Only Target.com... not physical stores.
Is that not what I wrote?
I believe the PS4 and Xbox One deals were in store only at Target
That would explain the relative difference. Still, I'm rather surprised.
Only Target.com... not physical stores.
I believe the PS4 and Xbox One deals were in store only at Target
Ok, so we know it's not a random sample. It may not be completely representative. Where are you going with this? The data says one thing, and though it's not ironclad it seems to be pretty robust. Are you saying that we shouldn't use this for NPD predictions, or...?
Nobody in their right mind would have bought the Battlefront bundle on Black Friday anyway. Only the Uncharted bundle got knocked down to $299. The Star Wars bundle stayed at $350.
I'm saying that interpreting this data is really pretty useless, since we don't actually know the sample size except that it could be anywhere as high as 250000 people (but could also be significantly lower), it isn't representative, and thus it's hard to say. Not to mention since it compares by dollar value, that if you're trying to compute sales it isn't necessarily going to be one-one. And they never make it clear how they handled the sales that gave away a gift card with purchase. Did Xbone sales with a $60 gift card count as $240, or were gift card values ignored?
Apps like this are probably used more by parents than by younger shoppers.
The sample size needed to get a +/- 1% confidence interval at a 95% confidence level for a population of 300 million is 9604. Sample size really isn't an issue here.
How would you know this? You're just throwing things at the wall.
Did Xbone sales with a $60 gift card count as $240, or were gift card values ignored?
They would have to take two different items on a receipt and cancel them both out...why would they do that?
DAT 90%
Because the deal was directly related, and shoppers probably took such things into account. Plus it means the amount of money the console brought in was effectively less, since the two were intrinsically linked by the deal
I don't. But one thing you learn in statistics is that you should never just assume a sample is representative just because you can't think of a reason it shouldn't be. There's a very good reason people stress taking random samples. And there is literally nothing random about this
I don't think it matters that much. We're not deducting $60 for every Uncharted bundle. It's basically the same thing as a bundled game.
The only way the results would be skewed is if there were a very clear correlation between consumers likely to use the apps and preference for one console. It's broken down by percentages. I'm not sure what agenda you have, but you sure seem to have one in repeating yourself over and over.
MS probably lost the month but still did extremely well. I think they could win Dec. if MS sticks to $299 and PS4 goes back up.
I don't really care personally, I just think it's unreasonable to assume this is accurate for the larger population. But I don't have data for the app's demographics, nor do I know if this even accurately represents them since the data was taken by first responders (starting on Thanksgiving as well, so things with sales that started then would also likely be overestimated compared to things where the best sales started on black friday)
I mean, if you're trying to determine the amount of money it brought to the store, it's totally relevant.
And if you're not, then why measure share in $ and not units sold?
MS probably lost the month but still did extremely well. I think they could win Dec. if MS sticks to $299 and PS4 goes back up.
MS probably lost the month but still did extremely well. I think they could win Dec. if MS sticks to $299 and PS4 goes back up.
no idea what you are talking about.So you think an extra day will out do three weeks of pre-BF woop ass?
The price for this went up today
The highest it's been in weeks
really hope this is a random pic, but I'm guessing you a hardcore fanboy who is juicing on whatever you think you are reading,
People doubted the InfoScout numbers last year and we all know how that turned out.
wrong thread?
lolol
WTF does my name has anything to do with with the topic?
For everyone crapping on their sample size, here is their estimate from last year. I'd say it was pretty on point.
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=942019&page=1
WTF does my name has anything to do with with the topic?
Wasn't Microsoft giving out $60 gift cards with all their bundles?
One of the games I've played the most this generation, don't knock it, it's worth every sale, it's cheap, awesome and plays great on both consoles at 1080p locked 60fps with great controls. I'm playing it with my daughter, building stuff and exploring during the relatively safe daytime with her and going below to mine and kill stuff at the nights by myself. Fantastic game.Minecraft, man....
For everyone crapping on their sample size, here is their estimate from last year. I'd say it was pretty on point.
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=942019&page=1
It's interesting that Battlefront is looking like it might actually disappoint.
Obviously it's still gonna sell millions but most figured it would be huge, huge.
Disappointed that Rise of the Tomb Raider couldn't crack the top twenty especially when it's far better than the majority of those games. UGH. Poor Crystal Dynamics. They develop one hell of a game that surpasses the 2013 reboot in every way but get sent out to die by Microsoft. *SMH* :'(
I just hope the total units isn't a huge YoY drop. All this BF decline talk has me a bit unsure,even though video games are a drop in a bucket in the overall scheme of things.
I think the assumptions are based on history more than using just this info as a single data point. There hasn't been any data brought forth to discredit the site's predictions to my knowledge. Last time there were a ton of people hugely skeptical, then NPD proved the data somewhat reliable,if not 100% accurate. I'm more interested in YoY performance myself for total HW and SW.