Spring-Loaded
Member
Who here actually believed these would look as good as they were originally shown?
Marth and Peach are the main problem childs in this in that they look totally fucked up.
The rest look mostly fine, barring rods to hold shit up being stupid colors instead of translucent white or what appear to be bad batches (like fucked up Kirby eyes).
Lighting, how does it work.
Lighting, how does it work.
You realize that this stuff happens all the time right?
Isn't it only because of a different lightning and maybe a slight Photoshop filter?
That really isn't the case and you know it.Professional vs. amateur pictures.
Welcome to figures that only cost £10.99. It's sad, but expected.
Yeah I am sure the lighting is what removes defined fingers into a blob hand and dulls edges of hair as well. There is a bunch of other differences in the Peach example as well but I wont go into that.
That yellow chunk vs the metallic looking pole is a huge difference in the Link one.
is foot touches the ground in the mass-produced one too.
I also want childrens toys be as sharp as possibleBasically.
And to everyone saying its the lighting I am pretty sure you need your eyes checked.
Yeah I am sure the lighting is what removes defined fingers into a blob hand and dulls edges of hair as well.
I am sure better lighting and a "professional picture" transforms a figures features.
I also want childrens toys be as sharp as possible
This is not a thread about the lighting. The lighting does not influence the frill on Peach's dress, Link's stand, the bent swords, etc.
I do, which is why I said as much in the opening post.
They look so bad. I am glad I am not interested in Amiibos.That really isn't the case and you know it.