• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

#GamerGate thread 2: it's about feminism in games journalism

Status
Not open for further replies.

vcc

Member
I was responding to a previous post with what the post seemed to be referencing. I deliberately used the word "appears" when talking about the post in case it was not legitimate.

hmm... classic #GG.

  • Present wild accusation as fact.
  • Evidence/Analysis comes out that it's mostly or completely not true.
  • Backpedal and claim you were only presenting possible evidence
  • repeat
 

Mesoian

Member

I love the response to this.

"WHOA WHOA WHOA?!? Why are you upset? It couldn't be the headline that says that you support doxxing and hate speech is it? We AGREE on SO MUCH but one thing makes you go off on us on Twitter?!?"

Thank god for the internet, because without, these people would be laughed out of every television production house in the northern hemisphere.
 
hmm... classic #GG.

  • Present wild accusation as fact.
  • Evidence/Analysis comes out that it's mostly or completely not true.
  • Backpedal and claim you were only presenting possible evidence
  • repeat

It's a classic conspiracy nutjob tactic.

"I'm just asking questions, here!"
 
From what I understand, Arthur once said that anyone who posts on a "RAT forum" needs to be doxxed.

RAT forums for those not in the know, are data theft/blackmailing websites.

(The reason David asks about extremely specific tweets like this is, of course, because he directly loads his interview questions from GG's input.)
 

Archurro

Member
After 2-3 months of this, I sick of this malformed stalemate. It sucks to be powerless to a vocal minority so devoid of any reading or critical thinking skills beyond that there can't even be a good discussion on it with any sane "GG" person. The whole "SJW" rhetoric is such bullshit, and worse is probably the idea that this movement can "win." I am literally at loss of what to say about GG, except the fact that is piled on more shit that Dragon Age 2.

In a sense, GG is over. Considering GG is shuned so much so that anyone bringing up "ethics in games" at any gaming convention would just be laughed at, GG holds no credible merit. But these people will always exist, which will always fucking scare me.

Also the "both sides" argument is trash. Don't try to justify harassment on both sides when the start of this movement was judging and Doxxing a game dev who supposedly slept with someone.

And I'm not suprised TB is gross, considering he censored Shawn Elliott on twitter via the "TotalBiscuit" brand. Funny for how a guy who wants "ethics," he's probably doing it purely for the hits and cash.
 

Omnipunctual Godot

Gold Member
hmm... classic #GG.

  • Present wild accusation as fact.
  • Evidence/Analysis comes out that it's mostly or completely not true.
  • Backpedal and claim you were only presenting possible evidence
  • repeat
Can you be anymore condescending? It's pretty gross behavior, frankly. I don't feel comfortable enough to make lists about "classic anti-GGer" behavior here, I would think that sort of thing would be frowned upon in what is supposed to be civil discussion.

Also, your first point is factually incorrect, and I've stated why about three separate times in the last hour.
 

Mesoian

Member
gXk47Cf.png


The ego on this guy.

judge-dredd-3.jpg
 
Aw, geez....



If I got mad at everyone who was really mean to me, I'd be become a mean person. :S
Oh, I agree! But at the same time, there's a certain point where I can't help but despise people. Cernovich was the first one that came to mind in this case. Fat couch guy and white supremecist on paper guy are too comical for me to despise.
 

JackDT

Member
I keep seeing Total Biscuit talk about how outraged he is at 'being called dead' and how the suspicious timing suggests they secretly coordinated this 'attack on gamers' to maximize the power of this death spell by hitting all at the same time and I'm just... W. T. F. I just can't believe he's arguing this in good faith any more.

Does he actually feel that way about a bunch of articles that are all citing or linking to the original, a bunch of blogs doing a 'take' on another is something you see every day on the internet. (Roundup of the articles in this post: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=132616610&postcount=7856 Seriously look at this list.)

The RPS 'attack' is literally a single sentence and a quoted paragraph: http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2014/09/01/the-monday-papers-4/ but that's enough to have people organize campaigns to email RPS sponsors to tell them if they don't pull advertisement from RPS, they will no longer by their products. Rock Paper Shotgun is trying to kill gamers!

For people in this thread who are really angry at being called dead, I really urge to watch the notorious game-haters Extra Credits make the same argument in 2012: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8HXJLTtMIHU&t=2m5s They say that gaming would be better off without the 'gamer' label which is defined by a stereotype. Then go back and read those 10 articles. Really. A lot of us, me included, felt pretty distant from the 'gamer' label after seeing Five Guys blow up all over mainstream gaming communities.
 

