I just....what?!True, but I want to know, who shot first.
Unless she was directly threatening the child which hopefully she wasn't, the police should have never fired the first shot.
I just....what?!
It says right in the article that she pointed a gun at police multiple times. You point a gun at a cop, they pull the trigger.
Feel bad for the kid. The mom who did that to him, not so much. Terrible. Police gave her every chance.
I just....what?!
It says right in the article that she pointed a gun at police multiple times. You point a gun at a cop, they pull the trigger.
That is literally what is taught in the academy.
Also, that thread title. Jeez.
What thread title would you have used?
Police shoot and kill armed woman using own child as a shield, Child also shot.
?
Huh? You got proof of that for I must have missed it if true?
Beats me. In the video, she can be heard asking the kid what the police were doing there, to which he replied, "They're trying to kill us." Let's say the cops were there with the intent to murder her family why wouldn't you send your child to safety in some way? You don't carry them while pointing a gun at the cops. I wish this situation had never occurred, but she endangered the life of her child. She's clearly aware that the police are trigger-happy, so what does she do? Put her son in a situation where the police are most likely to shoot.
It's also pathetic how so many accept that "pointing a gun at a cop" equals a death sentence.
When are police not "locked and loaded"? I'm betting there less officers at the beginning of the event, but later after they discovered that she was armed and using her son as a human shield that they would call for back up.
Is there any contradictory reports out yet?
According to her friends, apparently she posted a lot about Police abuse in the city on Facebook. So some are factoring that into the incident.
Sounds tragic all around and obviously if she fires the police are left little option. It's a pity the offices couldn't disengage entirely and drop the situation to a negotiation without risk of being shot but perhaps that wasn't possible
Amazing how so many in the thread simply believe the narrative by the police.
As if police narrative hasn't been contradicted once videos come out.
No video? Don't buy it.
It's also pathetic how so many accept that "pointing a gun at a cop" equals a death sentence.
In how many videos, even when armed, have black people shot by police pointed the gun huh?
The Bundy ranch people pointed guns at cops for days and didn't get shot. Black woman holding a baby? Both get shot. Difficult situation, but if the baby also got shot, this wasn't about protecting the baby either.
Black lives DON'T matter
I'm not going to comment on the rest of what you said because, like in every case, we weren't there and have no idea what the details of what happened were.
But
Pointing a gun at a cop in a situation such as this will get you killed no matter what you are. If you're a bunny rabbit you'll get shot.
They can not do that in this situation. Once the weapon was drawn and the child taken, you forced their hand and for good reason. You can't have them running off and possibly having them shoot at other people or deciding to murder/Suicide with the kid. That's standard procedure across the globe.
Does the "let's wait for all the facts 1st" crew only show up when the individual is white?
It's also pathetic how so many accept that "pointing a gun at a cop" equals a death sentence.
What? Several people have posted that they were waiting for more evidence before forming an opinion. If anything the opposite is true here. There are no posters insinuating that the people waiting for more facts in this case are closet racists.
I mean, it's easily in the top 5 of the dumbest things anyone can do right now on planet earth.
No. What you see is the opposite. People accepting the police narrative without question.
The result in practice is not standard procedure across the globe. Clearly, the safety of the child was not the focus of police here...
In the very same post I gave an example when this didn't happen.
The fact that our standard for state sanctioned violence is so low doesn't mean it's remotely acceptable.
Scenarios like this make it clear what the purpose of the police is. It's enforcement not safety. What was the initial goal of the police here? Arrest. What was the result? Death. The police would rather murder you and shoot your child than wait longer.
Black lives DONT matter.
The result in practice is not standard procedure across the globe. Clearly, the safety of the child was not the focus of police here...
Yes, please leave a child alone with a mother using him as a shield while brandishing a gun. Or since you're saying surrounding an armed assailant isn't standard procedure to contain the situation to prevent it from spilling into a more public area.
Clearly, that isn't standard procedure.
