These have to be the charts that they were talking about on the latest Giant Bombcast.
Yes. It's based on the same data as the one in the OP.What multiplatform game was shown at Nintendo's? Are you counting Bayonetta 1?
It's funny because from Nintendo's standpoint, Playstation and xbox have multiplatform exclusivity, thus making them also 100% exclusives?
I'd like to see that too please.It'd be cool to see your data sets used to create these if you have the time OP
Quote the first post.I'd like to see that too please.
Quote the first post.
Thanks but I tried that, it's expired or something.
I imagine that shooter graph is going to get a lot of mileage in certain discussions. Perhaps you can include a breakdown of what it includes with the image to prevent the inevitable "bubububut CONTEXT" trolling that will occur when it's inevitably used?
MS' and Sony's offering will look WAY more impressive when shown in numbers. They showed more games and more gameplay and they have more exclusives than Nintendo.
While percentages work in Nintendo's favor.
-edit
Not always
My take:
So...
1. Nintendo
2. Microsoft
3. Sony
... then?
As a PlayStation guy it kinda hurts, I must say.
My take:
How many of those came from indie game sizzle reels?MS' and Sony's offering will look WAY more impressive when shown in numbers. They showed more games and more gameplay and they have more exclusives than Nintendo.
While percentages work in Nintendo's favor.
-edit
Not always
For reference - the eShop highlight video which wasn't part of the digital event but had equivalents in the Sony and Microsoft conferences shows 29 games.
http://youtu.be/raZ5bTMRjpw
Sure. It would be more interesting to do some analysis based on the showing of each from the whole event rather than just the conferences.And it would appear if they showed it on their event.
The others had also games outside of the conferences
Most interesting thing to me is that MS showed less shooters than Sony. When watching their shows, it did feel as is MS had more of a variety of games (genre) than Sony but didn't know for sure.
Yeah I generally tried to put games where aiming and shooting at things were showcased or core parts of the gameplay. The games you listed I put as "shooting" but I'm not calling them shooters.Not shooters, but games with shooting, OP probably count games like broforce, GTA and MGS as "shooting".
Well the OP has a very strange definition of shooting, so that's probably the most worthless of all the graphs.Not shooters, but games with shooting, OP probably count games like broforce, GTA and MGS as "shooting".
Well the OP has a very strange definition of shooting, so that's probably the most worthless of all the graphs.
Well thanks The point wasn't to be about "here are all the shooter games" but more "here's all the games that are about/related to shooting things" which I feel is a lot more important as far as the industry goes as a whole.
This is the category that is most rife for personal bias, so I stand by the statement that it's worthless the way it's presented now.According to the graphs the following games are all feature shooting:
Fable Legends
Dragon Age Inquisition
Scalebound
Cuphead
Kingdom under Fire
Uncharted 4
While the following games do not feature shooting:
Yoshi's Wooly World (Throwing I guess)
Zelda Wii U uses a bow and arrow fall towards its target
(Hyrule Warriors the same)
Xenoblade X they might have assault rifles but it's in space so that doesn't count
Bloodborne
Way too inconsistently applied. Sometimes projectiles are shooting, other times a gun is shown and that means it showed shooting and other times a gun is shown and it wasn't counted
And I've pointed out your inconsistency in applying that label in a previous post:
This is the category that is most rife for personal bias, so I stand by the statement that it's worthless the way it's presented now.
Luckily we have you as our last line of defense before games like Cuphead destroy our children with the shoot-bang type stuff.I also didn't include any games that were bow/arrow based because I was focusing on guns/bullets/shoot-bang type stuff.
Because there is a lack of transparency on the selection criteria and obvious inconsistencies in what is selected. That is shit?Damn dude why are you so bent out of shape over it?
Luckily we have you as our last line of defense before games like Cuphead destroy our children with the shoot-bang type stuff.
It's not like Mario Maker would ever stoop so low to feature projectiles!
My take:
Wait, what were the 40 games MS announced? Does this include multiplats?
The point wasn't to be about "here are all the shooter games" but more "here's all the games that are about/related to shooting things" which I feel is a lot more important as far as the industry goes as a whole.
It's pretty sad because the vast majority of games are about killing things in one way or another.
What is ridiculous? Those numbers are in my OP, under the graph itself.Jesus, OP, come on. This is ridiculous.
My take:
Wow, awesome work!
But which company had the most female protagonists? :0
Sony:1, Microsoft:1 and Nintendo:2?
Nintendo had a much shorter presentation, a lot of their stuff was shown or announced elsewhere. That makes comparing the events quite difficult. They could have extended the Digital Event by a mere three minutes to show their eShop reel and end up at 40 games as well.Jesus, OP, come on. This is ridiculous.