MYeager

Member
Can you be anymore condescending? It's pretty gross, frankly. I don't feel comfortable enough to make claims about "classic anti-GGer" behavior here, I would think that sort of thing would be frowned upon in a what is supposed to be civil discussion.

Yep, let's keep it civil. He was originally responding to a post I made thinking I was referring to that facebook post, I didn't actually know that existed just that people were talking about Denton infiltrating them. I'm glad he shared it so that I could have a reference for the discussion I mentioned.

That it's fake is weird enough, but that it's fake and different people think it's part of a larger conspiracy and that the 8chan guy verified it's authenticity before it was shown to be a lie is just another part of this circus of wonders that is somehow related to ethics in game journalism.
 
What exactly is "not your shield"? A group of people of color who support Gamergate?

it's pretty close to a lethal dose of irony. gamergaters claiming that because there are women and people of color you can't use women and people of color as a shield for anti-gamergate.
 
What exactly is "not your shield"? A group of people of color who support Gamergate?

A bunch of [not cis white men] who:

1. claim to be "sick" of being used as a shield by ... idk, sjws? (because "sjw" = all white men, according to some art I've seen made by GG)

2. Show how sick they are of this treatment by acting like a shield for GG.
 

vcc

Member
Can you be anymore condescending? It's pretty gross, frankly. I don't feel comfortable enough to make lists about "classic anti-GGer" behavior here, I would think that sort of thing would be frowned upon in a what is supposed to be civil discussion.

Your behavior has earned my condescension. The tactics you are using (consciously or unconsciously) are extremely transparent.

You're now playing the victim. You're going to be mortified that I'd be so mean to someone like you who is just an impartial third party out to seek the truth.

Gosh. How is an impartial and earnest person like yourself supposed to live with the weight of my accusations.
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
None on the lets say ethical "side" encourages unlawful, harmful behaviour. The Gamergate side? Well, it started with harassment. Was driven by antifeminism. That has been key motivators.

But feel free to paint harassers and antifeminists as equals to those who got harassed, nudes leaked, received death threats for being women and/or feminists. Please do, its amusing.

Please tell me more about how I equate the two. I love hearing how your defense must paint anyone who dares disagree with you or points out the flaw in people saying in this thread "show us proof that anti-GG did something bad" must obviously equate the two. That's a load of crap, and I think I speak for more than myself when I say I'm getting tired of people who are so radicalized trying to immediately paint any pointing out of anti-GG doing something not 100% ethical as "oh you are saying the two are equal hur hur hur". No. No one has said that here. Nowhere in my statements is that even implied.

Screw you. You have no right to put words in my mouth, or ascribe my motivation. There is no way on earth doxxing someone is equal to freaking threatening someone at a convention, or threatening a school shooting. So screw you for having the lack of empathy and being so hellbent on demonization that anyone who dares point anything out that doesn't fit your specific worldview must be painted as evil incarnate.

The problem is that there's too much ill-will going on. It then becomes a "who started it" situation and the problem keeps going.

No one should wish ill-will on anyone. EVER. Especially not Zoe, Bri and Anita while they are already being targeted for petty, stupid reasons.

While I despise what GG people are doing, I don't despise them. No one deserves any ill will and I wish everyone would let that sink in.

A-freaking-men. I've seen what happens when folks do eye for an eye. It...ends poorly. Thankfully the Anti-GG crowd have stayed away from that for the most part.

Gaming is what made feminism personal for me too.

I feel like i went through this cultural epiphany with the onset of in-game voice chat. I did not realize what an unwelcoming place it was for women, simply because they are women. At some point I felt an ownership of the culture, and tried my best to make that aspect unacceptable in my house and in my bubble.
GG is that disappointed feeling all over again, that my subculture has ugly parts willing to house a hate group. I again don't want it, in fact, I want it out, and speak to that end. I have more fun when we are all having fun.

Anecdote: Last night I went on a raid in Destiny with some random people and we didn't know each other. One was a girl, with her gender hinted at in her name. no one gave her extra shit. What was amazing about it is how relieved I was. I wish that was the norm.

Ditto. I don't get why we would want to throw a fit about more people coming into our world. That's what we have wanted for so damn long, isn't it? To be sort of accepted for our weird (at the time) form of entertainment?? Like, growing up we all joked about how there are no women in our culture and how much that sucked. Now they want to come and we freak out??? I want to like, reach out and smack all of them.
 