.........
And straight up, I don't think it would have ended this way with a white mother and child.
Does the "let's wait for all the facts 1st" crew only show up when the individual is white?
A tragic situation, one where if you just look at the facts as presented you can't really blame the officers involved for the ending.
Thinking about the context of the situation though, the warrants for her arrest, and some of the things my friends have gone through when it comes to the criminal justice system... the way the police and courts target poor and black people with petty fines and hard to meet scheduling requirements and disproportionate bail fees...
It's easy to see a situation where a young mother, whose life had spun out of control because of a few traffic incidents, felt she had no other choice.
She essentially died because of crimes that, individually, would have been easy for someone like me to take care of. I get paid time off to go plead not-guilty at the local magistrate court. A deposit on my plea is no big deal since I am paid well. I can show up to my court date with little worry over losing my job or losing much needed money.
I'm sure that this situation could have been easily avoided if the court and criminal justice system weren't tuned specifically to fuck over people like her.
Instead, she was put in a seemingly (to her) intractable situation. And the cops were forced into that situation as well.
RIP
We need criminal justice reform in this country ASAP.
Not a single doubt in my mind.
A tragic situation, one where if you just look at the facts as presented you can't really blame the officers involved for the ending.
Thinking about the context of the situation though, the warrants for her arrest, and some of the things my friends have gone through when it comes to the criminal justice system... the way the police and courts target poor and black people with petty fines and hard to meet scheduling requirements and disproportionate bail fees...
It's easy to see a situation where a young mother, whose life had spun out of control because of a few traffic incidents, felt she had no other choice.
She essentially died because of crimes that, individually, would have been easy for someone like me to take care of. I get paid time off to go plead not-guilty at the local magistrate court. A deposit on my plea is no big deal since I am paid well. I can show up to my court date with little worry over losing my job or losing much needed money.
I'm sure that this situation could have been easily avoided if the court and criminal justice system weren't tuned specifically to fuck over people like her.
Instead, she was put in a seemingly (to her) intractable situation. And the cops were forced into that situation as well.
RIP
We need criminal justice reform in this country ASAP.
Not a single doubt in my mind.
not sure what her being black has to do with this one.
I've read stories about police driving tank-like vehicles into the wrong house then shooting everyone inside all because someone reported that they "may" have some weed.
One, I doubt you have a clue about "standard procedure" around the globe.They can not do that in this situation. Once the weapon was drawn and the child taken, you forced their hand and for good reason. You can't have them running off and possibly having them shoot at other people or deciding to murder/Suicide with the kid. That's standard procedure across the globe.
I don't know about physically using him as a shield, but she had hours to release him so he could be taken somewhere safe, and instead chose to keep him there with her.
The reporting moves quickly through the part about the police shooting first during a standoff. There's unanswered questions from that, first and foremost being "why exactly did they shoot first?"
One, I doubt you have a clue about "standard procedure" around the globe.
Two, I'm not talking about them running away. I'm talking about backing away and entering negotiation with trained negotiators. There seems no indication she would hurt the child and such a process would likely have reduced chances of him being hurt.
Ultimately what would be best would be a situation where she wasn't armed.
She didn't out down the gun so they shot her, but I suppose most of you in this thread would be happier to read mother shoots son in head and then gets shot by police.
A tragic situation, one where if you just look at the facts as presented you can't really blame the officers involved for the ending.
Thinking about the context of the situation though, the warrants for her arrest, and some of the things my friends have gone through when it comes to the criminal justice system... the way the police and courts target poor and black people with petty fines and hard to meet scheduling requirements and disproportionate bail fees...
It's easy to see a situation where a young mother, whose life had spun out of control because of a few traffic incidents, felt she had no other choice.
During a six hour negotiation. At some point someone decided that the posturing through six hours switched from just that to legitimate threat to life evidenced in opening fire. I'd like to know why.Because (they claim) she pointed her gun at them.