Future PhaZe
Member
Super curious to see how this sells compared to gits. I might argue that gits had a better trailer and comparable star power. So how much the off camera talent difference and lack of controversy affect sales? Super interesting.
Well, he doesn't have Lubezki to go up against this time.If this movie is good, Deakins is a shoe in for cinematography.
Finally.
If this movie is good, Deakins is a shoe in for cinematography.
Finally.
Super curious to see how this sells compared to gits. I might argue that gits had a better trailer and comparable star power. So how much the off camera talent difference and lack of controversy affect sales? Super interesting.
That looks decent. Never seen the original Bladerunner though.
I think it'll do better but not that much better. For whatever reason I think America has something against cyberpunk in general. I would love to be proven wrong.Super curious to see how this sells compared to gits. I might argue that gits had a better trailer and comparable star power. So how much the off camera talent difference and lack of controversy affect sales? Super interesting.
Here's two png captures I made from prores version of the trailer (it's still 1080p footage, which means that the movie is likely not being mastered in 4K). Looks nice and uncompressed, good wallpaper material.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/Va8Oa87.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/9H7hCkm.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/cy8giQf.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/NSRvetk.png[/IMG]
The visuals certainly look really good, but something feels a little off to me. I'm not sure how to put it, but it's like the movie looks a bit too clean (if that makes any sense). It put me off the most, when Gosling's character entered the casino(?). It didn't look abandoned at all and not dirty either, considering the environment outside. Really weird. It doesn't really evoke a noir feeling for me.
And Robin Wright's character said the world is built on a wall. I don't know if that's literal or metaphorical or both. Could be saying the wall that divides humans and replicants is the ability to procreate. "There is an order to things. That's what we do here, keep order." I think that line blurring between replicant and human is what'll plunge society into chaos. Everyone freaking out and being paranoid over who is a replicant and human when there is little to no distinction.
Nice, made a gallery with more pictures.
http://imgur.com/gallery/2yVkM
Code:[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/Va8Oa87.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/9H7hCkm.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/cy8giQf.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/NSRvetk.png[/IMG]
Super curious to see how this sells compared to gits. I might argue that gits had a better trailer and comparable star power. So how much the off camera talent difference and lack of controversy affect sales? Super interesting.
Some of you are too obsessed with the "grimy, grungy" aesthetic​ of the first movie. In universe this takes place 30 years later so expecting technology to have remained constant is beyond absurd
The visuals certainly look really good, but something feels a little off to me. I'm not sure how to put it, but it's like the movie looks a bit too clean (if that makes any sense). It put me off the most, when Gosling's character entered the casino(?). It didn't look abandoned at all and not dirty either, considering the environment outside. Really weird. It doesn't really evoke a noir feeling for me.
[IMG]http://images4.static-bluray.com/reviews/217_4_1080p.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://images2.static-bluray.com/reviews/217_6_1080p.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://images3.static-bluray.com/reviews/217_10_1080p.jpg[/IMG]
Haven't seen those myself, so didn't feel good about recommending those. Definitely been on my personal list to check out for some time though.
I love Scarlet, but I cannot remember the last movie with her as the primary lead (aka, not Marvel) that didn't bomb horribly.
I love Scarlet, but I cannot remember the last movie with her as the primary lead (aka, not Marvel) that didn't bomb horribly.
Read the book, watch the theatrical cut, watch the director's cut, then the final cut. After that your good to go.
I wonder if it's less about plunging society into chaos and more about humanity forcing itself to face and answer the question "Why don't we just let the replicants take over? It's not like we're good for this place."
Because I'm also wondering if the cities look a little cleaner because Replicants are populating the cities now, working in them, cleaning them up. The wastelands fall into deeper disrepair - that's where the grunge is going as the robots make the world livable again.
It'd be an interesting notion to pursue: What if our creations evolved to be better and more worthy of survival than we are?
I hope the wastelands are a callback to the nuclear wastelands from the book.
Maybe it's also because they're shooting digitally? Barely a speck of film grain.
It really does look very different from the original. I guess we're just gonna have to deal. It looks great in its own right.
Blade Runner is well known in America. No one has ever heard of GiTS.Super curious to see how this sells compared to gits. I might argue that gits had a better trailer and comparable star power. So how much the off camera talent difference and lack of controversy affect sales? Super interesting.
Then watch the making of "Dangerous Days", wich is one of the best.
(and kinda shows that Ridley Scott only makes good movies when the production is a trainwreck)
Villeneuve, Gosling, Fancher, Deakins, Ford....how the hell can this movie go wrong?
Is that the cuban actress from Knock Knock? Big fan
I think 2049 looks more detached. Similar aesthetics but a different take.Maybe it's also because they're shooting digitally? Barely a speck of film grain.
It really does look very different from the original. I guess we're just gonna have to deal. It looks great in its own right.
Casino scene felt a little weak, yeah. Movie won't look as grungy as the original, but I think it looks great.The visuals certainly look really good, but something feels a little off to me. I'm not sure how to put it, but it's like the movie looks a bit too clean (if that makes any sense). It put me off the most, when Gosling's character entered the casino(?). It didn't look abandoned at all and not dirty either, considering the environment outside. Really weird. It doesn't really evoke a noir feeling for me.