MotherFan

Member
I kind of agree and probably could have worded it better, but I want to make a distinction.

Here's the thing. It's when women* speak out against systematic problems (like employment, representation, sexism etc.) that they get harassed. Or gaming publications that do the same. When highlighting systematic issues, the "MRA type personalities" go into defense mode and attack, defending the systematic inequality. Because if gaming was "fine" and there were a few bad apples, there would be nothing for that group to defend.

I guess using "hatred for women" kinda was a bad way to word it. What I mean was: there's systematic inequality or systematic sexism, defended by organized misogyny/hatred for women.

And by systematic I mean, inherent in the system or the way this industry/community is organized. Through demographics of both consumers and producers, culture, demand etc.

Systematic should not be interpreted as me saying "all/most male gamers are misogynists".

*I know men also speak out against these things, but they don't get punished in the same way.

I agree with this. I think this is magnified in the gaming community itself and it is worse for women.
 

Galactic Fork

A little fluff between the ears never did any harm...
I don't think that this shows a systemic hate for women. I think what it does show is that there is alot of mysogyny in the video game community and that it has a very vocal minority of redpill and MRA type personalities that are skilled at using the internet.

So I know the proper way to respond to this, what would you see as a "systemic hate for women"?
 
If only twitter had italics. Maybe it's supposed to be talking to SJWs, saying #NotYourShield, since they're already being used by #GamerGate.
 

zeldablue

Member
I would see it as majority of a community that had a dislike of women simply because they are women.

The culture of gaming is pretty well known for branding women as "non-gamers," fake gamers, attention whores or manipulators.

I feel like that says it all. :\
 

Galactic Fork

A little fluff between the ears never did any harm...
I would see it as majority of a community that had a dislike of women simply because they are women.
That's not what systemic means. Systemic would be a built in mechanism. As in say, the idea of the loud minority is a default feature that is just accepted. A large portion of those that aren't directly affected by this feature ignore it because it's "just the way things are". This causes those that are directly affected by it to become othered because they aren't seen as default features of the community, they have to work around the misogyny.
 

Lime

Member
I just tried to check out some GG discussions beyond GAF, like on RPGcodex and Obsidian Forums and it's vertigo-inducing to see people staunchly defending Gamergate still.
 
And yet you have systematic, targeted, and vehement attacks and harassment from men against women on the internet. And why is it allowed to continue? Because other men don't do anything about it. They ignore it. They leave it for the affected party to fight.

Hell, Felicia Day was doxxed for saying GamerGate made her nervous, but Chris Kluwe was left also after attacking GamerGaters in every way a person could think.

I can totally see why someone previously hurt by men would not want us around.

Yep the difference in how Felicia Day and Chris Kluwe were treated is all you need to know
 

JackDT

Member
Dan Golding also noted that he wrote the only article to literally say 'games are dead'... yet Leigh Alexander and another woman he merely cited in his piece got almost all the vitriol directed at them.
 

bonercop

Member
Please tell me more about how I equate the two. I love hearing how your defense must paint anyone who dares disagree with you or points out the flaw in people saying in this thread "show us proof that anti-GG did something bad" must obviously equate the two.

I'd just like to point out you haven't been able to. Boogie got doxxed around the same time he was posting in the GG thread on GAF, true.

...What makes you think it was GAFfers who doxxed him rather than other GGers punishing him for insufficient ideological purity?
That's a load of crap, and I think I speak for more than myself when I say I'm getting tired of people who are so radicalized trying to immediately paint any pointing out of anti-GG doing something not 100% ethical as "oh you are saying the two are equal hur hur hur". No. No one has said that here. Nowhere in my statements is that even implied.

The problem with this idea, and the part where the false equivalence becomes apparent, is that anti-GG does not exist. I highly doubt many people posting in this thread identify with that label. There are no sekrit anti-GG forums where people plan out who should be harassed next and post other people's personal information.
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
Gamergate started as extreme harassment campaign against women and feminists. Anti-GG actions have been a response, with the worst thing being... doxxing?

Which I completely agree with. (Well, it's probably now more of a culture war thing, but I'd refer back to the Vox & PopeHat articles for that)

But saying that I think they're equal in order to demonize me because I called folks out who were saying that Anti-GG did "nothing"? That's bullshit. You don't get to ascribe my thoughts on all this because heaven forbid our side do anything wrong. We're slipping into the same bullshit rhetorical tactics the GG'ers have been using all this time; and we have no need to because we're decent human beings on the side of equality. We don't need to turn into dicks as well.

