scoobidoo112
Member
You know, you're totally right and I feel stupider than I have in a long time. I was not in any way saying that death threats shouldn't be taken seriously.
I was just hung up on the notion police/FBI deeming something "non-viable". As in, to me that kind of assessment means they've examined the issue and found it to be fraudulent somehow (I dunno, IP being in India or some other evidence which proves it lacked intent/ability). Because otherwise I would have expected them to use language like "low-risk" or "unlikely" or whatever, "non-viable" to me seemed more certain. And with the press release stating that there was no risk to students and so on it seemed somewhat contradictory. But of course you guys are right, it's not exactly complicated.
There's no need to feel stupid. The authorities made an assessment, namely that there was no viable threat to anyone (based on that single threat), but took extra safety precautions just in case, as assessments can be wrong and you never know if other, not-so-vocal (and genuinely dangerous) unstable people feel inspired by the violent rhetoric that resides in various parts of the GamerGate movement.
The public statement should have been clearer in its language. I can easily see how one can be confused by that.