It's not about simply not liking the actress or her portrayal though.. "she's too skinny" and "she doesn't look the part" are weird criticisms that seem to be based upon almost nothing but "she doesn't look as hot/busty as the original"
lol, I knew you were hoping someone would say something like that so you could jump on them.
I've enjoyed Vikander's performances in the couple of movies I've seen her and she's plenty hot. Doesn't change the fact that she's not a good fit for the character.
You're getting super hyped, dude.
Movie looks like it will be terrible. Definitely watching.
recycle bin.Looks like straight to
It's not about simply not liking the actress or her portrayal though.. "she's too skinny" and "she doesn't look the part" are weird criticisms that seem to be based upon almost nothing but "she doesn't look as hot/busty as the original"
That's not ALWAYS the case, but I don't understand why skinny or thin is "not looking the part" when the character from the game looks very similar to that description.
People seem to have very specific criteria for "when the glove fits"
I'm not "hoping" for anything.
I'm not "hoping" for anything. A lot of comments from both threads seem to stem from that perspective without actually admitting it though. There was even one dude from the other thread who straight up admitted it.
That's not a "fact", lol.
I'm not sure what this even means
Nah, it's pretty obvious what you were fishing for in this thread.
You seem personally upset that people have different opinions, and have asked like 800 questions on "WHY! WHY! WHY!" in the past couple of pages.
Vikander is fine she's young, fit, has a British accent and acting chops, I can't really think of many more fitting actresses in the business right now. That said, most people will be comparing her to the digital version of the character which is obviously idealized so discrepancies will arise.
Anyway, I'd be much more concerned about the footage itself... that last segment was terribad and that slow-mo face was just...nope. What are they even trying to convey? Is she terrified she almost died or is it an "I can't believe I'm so awesome all of a sudden" moment? Anyways I didn't like TR 2013 for its aesthetics or plot whatsoever and this pretty much seems like and adaptation of that so unless this gets rave reviews and moviegoers seem to like itthink I'll pass.
Its cropped so that you can't see much of anything, and being a prop weapon the draw weight is probably next to nothing, but what exactly is wrong with this?
Doesn't scream Tomb Raider
Looks about as interesting as the Assassins Creed movie... was that out already? (not that I'd be interested in watching these)
To go from Ex Machina to this.
Taking this from the OT thread.
The way her legs flail a hundred miles an hour... this is going to be a gem.
To go from Ex Machina to this.
Will reserve judgment until the trailer hits, but gotta admit, am getting Inhumans vibes on whats been teased so far.
Lawrence's draw technique actually looks noticeably bad there. Her elbow is jutting out at an angle, when it should be pulled straight back perpedicular to the bow.So, much of bow-and-arrow work on a movie set now is CG (no matter how soft the rubber tips, it's dangerous firing off projectiles, and you don't want to dry-fire a bow... plus most movies now concentrate on action looking awesome rather than realistic,) and so scrutiny of "realism" isn't always fair. Hawkeye and Legolas look cool firing off arrows, but of course they don't hold up if you look too close. But this is a close-up shot, this is a scene that is only about shooting a bow (or threatening somebody with a bow,) and this bow is central to the character of Lara, so I think it's fair to look at it as indicative of larger issues of how much attention is being paid to Tomb Raider's producers "getting it right".
Compare to Hunger Games:
Lawrence has a good grip on the bow string itself instead of on the arrow (with one finger above the nocked arrow, one or two below,) she's not relying on her thumb and forefinger to pinch the arrow and hold the whole weight of the bow (I'm no bow expert and maybe some people do still grab by the arrow... though if the bow were strung powerful enough to kill, I feel like a 'light touch' is a bad call.) She uses natural elements of her physique to pull (Vikander is being asked to do a "movie bow" stunt where the bow and arrow are always in the camera's eye, but usually if you're pulling a heavy bow, you'd start with it down rather than out because your muscles work better that way pulling across the body.) She has control over the bow and pulls it back smoothly, but you can also see how she handles it as she hits some stress points or tension as it bends back. You only need to be steady and ice-cold when you're actually about to loose your weapon, so if you struggle, just gain it back and lock in by the time you're ready to fire, which she is doing as the GIF comes to an end. She pulls back the complete reach of the bow for full power. And she has her eye on the target the whole time but her aiming is based on the arrow, not her head's line of sight.
