CassidyIzABeast
Member
They didnt want to announce a game with a cg trailer 3-4 years before they saw release like they did earlier in the generation.sure, and the reason none of them was announced yet..is what exactly?
They didnt want to announce a game with a cg trailer 3-4 years before they saw release like they did earlier in the generation.sure, and the reason none of them was announced yet..is what exactly?
They didnt want to announce a game with a cg trailer 3-4 years before they saw release like they did earlier in the generation.
You really can't win on here.
Before E3, the majority would say that both major platform holders need to stop announcing games so early.
During E3, both platform holders listened and did just that.
After E3, people complain there were no major announcements for no upcoming big AAA titles.
You really can't win on here.
Before E3, the majority would say that both major platform holders need to stop announcing games so early.
During E3, both platform holders listened and did just that.
After E3, people complain there were no major announcements for no upcoming big AAA titles.
EXCLUSIVElaunch console
"Good Lord, what else do you have?"
"Big unannounced Xbox games?"
"Big unannounced Xbox games?"
"Yes."
"May I see them?"
"No."
100GB racing game, 50GB corridor fps, 50GB fighting game.
why not? just look at how people lost their minds over a simple logo (me included). If they want me to buy a xbox they need to ante up their game..and if that means cgi trailers from games in an early development stage..so be it.
You really can't win on here.
Before E3, the majority would say that both major platform holders need to stop announcing games so early.
During E3, both platform holders listened and did just that.
After E3, people complain there were no major announcements for no upcoming big AAA titles.
It's a balance. Look at the general reactions to Ubisoft and Nintendo this year.You really can't win on here.
Before E3, the majority would say that both major platform holders need to stop announcing games so early.
During E3, both platform holders listened and did just that.
After E3, people complain there were no major announcements for no upcoming big AAA titles.
why not? just look at how people lost their minds over a simple logo (me included). If they want me to buy a xbox they need to ante up their game..and if that means cgi trailers from games in an early development stage..so be it.
You really can't win on here.
Before E3, the majority would say that both major platform holders need to stop announcing games so early.
During E3, both platform holders listened and did just that.
After E3, people complain there were no major announcements for no upcoming big AAA titles.
Lemme guess... They're all multiplat.
Surprisingly negative thread when we could be exited about what's to come instead.
I'm not sure what Sony or Microsoft are supposed to do when people complain. Either they are showing games off "too early" and everybody gets mad about waiting or they show off the stuff that's coming soon and people complain about no surprises or bombshells. Pick one. (not you necessarily, but this applies to most people on GAF)
You really can't win on here.
Before E3, the majority would say that both major platform holders need to stop announcing games so early.
During E3, both platform holders listened and did just that.
After E3, people complain there were no major announcements for no upcoming big AAA titles.
This wasn't a majority opinion before E3, or after. Nintendo just won E3 on this forum.You really can't win on here.
Before E3, the majority would say that both major platform holders need to stop announcing games so early.
During E3, both platform holders listened and did just that.
After E3, people complain there were no major announcements for no upcoming big AAA titles.
This wasn't a majority opinion before E3, or after. Nintendo just won E3 on this forum.
why not? just look at how people lost their minds over a simple logo (me included). If they want me to buy a xbox they need to ante up their game..and if that means cgi trailers from games in an early development stage..so be it.
why not? just look at how people lost their minds over a simple logo (me included). If they want me to buy a xbox they need to ante up their game..and if that means cgi trailers from games in an early development stage..so be it.
They did just that with Scalebound and Phantom Dust and it worked out really well for them. They're taking the smarter route this time and I'd must rather hear about a game I'll play in the next 6 or 12 months than get excited for something that went into pre-production 2 months before E3.
This.
People watch E3 to be excited.
Excitement can come from a variety of things. Dream games come true. Ambitious AAA new IPs. Big game announcements with very short announce-release cycle. Amazing trailers/demos.
If you want to have a great conference with the majority of the aspect driven by the excitment of 'short-cycle-announcements', you better have 1-2 big guns ready like AAA new IP announcements or amazing showcases to make up for the fact that you won't have any far-off announcements.
MS didn't have that this year. And if your only game that has a short-announce-release-cycle is Forza and something like Super Luckey's Tale, it will not be enough.
