majornelson.com/2005/05/20/xbox-360-vs-ps3-part-1-of-4/


---
He certainly knows how to bend the truth. CBOAT all the way for me.

LOL! WTF.
Ive believed CBoat since the minute he revealed the yield issues.
#TeamCBOAT

I dont trust suits or the lackeys they pay to wax lies over to consumers!
 

Caja 117

Member
I have to ask, if you leave this specific example aside, do you in general accept PR statements as likely to be true?

I'm not saying he is lying, I'm saying he is PR. I work for a very large global company - think not much smaller than MS - and I look at what our PR says publicly then I look at what I know inside the company. You might not want to be quite so trusting. Just saying.

Same here, I worked at a Global corporation, one of the largest in the planet, and a lot of PR stuff that were used to put out fires, were not a direct reflection on what was going on behind door.

Heck PR department knew jack about the services my former unit works with and they always had the most Beautiful communications prepared for the costumers.

As a low level official in that company, I Wasn't allowed to discuss such topic with customers, that was up to the unit head and PR department.
 

artist

Banned
What do we make of Aaron Greenberg refuting the same rumor?
1. Microsoft will never publicly admit to yield issues just like another corp (Sony, AMD, Nvidia ..)
2. Greenberg didnt refute this, some one linked Ami's post and he's saying not true. To what exactly?
 
What do we make of Aaron Greenberg refuting the same rumor?

I dont doubt MS Moneyhats. They will buy PR from EA/Ubi/Activision to support them, so much so at this rate, even if they had the Pope come up to do damage control, I wont trust them.

I have major trust issues with MS and their mouthpieces.
 

RoboPlato

I'd be in the dick
I do find it a funny coincidence that the day after the rumors of the downgrade started was when CryTek finally announce CE3 is ready for PS4 and that they will be making games for it themselves.
 

Rashid

Banned
Well, Larry here wouldn't want the negative publicity going into their billion dollar investment for the next several years, so if course he'd lie. If consumers think that it's difficult to make, then they'll think it'll break easily too. So even if it is true which it must likely is with their stupid convoluted design, they'd lie.
 

Haggis

Banned
This place is a joke. You all want one company to fail so badly over the other instead of just wanting good games to play.
 

avaya

Member
This place is a joke. You all want one company to fail so badly over the other instead of just wanting good games to play.

Yes that is exactly what is going on.

We should always trust the PR man. We should be happy to give up our consumer rights. We should worship a company for even giving us games to play.
 
Sorry, but I'm not going to trust a PR guy over an insider who has been spot on so far. Major Nelson has flat out lied before. Of course he isn't going to confirm this.
 

Haggis

Banned
Yes that is exactly what is going on.

We should always trust the PR man. We should be happy to give up our consumer rights. We should worship a company for even giving us games to play.

You wait until after E3 and see if Sony is doing similar things because I bet they will. I believe this all stems from the big publishers like Activision and EA UBI.

As for the ESRAM issue Larry wouldn't say a damn thing if it were true but most people on this board just want MS to fail so badly.

I am not a fan of any DRM for either console as it will limits my ability for used games sale and purchases but it like any normal consumer I will just vote with my wallet.

Like most normal consumers I am going to wait until I have all the details from both Sony and MS to decide if I get one or both or neither. But people in this thread and others have just gone out of their way to bash MS all based on rumors and taking them as facts. And then try to spin it in Sony's favor when XBOX PR man says otherwise to a rumor.

Really is a joke around here.
 

Chairman Yang

if he talks about books, you better damn well listen
This place is a joke. You all want one company to fail so badly over the other instead of just wanting good games to play.
Let's say you're right, and that all GAFfers want MS to fail.

Why do you think that is? Did GAF--collectively--just arbitrarily decide to hate MS for no concrete reason?
 

robochimp

Member
This place is a joke. You all want one company to fail so badly over the other instead of just wanting good games to play.


We want a company to fail at monetizing every move we make in our living room.

If they want to go pure digital and have all the DRM fine. If they want to maintain their relationships with retailers by selling physical products plus wanting to treat every consumer like a criminal, it isn't OK.
 
This place is a joke. You all want one company to fail so badly over the other instead of just wanting good games to play.

I am sorry but your post is a joke, 99% people here doesn't want xbone to fail, because monopoly in console market, or any market doesn't innovate things or pushes forward. As an x360 owner, if MS continues with their agenda, I will not support them in this anti-consumer shitt. If PS4 is to be anti-consumer as xbone is, then they also wont get my support. But until we hear otherwise from Sony, xbone is getting all the negativity.
 
Seems that way. Sony fans are the majority on this board that is certain.

Seems that way? Don't you see all the anti consumer moves by MS with Xbone?

And Sony fans are the majority on this board? I wouldn't make those claims so lightly while still being a junior.

Edit: Too late...
 

XeNoN89

Banned
Seems that way. Sony fans are the majority on this board that is certain.

Actually it's the opposite. I would say all these people who want Microsoft to succeed with the XB1 as it is currently are anti-games and anti-gamer. People are attacking Microsoft for a reason. They are trying to screw over the consumers completely.
 

Mpl90

Two copies sold? That's not a bomb guys, stop trolling!!!
Don't worry, guys. He's gone now.

#teamCBOAT. Obviously.
 

Valkyria

Banned
You wait until after E3 and see if Sony is doing similar things because I bet they will. I believe this all stems from the big publishers like Activision and EA UBI.

As for the ESRAM issue Larry wouldn't say a damn thing if it were true but most people on this board just want MS to fail so badly.

I am not a fan of any DRM for either console as it will limits my ability for used games sale and purchases but it like any normal consumer I will just vote with my wallet.

Like most normal consumers I am going to wait until I have all the details from both Sony and MS to decide if I get one or both or neither. But people in this thread and others have just gone out of their way to bash MS all based on rumors and taking them as facts. And then try to spin it in Sony's favor when XBOX PR man says otherwise to a rumor.

Really is a joke around here.

What is it a joke, is that Microsoft is spending money on people like you as it would change anybody's mind about this shit storm.

EDIT: Man, that ban came really fast.
 

Shambles

Member
Why wouldn't you automatically disbelieve anything a PR mouthpiece says? Him denying it only confirms what cboat is saying. If came out and said they were having yield issues I'd still not believe him and say that cboat was wrong.
 
Top Bottom