Bingo.
The people who paid money for this shit are actively making the video games industry worse.
Sony were probably able to boost the CPU but not as high as the XB1 CPU if it still doesn't match it as DF state.
On my PC, which actually has a decent, midrange (although 5 years old) CPU, 2500K@4ghz, I never ever drop below 30fps, and that is in 1080p and mixture of high/ultra.
I really hate that if you aren't sitting here bashing Ubisoft to hell, you're an 'apologist'. All he said was that this has basically brought Unity in line with *most* other AC titles, which probably isn't completely untrue, although this one is probably one of the worst performing ones still.So lets give the garbage performance a pass because the visuals are nice?
We shouldn't be happy that a current-gen game is in-line with last-gen games in terms of performance just because it looks better. For fucks sake...the game dips into the low teens and has terrible pop-in after four patches. What the fuck? I don't care how good the graphics are, it's no excuse and just sounds like Ubisoft-apologist bullshit.
I don't remember ever hearing anybody call the XB1 CPU 'vastly superior'.Wow, where did those 3 extra frames per second came from? I thought the PS4 CPU couldn't do more compared to the vastly superior XB1 CPU...
/s
Wow, where did those 3 extra frames per second came from? I thought the PS4 CPU couldn't do more compared to the vastly superior XB1 CPU...
/s
Seriously, a guess? Both version enjoyed some optimization in the assets, with the PS4 also netting results from the alignment of its codebase with the X1'sWow, where did those 3 extra frames per second came from? I thought the PS4 CPU couldn't do more compared to the vastly superior XB1 CPU...
/s
I really hate that if you aren't sitting here bashing Ubisoft to hell, you're an 'apologist'. which probably isn't completely untrue, although this one is probably one of the worst performing ones still.
All he said was that this has basically brought Unity in line with *most* other AC titles
There's no need, their online stuff already works so poorly that you wouldn't notice a difference.It's a miracle Ubisoft hasnt got hacked or ddos'd to death with all of this happening.
So lets give the garbage performance a pass because the visuals are nice?
We shouldn't be happy that a current-gen game is in-line with last-gen games in terms of performance just because it looks better. For fucks sake...the game dips into the low teens and has terrible pop-in after four patches. What the fuck? I don't care how good the graphics are, it's no excuse and just sounds like Ubisoft-apologist bullshit.
I don't remember ever hearing anybody call the XB1 CPU 'vastly superior'.
Well, looking at the game, and seeing how much more it's doing than any other game I've played on this generation (both visually and in terms of scale), I personally can understand why the performance is patchy. Perhaps you would have preferred that they scale the game down and made cutbacks until it was closer to ACII in scope and scale, and then maybe they might have been able to push the graphics at 30fps.
Lets not pretend that. The original analysis thread is a goldmine, for exampleI don't remember ever hearing anybody call the XB1 CPU 'vastly superior'.
Absolutely Spot On!
There's a huge difference in CPU's between the consoles so obviously the X1 version would be better even though the PS4 GPU is superior and the GDDR5 RAM is better suited for games!
Lets not pretend that. The original analysis thread is a goldmine, for example
Playing a PC game at 30fps you're living the dream mate.
I would have preferred them to do anything that is necessary to make the game run well. Scale and visual flare mean fuck all to me if the performance is "patchy" (lol), and if a dev puts those things above performance, then those devs don't get my money. It's as simple as that.
And I understand perfectly why it performs like it does. Still no excuse, though.
So it sounds like it's still not worth buying. 50% GPU advantage yet the game looks the same as Xbox. You've lost me as a customer Ubisoft for a garbage quality product.
CPU usage is different from PC to consoles. It doesn't work like this. I'm pretty sure we've talked about this before.
Entirely possible that clock speed increases on consoles would translate to more performance(than on PC) due to not being draw call limited.
What a disgusting product, how can people even play this game in its current state? I dont mind some graphical issues with framerate but this is unacceptable from a developer that has hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue and 800+ employees. But! They did give a free game for those with the season pass, so its not completely bad.
Then don't give them money, I don't really care. I personally would rather take the improvements to the city, visuals, and NPC count than yet another cross-gen game.
What on earth leads you to believe that the end result of certain cut-backs would be a game that resembles a cross-gen game?
Because virtually every other game I've played so far this generation is either a cross-gen game or could have been one.
Because virtually every other game I've played so far this generation is either a cross-gen game or could have been one.
Your logic here is as spotty as the performance of ACU. Way to ignore everything else about Lucas' post that made your followup unnecessary and disingenuous.
I'm just fed up of being called a corporate apologist shitlord over framerates.
I'm just fed up of being called a corporate apologist shitlord over framerates.
The only problems I have had even before the patches were a few framerate hitches here and there, but the game has still been entirely great for me. In fact, I have ran into more bugs in general while playing Dragon Age: Inquisition. Just thought I would toss that out there.
Of course, with a more powerful hardware how you can't ? But it's not my point. Blame the console hardware when this game it's a buggy mess until four patches,seems really unfair, considering it struggle even in a monster rig.I am getting more than twice what the PS4 gets, at much better graphics and higher resolution. Good enough for me.
I have too. I'll take occasional teen framerates over corrupted saves and freezing any day.
I have too. I'll take occasional teen framerates over corrupted saves and freezing any day.
I love Inquisition, but I had to restart the game several times due to freezing during dialogue, it is loaded with messy clipping during cutscenes, animations freeze and leave my character floating around... The works. I have experienced nothing like this in Unity. Only the aforementioned frame drops every now and then, which have hardly been game breaking. It's up there with Black Flag and AC II as my favorites of the series.