Windom Earle
Member
Got my new MM XL today. Viewing angles are outstanding, so I guess I have an IPS!
Here's the video of the banding effect :
http://youtu.be/mCWqZ7K0RI0
Level S6-5, so at the end of the game, sorry.
You can also see the edge shimmering but it's not very conclusive.
If I must describe the two displays, I would say the IPS is better at handling detailed 3d games and for all 2d games, results may vary between the content displayed, you could have cases where the picture is clearly better than the TN display and some where it's worse. Majora's mask, smash bros and MH4 all look better on the IPS display, NSMB 3D land and pullblox look better on the TN.
The TN display is very consistent and will handle all content the same no matter what.
If the gamma level of the TN display was properly calibrated, it would be a clear winner for me, even with the black trail issue on light background.
For me it's a matter of trading acurate gamma level against consistency, gamma level are winning but it's a close one and I can't say I'm satisfied with the IPS display.
EDIT: First ghost house is M4-4 and you can see awfull case of banding on the yellow moving platform and on red carpet. I Think it has something to do on how the game is rendered in those stages specificaly. I don't remember the effect being this ugly on the TN display. The artists must have created those stage with the TN display in mind and the IPS doesn't work well with the dark/foggy atmosphere.
Was super excited to receive the GameStop Bundle in the mail yesterday. But then discovered that my precious Majora Mask system has the inferior TN Screen. I called Nintendo Repair. Explained the situation regarding TN vs IPS. They put me on hold while they consulted and none of their technicians are aware of this being an issue.
How is it that Nintendo techs are not aware of this?
I am so bummed over the screen. Planing on packing it up to return to GameStop.
that's not the scan line effect, its moire from camera focus. the scan line thing is noticeable in person but I don't think it can be captured in pictures as it seems to be the screen flickering in some fashion. its hard to explain but once you see its easy to point out.
in person if you have ips and move the screen around physically and track it with your eyes looking for something that looks almost like interlacing. it can be quite noticeable in games with solid colors or the default menu theme. I returned two ips n3dsxls and one had this problem very badly especially along the bottom of the screen. it also had it vertically along the left side. on the second 3ds it was barely there, very faint a non issue however it had 4 dead pixels.
Your OGxl looks like it has a pretty decent calibration while the ips are pushing green/red. My OG is similar and looked better in menu than the n3ds screens but In game, I found the ips does shine through. there is also noticeable motion blur on the tn. to test this I used music park in Mario kart 7. when you go around the sharp turns the thin space between keys look jaggy on the ips. on the tn they smear but if you pause and youll notice its just like the ips.
It's not an issue and the screen is not inferior by nintendo standard. They can't fix what isn't broken. That's why it's important to buy the 3ds from a retailer with lenient return policy in order to get a nearly perfect one and it's very hard. There's lot of combination of flaws you can get so a TN 3ds could be superior to an IPS one. You need to find one and be satisfied with it.
When I got the IPS, I was disappointed, but now I'm more comfortable with the handheld and I don't focus on the flaws anymore and just enjoy the games.
It really is an issue. There's a big distinction between the two types is screens.It's not an issue and the screen is not inferior by nintendo standard. They can't fix what isn't broken. That's why it's important to buy the 3ds from a retailer with lenient return policy in order to get a nearly perfect one and it's very hard. There's lot of combination of flaws you can get so a TN 3ds could be superior to an IPS one. You need to find one and be satisfied with it.
When I got the IPS, I was disappointed, but now I'm more comfortable with the handheld and I don't focus on the flaws anymore and just enjoy the games.
It really is an issue. There's a big distinction between the two types is screens.
I prefer the look of the IPS screen and lucked out with a black unit with one. Today is realized the bottom screen has either dust under the screen or a dead pixel :/
Decision to make now is if I want to play the game again and hope I get another IPS and no pixel issues.
I don't think you understand that some people justifiably consider the TN to not be as good as the IPS screen. Just because Nintendo 'chooses' to do this bullshit doesn't mean there is no issue. I imagine variance among displays of the same type are going to be quite negligible compared to the differences between the two types overall.Differences between two units don't necessarily imply an issue.
The displays were chosen by nintendo, you can't complain and ask for a refund when your unit is perfectly functional and is not faulty.
Even between two consoles with the same display type, you can still have a big difference in quality.
You can also have a looser hinge.
The big issue is the poor quality control of nintendo, not the type of display. I would be fine with both of my n3dsxl if the qc was good.
Now I need to chose between IPS properly calibrated screen riddled with scanlines and a loose hinge, and a perfect unit with a TN screen with gamma levels set too high.
I don't think you understand that some people justifiably consider the TN to not be as good as the IPS screen. Just because Nintendo 'chooses' to do this bullshit doesn't mean there is no issue. I imagine variance among displays of the same type are going to be quite negligible compared to the differences between the two types overall.
This is not ok to some of us.
How is it that Nintendo techs are not aware of this?
If you send it in for repair, they'll only replace the bottom screen.
Also, it's hilarious to hear people complain about scan lines. In the retro community, we pay stupid money for those things.
I don't think you understand that some people justifiably consider the TN to not be as good as the IPS screen. Just because Nintendo 'chooses' to do this bullshit doesn't mean there is no issue. I imagine variance among displays of the same type are going to be quite negligible compared to the differences between the two types overall.
This is not ok to some of us.
Yeah I noticed this few days ago while comparing. here's some comparison shots I took: http://imgur.com/a/8zSHU
I'm now questioning why n3ds doesn't have them. RRP's aren't that different you know.
So how common are these screens? Do most NXL consoles have the IPS screen?
I presume that Nintendo boosted their launch numbers for the new model by using some screens intended for the OG XL model.
So the one I got is an IPS screen on my new MMN3DSXL?
So the one I got is an IPS screen on my new MMN3DSXL?
What case is that?
Yes.
this is false, the new 3ds uses at least two variants of panels and once again nothing is calibrated properly to save money. here's an example of two panels.
the easiest way to check which you have is to watch and see if the wifi indicator washes out or remains readable.
panel A seems to be more common, but it also suffers from a scanline or pwm effect as mentioned in this thread.
panel B is clearly a tn screen. it does not suffer from the scanline issue however the super stable 3D is reported to be much worse with this screen than type A. this might explain why a small number claim the 3D is still crap or worse.
Wait so the one on the right actually looks while with a black screen, when turned to the side? Wow.
Mine is definitely not that. So I must have IPS.
I still don't understand how to tell which screen I have.
Comparing my New and old black XLs side by side, they both look sharp from an angle and neither screen looks yellow. They both look pretty similar and just fine. What am I missing?
Pretty sure only XL's get the IPS.Do we know if the regular non XL n3ds has 100% IPS?
Pretty sure only XL's get the IPS.
The quality of the 3D isn't related to whether a display is IPS or TN, I don't think.So all normal n3DS have worse 3D than the XL one?
The quality of the 3D isn't related to whether a display is IPS or TN, I don't think.
Pretty sure only XL's get the IPS.
^can't tell anything. the tilted shot does look brighter/washed out but that's just because the exposure of the photo as a whole is brighter (as you can see background room detail in the tiled shot but not in the other).
There's really too much glow for me to be able to reliably tell, to be honest - as Mistle said, the camera needs less exposure in the second shot to be able to make a decent comparison.
For what it's worth, if I tilt my own (IPS) 3DS XL by the same amount, this is what it looks like: