• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

famousmortimer: Xbox One OS and Xbox Live issues bouncing about as we approach launch

Status
Not open for further replies.
I shudder to think what PSN would look like if Live never existed.

I actually much preferred console gaming pre-online multiplayer. It was much more focused on deep single player experiences and there was much more room in the market for great mid-tier games.

Yes, I'd say I loved old school local console gaming with its emphasis on every genre other than First Person Shooters (and shooters in general). See the King: PS2. Also: NES, Super NES/Genesis, NeoGeo, Playstation 1. Nintendo 64, and Dreamcast.

Now that they do exist, I agree. Live has pushed the envelope in that space since its inception.
 

SuperD77

Banned
Nope! Nothing wrong with wanting a company to fail if you believe they are a detrimental influence on your hobby. The Xbone initial reveal and policies have just shown gamers their true colors and how little they regard consumer rights.


Microsoft is a bad influence on the gaming industry and I'd love to see the Xbone fail.

While I can respect your opinion, i think this seems fairly short sighted. I think its good for gamers to have a company with the resources of Microsoft in the industry to push things forward even if you don't always agree with the direction.

Also, competition is ALWAYS a good thing for every industry. Take the DRM stuff that Microsoft that seems to have lost them the hearts of a lot of core games, it's widely suspected that Sony was considering a similar scheme, but as a result of competition they saw an opportunity there to take a different approach as a point of distinction from their competitor. If it was just Sony do you think that maybe, possibly they may have gone in a different direction? Sony's historical record on DRM is not exactly spotless when you consider stuff like the rootkit fiasco. Would the #NoDRM campaign have been as successfu if gamers had no other option other than PC or Nintendo handhelds?

Would Sony be pouring as much money into exclusive titles from Naughty Dog and their other studios if there wasn't a Microsoft breathing down their neck? Would they have made anywhere near the amount of studio investments as they did last gen? Sony is not exactly rolling in revenue right now. Exclusives exist solely to create incentive to purchase a particular system. Why would Sony need as many of them if there wasn't a strong competitor, they could just rely on the major publisher to role out content and keep reeling in that licensing revenue.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
LIVE was the greatest thing to happen to PSN, it lit a fire under Sony's ass find a way to compete and a improved online infrastructure and PS+ was born

MS failing would be devastating for this industry, it would take years for someone else to fill the void which would allow Sony maintain status quo

a company should be recognised for its successes, especially when it raises the bar for everyone. But that doesn't give them a free pass.

there is nothing wrong with a temporary monopoly (as unlikely as that is). We've had it before and new competition has emerged.
 

Faustek

Member
Isn't Steam a monopoly on PC?
Sony wasn't too bad with the PS2. Except for the arrogance that came as result of its domination at the launch of the ps3.

Oh god no. Far from it. Pc is the most competitive market there is when it comes to gaming.

GoG
GMG
Amazon
Origin
NotOnsteam
Desura
Playism
Rice

literally a ton more different sites selling Dl codes or you can download from them directly and some, as GMG, even sell codes at sometimes a reduced price than Steam even if you have to use Steam for the code you bought.. So No Steam Does Not Have Monopoly.

They have the biggest chunk of the userbase thou. Understandable since they been in the game for so long and have been giving a good service and good price so far. A very easy DRM solution(SteamWorks, remember this, DRM free is still on Steam just that many chose to deploy Steams DRM solution called SteamWorks) that haven't really messed with the userbase.

So I say it again, NO Steam Does Not Have Monopoly.
 
I have just updated my THREAD SUMMARY with some of verendus's newer comments (found at bottom in PS4 section)

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=87786946#post87786946

Specifically

No, I'm pretty sure a Holiday launch is fine for the PS4. Nothing out of the ordinary with its path.

There are no big issues. Just minor crap that is part of the game.

Please let me know if there is more news to be added

I had to grab some sleep :(
 
hector-salamanca-o.gif
wow I just saw that episode yesterday, incredible fitting
 

Verendus

Banned
Take the DRM stuff that Microsoft that seems to have lost them the hearts of a lot of core games, it's widely suspected that Sony was considering a similar scheme, but as a result of competition they saw an opportunity there to take a different approach as a point of distinction from their competitor. If it was just Sony do you think that maybe, possibly they may have gone in a different direction? Sony's historical record on DRM is not exactly spotless when you consider stuff like the rootkit fiasco. Would the #NoDRM campaign have been as successfu if gamers had no other option other than PC or Nintendo handhelds?
Suspected by morons, yes.
 
