the suspension is pretty shitty considering this is part of the game's content with nudity found in many places
I would like to read the ESRB ratings
https://www.esrb.org/ratings/search.aspx?from=home&titleOrPublisher=watch dogsContent Descriptors: Blood, Intense Violence, Nudity, Sexual Themes, Strong Language, Use of Drugs
Other: Online Interactions Not Rated by the ESRB (Windows PC, PlayStation 4, Xbox One)
Rating Summary: This is an action-adventure game in which players assume the role of a man (Marcus Holloway) who joins forces with a hacker group intent on exposing corruption in the San Francisco Bay Area.
As players explore the open-world environment, they can complete mission-based objectives, interact with characters, and engage in combat with criminals and rival gangs. Players use machine guns, shotguns, assault rifles, and explosives to kill enemy thugs and/or civilians; killing civilians, however, may negatively affect their progress.
Fire fights are often accompanied by realistic gunfire, large explosions, and blood-splatter effects. Some sequences contain additional acts of violence: a man bleeding out and dying from a stab wound; a man shot and killed by an officer.
The game contains some sexual material: a man selling child pornography over the phone (no sexual acts or nudity depicted); a strip club depicting pole dancers and topless women; brief instances of male and female full-frontal nudity (e.g., a woman in body paint; a man standing with a woman outdoors).
During the course of the game, characters are depicted smoking marijuana and using needles to inject themselves with drugs; in one sequence, the player's screen warps and blurs after consuming mushrooms laced with acid. The words f**k, sh*t, and a*shole are heard in the dialogue.
I still don't see where the ban makes sense. It's a game for adults, with adult content. How can Sony punish someone for sharing game content that they allowed on the system, with tools they provided? If anything they should have made the nudity unable to be recorded; I bet they probably think the OP did this on his own, with photoshop or whatever, and have no clue that this stuff is in game.Thanks for the info. In that case, the ban makes sense. Is there any way to disable that and just share directly on Twitter etc.?
Its somewhat "funny" that a game itself is perfectly fine, but sharing pictures from it is not. Its not like that the images are user generated content that were created either, its content that the developers themself made.
Yes but doing so also removes all your other automatic PSN feed posts such as what game you just purchased, trophies just earned, recent new friends, etc....Thanks for the info. In that case, the ban makes sense. Is there any way to disable that and just share directly on Twitter etc.?
Its somewhat "funny" that a game itself is perfectly fine, but sharing pictures from it is not. Its not like that the images are user generated content that were created either, its content that the developers themself made.
I love that in a game that allows someone to murder hundreds of people but be "the good guy", people are more upset about genital textures.
We live in fucked up times.
You're right, it's much better to drop a toilet on someone.
Someone on your friendslist must have found it offensive otherwise it'd have gone unnoticed.Here's Sony's guidelines for sharing that mentions sexual content
If this content is deemed "sexually offensive" then why are you allowing developers to put it on your platform?
It's the next game's preorder bonus.Now Ubisoft can add 'iconic vagina' to their Watch Dogs franchise buzzword repertoire.
Are you saying this is gonna be huge? I should go back to that show, I haven't seen it in years and never saw it all.
Pfffffffffttt...Now that's what I call box art
I still don't see where the ban makes sense. It's a game for adults, with adult content. How can Sony punish someone for sharing game content that they allowed on the system, with tools they provided? If anything they should have made the nudity unable to be recorded; I bet they probably think the OP did this on his own, with photoshop or whatever, and have no clue that this stuff is in game.
I fail to see why this is an issue. Sure, if you were to see the vagina of one character, and it was visible whilst everything else was covered, then you have an issue. However, the fact you can see the vagina, penis, and breasts of multiple characters in the city make is an non issue.
Ubisoft have decided that nudity, regardless of gender, is not taboo for their game, and believe it should not be feared whilst gore and profanity are glorified.
The childish reaction of some in this thread to viewing the images are a much bigger issues than the content itself.
Did you miss the videos where it showed the main character pulling out an AK-47 and shooting while hacking?Did not know Watchdogs was so explicit/violent , thought was just a game where you wandered haking stuff but it looks more like GTA plus the hacking stuff.
The game looks fun but not really a fan of GTA violent approach
Don't they get to choose who they want to follow? I'd rather stop following someone than get them banned for posting screenshots I don't like.Someone on your friendslist must have found it offensive otherwise it'd have gone unnoticed.
You choose what you play and what you share on your PSN social feed. Others don't get to choose what they see from your social feed. That's common sense.
Because the tool they provide for sharing has aown set of rulles that ppl may follow. The game is rated for mature audience, now if u share a mature image or video on PSN that dont allow that type of content you risk a suspension. Is not that hard to understand.I still don't see where the ban makes sense. It's a game for adults, with adult content. How can Sony punish someone for sharing game content that they allowed on the system, with tools they provided? If anything they should have made the nudity unable to be recorded; I bet they probably think the OP did this on his own, with photoshop or whatever, and have no clue that this stuff is in game.
Damn, Trump isn't even in office yet.
How do you know someone you innocently added to your friendslist is going to post vag on their PSN feed in the future?Don't they get to choose who they follow? I'd rather stop following someone than get them banned for posting screenshots I don't like.
GAF, is this progressive or sexist?
Someone on your friendslist must have found it offensive otherwise it'd have gone unnoticed.
You choose what you play and what you share on your PSN social feed. Others don't get to choose what they see from your social feed. That's common sense.
Yea haha, sharing screens and clips shooting and murdering people is a-okay, but sexual content?!?! BANNED!A vagina? In my murder simulator? NOT ON MY WATCH!
You can beat the game without killing anyone, first weapon you get is a stun gun with unlimited ammo.Did not know Watchdogs was so explicit/violent , thought was just a game where you wandered haking stuff but it looks more like GTA plus the hacking stuff.
The game looks fun but not really a fan of GTA violent approach
Do you disagree? What other games can you name that show the female anatomy in such detail?
Your account was snatched by Sony
I'll see my way out
But wouldnt it be acceptable under Trump?Damn, Trump isn't even in office yet.
Are you serious?If this content is deemed "sexually offensive" then why are you allowing developers to put it on your platform?
Why is extreme violence okay but nudity is not?
We can kill a shit load of people in the most graphic ways possible but not show any skin?
It's not like there are any sex acts occurring, they're just nude.
So the nude human body is inherently sexual?
What a dumb fucking policy, it's in the fucking game.
It says a lot about our world when showing tons of realistic violence is okay but a vagina is some terrible thing.
no, you can find nudists with fully rendered full frontal nudity in the game
again, VERY nsfw
this too. NSFW