NotTheGuyYouKill
Member
This whole situation and thread is WTF.
They better catch him soon.
They better catch him soon.
It was probably brought up in here already, but as a German I don't know the exact laws but I always assumed it's like this: If you are 18 or above you're not allowed to have sex with anyone under the age of 16.
So this is a really fucked up situation and as far as I'm concerned it's an illegal relationship, as it should be. Even if he would have only started doing it when she was as old as she is now - which he didn't.. Stop defending this goddamnit.
I'm more amazed they get caught (but happy that they are). How difficult is it to book a plane ticket to South-America or Asia and disappear there. Or even just take off to Romania or Turkey. Of course if you head off to Italy, Spain, France or something, you're more likely to get caught. Certainly if you take your own car...I don't understand these couple who go 'on-the-run'... how far do they think they'll actually get?
Can anybody truly go into hiding with the way the world is today?
She could have made that choice voluntarily. However, choice is based to a high degree on experience and information. a 12 year old girl doesn't have much "experience", and the information could have selectively been fed to her by the 48 year old uncle (i.e. him manipulating her)
young minds are much more susceptible for manipulation by adults, which is why these laws exist.
Whenever people say "a 12 year old can't give consent" it's not because a 12 year old can't form coherent thoughts or an opinion, it's because a 12 year old is far too susceptible to manipulation by other people.
Can you imagine the emotions the father/brother in law is going through right now. Holy cow.
Welcome to the 2010sShe's only 14? She looks 18
You guys listing "he's married ! cheating bastard !" as one of the reasons why he has to be stopped make me smile.
Guy runs away with 14old niece and a gun and we question his morality for cheating on his wife.
She's only 14? She looks 18
By that same exact coin, just because it may not be illegal, don't mean it's not completely immoral.I still don't really see the problem. Nobody in this thread knows them personally so I find the insults hard to justify. At least wait for more news before start name-calling.
B. It's also illegal for women to drive in Saudi Arabia so something being illegal alone doesn't really mean much. Please don't reply with "omg did you just compare incest to driving" because that's not the point...
The real issue is that those thoughts and opinions are so heavily influenced by other people as to not meaningfully be referred to as "personal choices."
As an extreme example, sometimes people who are tortured or held in captivity come to appreciate or even love their torturers/captors. Do we believe they "chose" to appreciate or love them? If your idea of "choice" is just "this is what this person believes they want," then they do choose that. I think our understanding of choice can be more nuanced than that, though.
He can choose not to act on his impulses. This is a bullshit argument you are throwing up.But he made the choice to be sexually or romantically attracted to her?
Actually, this line of defense works in italy.
"I didn't know she was only 17 !"
And they left Germany going south..hmmm...
He can choose not to act on his impulses. This is a bullshit argument you are throwing up.
It is a case of:
- even if X wasn't fucked up, Y is
- even if Y wasn't fucked up, Z is
There are comments here, that defending incest or not, are missing the rest of the horrific cake. What sickens me is that there were comments that he should be excused of all the other bullshit BECAUSE incest should be less frowned upon. Like they are oppressed or something.
But he made the choice to be sexually or romantically attracted to her?
He made the choice to act on them.
I'm a hard determinist/materialist, so I'm not the one to ask here. While not everyone agrees with that position, I think most at least agree that "choice" has limits and clearly breaks down at the extremes. Most people agree that fetuses aren't meaningfully "choosing" their fingerprints, nor are people "choosing" to debase themselves if held up at gunpoint.
But yes, if you're asking how far I personally think the rabbit hole goes, I think it goes all the way down. I believe we are all very complicated automatons with some very sophisticated programming, but we are programmed automatons nonetheless. But that reality (or unreality, if I'm wrong) isn't practically applicable on an everyday basis. At least for now, we have to run our society as if free will exists even if it doesn't.
I still think it's weird that 14 is the legal age in some places.
The real issue is that those thoughts and opinions are so heavily influenced by other people as to not meaningfully be referred to as "personal choices."
As an extreme example, sometimes people who are tortured or held in captivity come to appreciate or even love their torturers/captors. Do we believe they "chose" to appreciate or love them? If your idea of "choice" is just "this is what this person believes they want," then they do choose that. I think our understanding of choice can be more nuanced than that, though.
I still think it's weird that 14 is the legal age in some places.
It's actually a bit more complicated than that here in Germany, there's an intricate framework of laws and exceptions taking into account the age of both persons involved and their relation to each other. However, the lowest so-called "Schutzalter" sits at 14 years, and it's a hard border. Sexing anything below that will get you in trouble with the law, no matter what. The next border is 16 years, then 18 years.I still think it's weird that 14 is the legal age in some places.
This whole situation and thread is WTF.
They better catch him soon.
Okay. I understand. And by "run out society as if free will exists even if it doesn't" -- you mean that we have to hold people responsible for the crimes they commit right? Or are you talking about something else?
If I recall correctly in these cases 14 is legal in a sense that both are underage. If a guy is 17 and the girl is 14 then it might be ok. If the other one is 18+ then it's not.
When I look at the guy and the girl I think that she looks older and he is an attractive guy. So my mind starts to think how this happened.
This is wrong and should not have happened and he should have definitely not done anything. The guy is only at fault no matter what. A kid is a kid.
Hard to believe, but the thread is a bit more shocking than the crime.
I looked up the law in Germany and it's actually a bit more complicated than that. In any case, this whole story is rather disturbing and I hope they catch the guy
We're Germans, inventing hugely complex laws that account for everything and anythingI looked up the law in Germany and it's actually a bit more complicated than that.
I still think it's weird that 14 is the legal age in some places.
In any event, I'm surprised at the Gaffers who consent to this.
Morally/Ethically wrong. But is non-blood niece considered incest in Germany under the law?
Seems like the laws he has broken is having sex with a minor, owning a gun & perhaps kidnapping?
What if they live in places where this is legal?