Oh god no. Far from it. Pc is the most competitive market there is when it comes to gaming.

GoG
GMG
Amazon
Origin
NotOnsteam
Desura
Playism
Rice

literally a ton more different sites selling Dl codes or you can download from them directly and some, as GMG, even sell codes at sometimes a reduced price than Steam even if you have to use Steam for the code you bought.. So No Steam Does Not Have Monopoly.

They have the biggest chunk of the userbase thou. Understandable since they been in the game for so long and have been giving a good service and good price so far. A very easy DRM solution(SteamWorks, remember this, DRM free is still on Steam just that many chose to deploy Steams DRM solution called SteamWorks) that haven't really messed with the userbase.

So I say it again, NO Steam Does Not Have Monopoly.

Just want to say that i love GMG and Amazon, but i redeem steam keys from them .
 

see5harp

Member
Agreed.

I have no sympathy for the Microsoft position as it stands. They've created this bed.

They need to stop with the sidestepping of questions and just be honest about the current situation and what they are going to do to fix it.

I honestly think that would go quite a bit further in repairing their image. (Will they? I don't know, history would suggest they won't).

Do you even realize that the box is not even out yet? I understand being upset with the changes they tried to make with DRM and always online. Preorder numbers suggest they are in bad position in relation to competition, but the level of criticism from pre launch twitter questions and rumor seem extraordinary. The system is coming out in 3 weeks. They will need to address questions of real importance post launch when people are actually using the system. If you aren't buying the thing and don't think them leaving the industry would be a negative thing, why the fuck would anyone be breaking their backs to appease your wishes?
 

Nafai1123

Banned
If MS released a half-baked console at launch that is as bad as the rumors are making it sound, they absolutely deserve to be destroyed sales wise. There is no moral high ground dictating that consumers have to put up with bullshit from a company that wants their money. If they fuck up, they deserve to suffer. One would hope it would cause them to work hard to turn things around like Sony did with the PS3.
 

jschreier

Member
OffTopic:

Hey Schreier, I had a beef with you earlier(you probably didn't notice me in all the whubub) during the Kamitani episode where I thought you were THE 14 year old child.
Always believed when one is set to critique another you must start by setting the level of discussion and I found that you set it at a 14 year old boys as you accused Kamitani of doing and even argued that his response was correct by sending, imo, sexy burly dwarves to you. I since not visited Kotaku since I couldn't stomach the majority of the comments.

But I promised one thing, if I ever found out you weren't a 14 year old dillweed I would apologize in the same forum I talked ill of you, so here it is, me saying sorry.

I'm sorry. You aren't a bad bloke. I hope you can take at least this one wrongdoers apology to heart.

Cheers. I made a dumb mistake. I'll most certainly make more dumb mistakes in the future. Live and learn.
 

PaNaMa

Banned
I like a good shitstorm as much as the next guy. Hell, I love one.
So even tho i'm pretty anti Microsoft at this point in my life, and would love to see them fail out of the gate, i just don't see it happening. Enough sources have confirmed there are some serious issues right now, but they still have a full month to deliver a day one patch that makes things stable. *Everything* might not be flawless on day 1 (or even week 1) but I'm sure it will work reasonably well. They are a giant mega corporation with a 10 year business plan for this thing. It will work. If there are problems in house right this second, you can bet *everyone* is dedicated to having it all ironed out by launch. Joke all you want about Microsoft coding, but virtually every PC on the planet runs on their stuff. They have good coders. They will fix whatever OS issues that are being reported.

I'd be more concerned about the system's lack of horsepower. That something they can't really patch.
 

Elios83

Member
All this drama every day is becoming boring, I think at this point we all want the games to speak so that a discussion based on facts can happen.
 
Dumbest thing I have ever heard here. Actually wanting a console to fail. THOUSANDS of jobs at stake, and a product that some people enjoy. Frankly I wouldn't play games any where near as much if Halo wasn't a thing.

If you don't want it don't buy it, but don't wish for it to fail. So stupid.

I bet you desperately wanted Steam to fail too?

Edit: If either Sony or MS were to fail that would leave the other with damn near a monopoly. That is the LAST thing we want.

LIVE was the greatest thing to happen to PSN, it lit a fire under Sony's ass find a way to compete and a improved online infrastructure and PS+ was born

MS failing would be devastating for this industry, it would take years for someone else to fill the void which would allow Sony maintain status quo

Or Nintendo actually competing. (If Iwata gets replaced you never know what happens they have huge cash piles)
 

MIlky1985

Banned
That's a pretty weird take.