Announced:
1. ReCore
2. Crackdown 3
3. State of Decay 2
4. Killer Instinct ( continuous )
5. Scalebound
6. Phantom Dust HD
7. Ori & the Will of the Wisp
8. Super Luckey's Tale
9. Age of Empires Definitive Edition
Unannounced:
10. Studio Gobo Game
11. Unknown
12. Unknown
13. Unknown
14. Unknown
Speculative:
15+. Unknown quantities of game publishing deals signed between E3 2016-17
Thanks. This is literally all I wanted. More than 4 new games without counting Halo and Gears sounds pretty decent.
Just like how it was all about which console plays the best multi-platforms in 2013 and now its about which console now has the best exclusives.This wasn't a majority opinion before E3, or after. Nintendo just won E3 on this forum.
You must of missed the E3 threads around 14-15 where all the opinions were all along the lines of:Wrong. If E3 is a "show", then how well received a conference is is measured by the impact of the showings.
Holy crap at the amount of salt and shit posting.
Hm? People didn't always find exclusives important?Just like how it was all about which console plays the best multi-platforms in 2013 and now its about which console now has the best exclusives.
Why do you think both companies stopped doing it? Because everyone was complaining about it!
"Exclusives don't sell consoles" - NeoGAF 2013-2016Hm? People didn't always find exclusives important?
Hm? People didn't always find exclusives important?
Why do you think both companies stopped doing it? Because everyone was complaining about it!
Lemme guess... They're all multiplat.
That's still a popular sentiment, because it takes more than that. Are you talking about the mass public or what people on neogaf think for their personal tastes?"Exclusives don't sell consoles" - NeoGAF 2013-2016
There's a big difference between announcing a game that way when it's out in the following year (Metroid Prime 4) and when it's out in only 3-4 years (Scalebound, Crackdown 3).
They did just that with Scalebound and Phantom Dust and it worked out really well for them. They're taking the smarter route this time and I'd much rather hear about a game I'll play in the next 6 or 12 months than get excited for something that went into pre-production 2 months before E3.
I'm happy about the exclusives Xbox is getting this year. SoT, Crackdown 3, Cuphead are titles I'm going to get myself and play the shit out of.How long did it took you to count every complain?
With that relatively strong competition from Sony and Nintendo, exclusive-wise, Microsoft is actually not in a position to be silent about "a lot of big" games being in development right now.
Correct first post.I'll believe it when I see post. it.
More so the popular opinion in GAF.That's still a popular sentiment, because it takes more than that. Are you talking about the mass public or what people on neogaf think for their personal tastes?
I'm happy about the exclusives Xbox is getting this year. SoT, Crackdown 3, Cuphead are titles I'm going to get myself and play the shit out of.
I'm only missing a nice RPG I can stick my teeth into, but Matt shat on that parade for me.
Cue the people who say they're not exclusives.
You really can't win on here.
Before E3, the majority would say that both major platform holders need to stop announcing games so early.
During E3, both platform holders listened and did just that.
After E3, people complain there were no major announcements for no upcoming big AAA titles.
Cue the people who say they're not exclusives.
Oh ffs, now ive annoyed myself.How do I become a timelord like you to get Sea of Thieves this year?
E3 is their biggest stage as long as they don't make moves to change the status quo.
PSX could be bigger for Sony than E3, but they have to go all in if they want that.
TGS is a joke for Sony and will always be a joke, this TGS include. 2015 was a fluke.
The big point is it's a not a bad look if one of them follows up with multiple 6 month reveal to releases, because then we appreciate this E3 more, this will be a hindsight type thing, as there's nothing to suggest there'll be reveals like that, besides Halo 6. Microsoft has to have new games since they're not going to go the second half of the year without new reveals, so they have to have more than just Halo 6.
We have enough info to safely say Sony won't do any 6 months reveal to release games, which puts Microsoft at an advantage.
Nah I refuse to believe that. Check the Forza Horizon 3 Hot Wheels expansion announcement, Freesync unveil on Xbox One X, Xbox Game Pass unveil, Xbox BC unveil, Scorpio paper launch on DF. Genuine excitement from the clear majority.Surprisingly? If it's an Xbox thread with more than 3 pages in a day, it's a negative thread.