I mean, I'm kind of making up terms (I've not shot a bow competitively since I was in scouts,) but "prop weapon" or not, I absolutely believe every aspect of this motion in Hunger Games. Plus, she looks bad-ass and menacing doing it. Win-win for reality.
To go from Ex Machina to this.
What in the world is up with her proportions
Daisy Ridley knew what she was doing dodging this one
What in the world is up with her proportions
Daisy Ridley knew what she was doing dodging this one
Second the Lauren Cohan notion.
So, much of bow-and-arrow work on a movie set now is CG (no matter how soft the rubber tips, it's dangerous firing off projectiles, and you don't want to dry-fire a bow... plus most movies now concentrate on action looking awesome rather than realistic,) and so scrutiny of "realism" isn't always fair. Hawkeye and Legolas look cool firing off arrows, but of course they don't hold up if you look too close. But this is a close-up shot, this is a scene that is only about shooting a bow (or threatening somebody with a bow,) and this bow is central to the character of Lara, so I think it's fair to look at it as indicative of larger issues of how much attention is being paid to Tomb Raider's producers "getting it right".
Compare to Hunger Games:
Lawrence has a good grip on the bow string itself instead of on the arrow (with one finger above the nocked arrow, one or two below,) she's not relying on her thumb and forefinger to pinch the arrow and hold the whole weight of the bow (I'm no bow expert and maybe some people do still grab by the arrow... though if the bow were strung powerful enough to kill, I feel like a 'light touch' is a bad call.) She uses natural elements of her physique to pull (Vikander is being asked to do a "movie bow" stunt where the bow and arrow are always in the camera's eye, but usually if you're pulling a heavy bow, you'd start with it down rather than out because your muscles work better that way pulling across the body.) She has control over the bow and pulls it back smoothly, but you can also see how she handles it as she hits some stress points or tension as it bends back. You only need to be steady and ice-cold when you're actually about to loose your weapon, so if you struggle, just gain it back and lock in by the time you're ready to fire, which she is doing as the GIF comes to an end. She pulls back the complete reach of the bow for full power. And she has her eye on the target the whole time but her aiming is based on the arrow, not her head's line of sight.
I mean, I'm kind of making up terms (I've not shot a bow competitively since I was in scouts,) but "prop weapon" or not, I absolutely believe every aspect of this motion in Hunger Games. Plus, she looks bad-ass and menacing doing it. Win-win for reality.
"I've got a bad feeling about this"
The only prerequisite is young and female. That's it. This isn't the 90's-aimed-at-horny-teen-boys Lara Croft. It hasn't been that way for a long time my friend.
It's amazing how much reducing a characters cup size can buy you in some people's mind.
It's still a super model running around in the woods but since she has an average bust she's not meant to appeal to young males? Sure.
The prerequisite is young, female and attractive. You missed one.
other gaf thread was telling me that she's not attractive tho
Vikander was in a movie specifically playing a character literally built to appeal to a young male. Knuckleheaded gaffers don't matter.
Lawrence's draw technique actually looks noticeably bad there. Her elbow is jutting out at an angle, when it should be pulled straight back perpedicular to the bow ... In that gif we don't actually see Vikander finish the draw, so it's hard to make an one to one comparison.
The gif seems to cut be she reaches her full draw so maybe the whole clip is better. I will concede that Vikander's pull look crazy light. .
The only prerequisite is young and female. That's it. This isn't the 90's-aimed-at-horny-teen-boys Lara Croft. It hasn't been that way for a long time my friend.
It literally has TOMB RAIDER written all over it.