They're both trying to make good products that make lots of money.

Thing is I agree with him to a point, I also want Microsoft to have a minor failure with the Xbox one, not fail completely but a couple of years of being quite far behind just to give them a bloody nose. Mainly so the that market as a whole sees that trying to screw over customers in the way they were trying to do is punished by the market and gamers, and that they shouldn't try to bring this stuff back in slowly either.

My fear is that if they do well in a years time you will see loads of people going "see it didn't matter , people can't change anything and actually the ideas they had were good and so we will let them do it this time", if they still do gangbusters well out of the gate they will say that the negative campaign was a flash in a pan and move forward with the terrible ideas, and the publishers will follow (as they kinda wanted them)

Then again I'm a guy who both thinks that ms will try it again and that Sony were planning to do the drm as well before the backlash :p I think its known as being a "Cynical Asshole" as its technical term.
 
I don't want MS to leave the industry but I do want them to take a beating for the the Xbox One's truly awful original vision. They should have known better after seeing our reactions to the many rumors we had about the 'always online' and the used games restrictions. The whole thing is just baffling, and the horrendous PR afterwards made it worse.
 

danwarb

Member
There's a difference between 640p vs. 720p and 720p vs. 1080p. People made a big deal about the resolution and framerate differences then, if they're bigger now why isn't it a big deal?

It's a big deal for those it was a big deal for then. If these games have good AA solutions, the difference here will be less obvious.
 
The last 3 years have been rough. This launch software wise is clearly demonstrating the power of competition. MS clearly sat back and said "Well shit. Our software line up has been a little sparse since '10...Let's fix that.

Where as Sony who over the past 3 years have been lauded for their diverse software lineup have slipped this launch.

This stuff goes in cycles.

You act like MS all but stopped making non-Kinect games for the 360 by accident- they very clearly chose to let the 360 coast by on third party-games and Halo for the last three years while they focused on Kinect and Xbone, whereas Sony continued to invest in PS3 all the way up to the PS4 launch.
 

Viruz

Member
Please all of you stop with the bad news. Please stop, understand that some kids will enjoy their 720p. I hope nobody get hurt. feel.
 

SpartanN92

Banned
Then again I'm a guy who both thinks that ms will try it again and that Sony were planning to do the drm as well before the backlash :p I think its known as being a "Cynical Asshole" as its technical term.

I'm right there with you....I think all companies want it. Nintendo wants it. Sony wants it. MS DESPERATELY wanted it. Sony was smarter...They read the climate and said "Not yet. Maybe next time." MS said "Let's give it a shot....OH SHIT! 180!!!"

Maybe next gen they will try again.
 

Soupstorm

Neo Member
I like a good shitstorm as much as the next guy. Hell, I love one.
So even tho i'm pretty anti Microsoft at this point in my life, and would love to see them fail out of the gate, i just don't see it happening. Enough sources have confirmed there are some serious issues right now, but they still have a full month to deliver a day one patch that makes things stable. *Everything* might not be flawless on day 1 (or even week 1) but I'm sure it will work reasonably well. They are a giant mega corporation with a 10 year business plan for this thing. It will work. If there are problems in house right this second, you can bet *everyone* is dedicated to having it all ironed out by launch. Joke all you want about Microsoft coding, but virtually every PC on the planet runs on their stuff. They have good coders. They will fix whatever OS issues that are being reported.

But at this point they have significantly less than a "full month". It's already long past the 22nd of October, and whatever patch gets delivered on day one will have to be passed through some certification process, even if it's fast tracked.
 

fiyah

Member
Sony has announced 10 games out of 20 due to be released in the first year. Three are there at launch, another two following in the launch window. I don't see what the problem is. What is this obsession with launch? It's not like SCE released 6 games in one month in the past 3 years, and then decided to relax for the remaining 11 months. Releases are naturally spaced out.

This. The only thing missing from Sony's lineup right now is Driveclub. Other than that I think the line up is as you would expect from any company.

Driveclub/Forza = Mass appeal car racing graphics showcase
Killzone/Ryse = Graphics showcase for hardcore fanbase
Knack = family friendly pick up and play platformer
Killer Instinct = nostalgic pickup and play fighter game

I think at the end of the day both consoles have lineups that is well in line with their heritage and none is doing anything different from what they have always done in terms of software. If you've always liked M$ games Titanfall/Ryse is right up your ally...if you've always been into SCEWW then you would love and appreciate the diversity of the games announced Knack, Killzone, Second Son, The Order. Remember M$/Sony can't exactly blow their loads at launch and then have nothing for the next 12 months. They have to stagger releases.
 