Yep the difference in how Felicia Day and Chris Kluwe were treated is all you need to know

..the entire thing with Felicia Day just disgusts me. Someone who was a gamer long before it was a cool thing to be and helped make gaming mainstream by taking a huge risk with the Guild getting doxxed is ...ugh. Ugh.
 

JackDT

Member
Reading the TB post about how #GamerGate is good because they donated to TFYC.. it just hit me how totally messed up that is.

To show #GamerGate isn't about the harassment of Zoe Quinn... people donated to a charity* because it was saying bad things about Zoe Quinn.

*(not actually a charity)
 

MotherFan

Member
The culture of gaming is pretty well known for branding women as "non-gamers," fake gamers, attention whores or manipulators.

I feel like that says it all. :\

Ya, your right here.

Galactic Fork said:
That's not what systemic means. Systemic would be a built in mechanism. As in say, the idea of the loud minority is a default feature that is just accepted. A large portion of those that aren't directly affected by this feature ignore it because it's "just the way things are". This causes those that are directly affected by it to become othered because they aren't seen as default features of the community, they have to work around the misogyny.

I think your right in the loud minority is accepted as "impossible to change".
 

Ayt

Banned
Gamergate started as extreme harassment campaign against women and feminists. Anti-GG actions have been a response, with the worst thing being... doxxing?

What is anti-gg anyway? I'm also strongly anti-neonazi. If a neonazi gets murdered tonight, is that blood somehow on my hands as well?
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
I'd just like to point out you haven't been able to. Boogie got doxxed around the same time he was posting in the GG thread on GAF, true.

...What makes you think it was GAF who doxxed him rather than other GGers punishing him for insufficient ideological purity?

Seeing as the meter long boner GG is having for anyone who even remotely agrees with them, despite their past ideological stances (see: Nero) makes me think it would be odd for them to do so. I don't think anyone on GAF actually doxxed him; I'd like to think no one here is that much of an asshole.

To be perfectly honest, I wouldn't be surprised if a chunk of the doxxing all-around is just 4chan causing chaos because they can. Weren't there chat logs specifically saying their goal was to cause chaos on both sides? But since many of the doxxes (including Felicia Day) haven't been claimed by anyone, I'm going to assume that people are doxxing the side that they are opposed to. (Hence the assumption that Brianna Wu, Maddy Myers, Felicia Day, were doxxed by crazy mofos in GG).

The problem with this idea, and the part where the false equivalence becomes apparent, is that anti-GG does not exist. I highly doubt many people posting in this thread identify with that label. There are no sekrit anti-GG forums where people plan out who should be harassed next and post other people's personal information.

I'm just using anti-GG as a catch all term for those of us that think GG is insane and don't agree with it. Hell, so much of our derision for GG is based on the fact that they really don't have a point or any real goals besides "we don't like feminism in our video games and we're terrified it might start to come into them". I mean no equivalence in terms of tactics, planning, etc. Though it might not be a bad idea for those of us who feel GG is a bad thing to also email advertisers & developers and tell them how much we do like adding diversity to games.
 

Odrion

Banned
A bunch of [not cis white men] who:

1. claim to be "sick" of being used as a shield by ... idk, sjws? (because "sjw" = all white men, according to some art I've seen made by GG)

2. Show how sick they are of this treatment by acting like a shield for GG.
I think it's the (stupid) belief that the gaming "sjw" media are a bunch of white men claiming to be a voice for women and minorities, using them as a platform to show off how morally superior they are. So if you were against the gaming "sjw" media, you would be against women and minorities.

So what #notyourshield does is say that #gamergate is an issue that concerns minorities and women as well, and has their support. I've seen some even claim that #gamergate HAS more minorities and women in it than the organizations they're attacking, and that #gamergate is the true voice of the minority.

it's real dumb

edit: Gaf didn't doxx boogey, a bunch of ex-goons did.
 

mo60

Member
I just looked at the Nick Denton post and it looks like he's being sarcastic or joking in parts of that post. I hope no one believes he actually did any of this stuff without actual proof.
 
a bunch of ex-goons did.

Was that ever confirmed? I saw people claim it came from either SA or Reddit, but never quite understood how they figured.



Also I just finished the Pakman & Arthur video. Arthur pretty much hit the nail on the head that Pakman's just oblivious to context to a degree where it's harmful.

Also interesting how Pakman's more interested in talking about Arthur than GG lol, did he even ask a single GG related question?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom