Don't hate me, but what does ADS stand for?
So no ADS for the Assault Rifle and pistol? cool.
I second this.
So no ADS for the assault rifle and pistol? Good.
Youre not arguing against anything I said. I don't mind ADS. I don't think it KILLS halo like you do. I also don't think it solves stagnation. What I like about the idea of it is that 343 is at least trying something "new".introducing ADS is not innovating, like, at all. It's also the opposite of solving the shooter stagantion since aside from Counter strike (which is having a huge popularity boost) almost every shooter uses it.
First of all Halo was the only and still the only shooter that does what it does. A good game doesn't need to be innovative. Halo is not just about the trinity. It is about movement, map control, weapon control, and fundamentally your skill level. Halo focus more on skill than anything else.You take out any of those elements it is no longer Halo. If we are not able to jump, strafe, and move like we were able to do in the previous iterations with using ADS then the game is no longer Halo. I am just waiting until tomorrow and during the beta before 343 get my hate.
It is possible to have ADS with all the stuff on the left (minus visible weapon, that's better anyways)
There is ADS for all weapons, he's probably just not using it in that particular moment.
So the drama of the day is people are complaining about sprint, while also complaining they want mindless running and gunning.
Also, having to slow down to aim at something is apparently handholding, as opposed to just hip firing everything, no matter what the distance is.
Makes absolutely no fucking sense to me.
Shinobiwhat's your source?
what's your source?
If this is the case, why? Spartans get a camera link to their scope inside their helmets. They have literally zero use for actually looking down their sights. You think they would just retcon that for no reason at all?
You're getting a lot of that here too, unfortunately.Wow, after getting membership here, I don't know why I go anywhere else to talk about design choices. The best I get is "THEY'RE BOTH PRETTY MUCH TEH SAME". It's disheartening :/
Heal me GAF in thine knowledgeable, relatively tranquil light
There is ADS for all weapons, he's probably just not using it in that particular moment.
How can people still have such shitty cameras? Even the cheapest mobile has a decent camera these days...
One of those great unanswerable mysteries I guess...
http://a.pomf.se/qmzopi.webm
http://a.pomf.se/ijlaqp.webm
http://a.pomf.se/zdpquo.webm
If we're going to be realistic/ accurate about it, then it doesn't make any sense for any soldier to hold their weapon the way they do in the game... On the side and just walking around lol, I'm sure spartan soldiers do hold it in front of them from time to time, heck we've seen it in Halo Legends as well.
I think he thrusted forward with an ability.What's the deal here? Is it just the animation of him moving?...
As was said in the other thread I'm thinking that the sight might be an attachment. It doesn't sit on the weapon well.
That would mean the return of loadouts, though.
What's the deal here? Is it just the animation of him moving?...
Looks like Halo.
But you guys went nuts about 2 seconds and no facts.
Shinobi
When a mechanic adds new risk/reward decisions it should be definitely considered imho. Halo has always been a hipfire game so I think the design should favor that, but including ADS to allow a player to sacrifice mobility and situational awareness to help land shots at a weapons maximum range seems like a positive.introducing ADS is not innovating, like, at all. It's also the opposite of solving the shooter stagantion since aside from Counter strike (which is having a huge popularity boost) almost every shooter uses it.
As was said in the other thread I'm thinking that the sight might be an attachment. It doesn't sit on the weapon well.
That would mean the return of loadouts, though.
Peeps on GAF overreact or nah?
NO ADS