In all honesty, I wouldn't be surprised to see both consoles coming out of the gate really hot. They are both promising us the world, but not everything will be there day 1. One look at the "home" pages for 360 and PS3 at launch gets us there.

MS is trying to get a lot of things working well at once that will be incredibly hard to do. Its causing them headaches now, but they are expecting to fix everything as it goes along. I think the real key for both consoles is where they stand heading into the summer. Both consoles should have most of their feature set fleshed out and built.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
The last 3 years have been rough. This launch software wise is clearly demonstrating the power of competition. MS clearly sat back and said "Well shit. Our software line up has been a little sparse since '10...Let's fix that.

Where as Sony who over the past 3 years have been lauded for their diverse software lineup have slipped this launch.

This stuff goes in cycles.


MS have announced 15 games from launch to the end of 2014

Sony have announced around 10 games out of a stated 20 in the same period.

just because we don't know the names doesn't mean they don't exist. Sony may have fewer at launch but will have more by the end of next year and that suits me just fine
 

sajj316

Member
All this news, good or bad, is like a whirlpool in crack laced water .. sucking me into constantly refreshing this thread and GAF!

Well done boys ... well done! The sooner the problems are exposed. The sooner it's fixed!
 
Could you PLEASE remove that Gif. Please. It's giving me brain ceizures... not yet, but i'm expecting them anytime soon now...
\
Thanx for all the work you've done though.

Really? I thought that gif was perfect for a thread summary like this

I could remove it I suppose but then how will I get CW ad revenue? :p

Unless you mean it might actually cause seizures and then I will remove it?
 

HORRORSHØW

Member
Jeremy Conrad ‏@ManaByte 7m
"We won't review a Xbox One until the end of 2014...because by then the OS will work"

I wonder who he's quoting, or if he's pulling it out of his ass.
 
I have just updated my THREAD SUMMARY with some of verendus's newer comments (found at bottom in PS4 section)

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=87786946#post87786946

Specifically





Please let me know if there is more news to be added

I had to grab some sleep :(

Reposted for the scrolling impaired.

Edit: wow this was meant for a request on the previous page but somehow I stuck the landing and got it as the top post on this page. Hopefully this will prevent a few requests for a synopsis of events thus far, but somehow I kinda doubt it.

Still, I give the dismount on this one a 10/10 for perfectly timing the post button amidst the thread's blistering pace.
 

BeauRoger

Unconfirmed Member
No the market will decide how it works. I am saying you don't WANT this to happen. For the sake of jobs and diversity you don't WANT it to happen.

For example: I'm not a fan of the current American government administration. I don't WANT it to fail because of the repercussions but that doesn't mean that voters won't decide that.


All I was saying from the beginning was that hoping for a console (or any product to fail) is stupid. Unless it is directly hurting you in someway there is no reason for you not to live and let live.

All XBO has done in it's current state is make PS4 look better in most regards. They are now forced to go on the offensive to try and win back every customer they lost by creating a more appealing product/game etc...Then Sony will do the same thing again, then Nintendo, then MS ETC.......

Im not talking about the practical consequences of the console failing. I was responding to you taking offense to even the notion of someone wishing something to fail.

Of course the market will always decide, and of course you can discuss his reasons for wishing it to fail, but your initial post wasnt about that, was it? you were criticising the wishing itself and not his reasons. You said that someone shouldnt wish for something to fail because some people might lose their jobs and some people might miss out on a product they like.

Its perfectly possible for him to articulate an argument where it would be in everyones interest for MS to fail with this console to take the industry in a certain direction. You can then attack those arguments, but dont attach the concept of wishing something to go away.
 

Bunta

Fujiwara Tofu Shop
Grimløck;87825196 said:
Jeremy Conrad ‏@ManaByte 7m
"We won't review a Xbox One until the end of 2014...because by then the OS will work"

I wonder who he's quoting, or if he's pulling it out of his ass.

He's been trolling pretty hard.
 

jond76

Banned
Grimløck;87825196 said:
Jeremy Conrad ‏@ManaByte 7m
"We won't review a Xbox One until the end of 2014...because by then the OS will work"

I wonder who he's quoting, or if he's pulling it out of his ass.

He's already proven himself a giant troll, so its probably from his ass.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom