The teens' killings stirred debate around the state and in Little Falls a Mississippi River city of 8,000 about 100 miles northwest of Minneapolis about how far a homeowner can go in responding to a threat.
For the uninformed, who is Byron Smith?
Audio is horrific, dude's a psycho.
For the uninformed, who is Byron Smith?
Thank god, fucking sociopath.
Thank god, fucking sociopath.
I agree we should definitely check up on veterans more often. In saying that, I'm really disappointed in the way the VA treats us veterans. Every time I went to a VA clinic, I always felt like my very presence was a nuisance to the staff there. Because of that, I disenrolled from the VA health care system and got private insurance.
Regarding the case, it should've been clear cut to most people that what this guy did was premeditated murder, but you'll always have diehards spouting 'breaking into a person's home = loss of human rights.'
I work with people who love guns and always talk about blowing away burglars and such.
Guarantee if this is on the breakroom tv tomorrow I'll hear "this country's really fucked up now - man cant even defend his own house anymore".
It's unfortunate that he was pushed to his limits and frustrated by the ineffectiveness of the police in the years leading up to the murders. It doesn't excuse his actions in any way but this man is clearly mentally unstable considering he crafted this elaborate ruse to carry out his own twisted, murderous version of justice. He should have gotten help before any of this turned into a problem but now he's basically thrown his life away and taken the lives of two teenagers who deserve to be behind bars instead of in coffins.
"I am not a bleeding heart liberal. I felt like I was cleaning up a mess."
Is he talking to himself the entire time?
It starts with what I am assuming is his call to the neighbor to come on by the next day. It is the next day when a neighbor reports the killings. Then he calls a lawyers office saying he is going to need to come in.
All clearly showing premeditation
No it doesn't perfectly describe the event, that's why the justice system doesn't consider it a valid terminology. There are already statutes covering the crimes which may occur during a "home invasion", and they vary wildly in terms of sentencing because they are not all violent or dangerous.
I don't think that's taking it too far as that's exactly how I feel. The death penalty should be reserved for clear cut cases like this so we can cull our population of cancerous people like this guy. His existence no longer serves any purpose in society and he is of no good use to anyone. Put him down cheaply and humanely and lets all move on without him.
This thread is probably going to fill up with people defending and having sympathy for the criminals just like the other one. And just like this jury.
Also casting aspersions on the hero for waiting when he just wanted to spare the police from having their holidays ruined.
This thread is probably going to fill up with people defending and having sympathy for the criminals just like the other one. And just like this jury.
Also casting aspersions on the hero for waiting when he just wanted to spare the police from having their holidays ruined.
Eh?This thread is probably going to fill up with people defending and having sympathy for the criminals just like the other one. And just like this jury.
Also casting aspersions on the hero for waiting when he just wanted to spare the police from having their holidays ruined.
I think we're arguing semantics. I'm not speaking in a legal or justice system sense, I'm speaking in a colloquial or poetic sense. You're home is literally being invaded by other people. Hence, from that angle I think it is a perfect description of what is occuring.
This thread is probably going to fill up with people defending and having sympathy for the criminals just like the other one. And just like this jury.
Also casting aspersions on the hero for waiting when he just wanted to spare the police from having their holidays ruined.
Trolling?
I work with people who love guns and always talk about blowing away burglars and such.
Guarantee if this is on the breakroom tv tomorrow I'll hear "this country's really fucked up now - man cant even defend his own house anymore".
This thread is probably going to fill up with people defending and having sympathy for the criminals just like the other one. And just like this jury.
Also casting aspersions on the hero for waiting when he just wanted to spare the police from having their holidays ruined.
You know, I'm glad he's in jail and all, but I don't really feel bad for the criminals. No one "wins" here, just an awful situation brought about by awful people clashing head to head.
You know, I'm glad he's in jail and all, but I don't really feel bad for the criminals. No one "wins" here, just an awful situation brought about by awful people clashing head to head.
There is no material possession worth someone's life. I think the fact that they only came in because they thought he was gone would demonstrate they were interested in stealing, not attacking the owner.
I'm not excusing their robbery, but I can't take the logical step of "they wanted to take a TV without paying for one, therefore they deserved to die".
This is the problem with the death penalty. When you have one, people with guns start to think it's okay to mete it out on their own as a valid punishment.