Yeah, I was hoping Nintendo learned something with the Wii U, but they are once again making the same mistakes and more.Jesus Christ.
Between the laughable save file system (or lack thereof), the dock scratching, the desync issues, the wifi problems and anemic software launch, this feels like one of the most botched system launches in recent memory. And now Nintendo's nonchalant attitude towards a screen defect? Fuck you Nintendo, Zelda deserves to be on better hardware than this.
Its the stance of every LCD manufacturer I have ever worked with. It depends on where the pixel is and or how many there are. Thats how they have always been about it.How so? They are saying the same thing, just worded slightly differently.
Bottom line is: 'Dead pixels are a thing we accept. We will replace the device if they bother you, but they may still be there or be worse'
This is the stance of Sony, Apple and Nintendo and has been for a long time now.
The original 3DS is much better than the XL. XL has laughable build quality, the screen is bad and the audio is of worse quality, too (and not as loud as in the original 3DS).After the Dark GBA, DS Phat and 3DS it should be obvious that Nintendo always gets handhelds right on the first hardware refresh.
I've always been under the assumption that stuck/dead pixels are part of the luck of the draw for LCD panels.
I've never gotten a device with one, luckily, but with so many hardware makers with this stance, what can you do?
Anybody else read this in the voice of the radio host from Welcome to Night Vale? Especially the last line.There are black or bright dots on the Nintendo Switch screen that do not go away, or there are dark or light patches on the screen.
Small numbers of stuck or dead pixels are a characteristic of LCD screens. These are normal and should not be considered a defect.
But yet Nintendo CS let me exchange my old DS Fat 3 times because I wasn't happy with the screen temperature or speakers until I got a unit I was happy with...
Holy shit dude, is this all you know how to post?
No kidding, lol. That's all I've ever seen him post.
I mean, it's not like you paid a premium or anything.My $2500 MacBook Pro also has a dead pixel. Apple won't fix it for free as they don't consider it a defect either..
This is amazing. 400+ posts because Nintendo has the same policy as every other company that sells products with LCD screens. Tell me again how there's no insane bias against Nintendo?
I've seen others ask this and get ignored, so I'll ask it again just for fun: How many people have had dead/stuck pixels with their Switches and have also had Nintendo refuse to replace them?
tbf it's the correct response to basically everything about the Switch except the games.
Normal? Gtfo
Nintendo dun goofed
0
Someone in here apparently had 3 units with dead pixels, but just exchange in store.
But you know, gotta make a story out of nothing.
Jesus Christ.
Between the laughable save file system (or lack thereof), the dock scratching, the desync issues, the wifi problems and anemic software launch, this feels like one of the most botched system launches in recent memory. And now Nintendo's nonchalant attitude towards a screen defect? Fuck you Nintendo, Zelda deserves to be on better hardware than this.
Pretty much.Considering I have to buy an extra manufacturer insurance if I don't want to play dead pixel roulette with my $700 monitors...
Lol at just flat-out saying this tho.
Damn lmao.
The switch has its problems but some of you are just reaching now. ITS FUCKING PATHETIC.
Small numbers of stuck or dead pixels are a characteristic of LCD screens. These are normal and should not be considered a defect.
Every time a new handheld comes out, I see people having the same melt down. Sony said the same thing about the PSP and the Vita. Nintendo has been saying it since at least the GBA. I've owned laptops where the manufacturer stated it wasn't a defect until you had at least 10 dead pixels. This is industry standard language that literally every manufacturer uses.
Nintendo really almost fooled me into thinking they had their shit together right before launch. But oh man, Nintendo still Nintendo.
Vita went OLED, so dead pixels wouldn't have been an issue. Screen blotches and arguably some oversaturation were bigger issues on the Vita, but it was early gen OLED tech. The black levels and lack of dead pixels/light bleed even on fledging OLED tech puts LCD to shame.
My Vita was super blotchy too.Well yeah for Vita it was for the blotchiness, and let me tell you, my launch Vita is splotchy as fuuuuuuck
Well yeah for Vita it was for the blotchiness, and let me tell you, my launch Vita is splotchy as fuuuuuuck
Luckily I dodged a bullet there. Mines has a few patches but it's probably one of the better ones. I still wouldn't trade it for the new LCD Vitas, ever. Regardless of the ergonomics of the newer Vitas.
Screen quality on a handheld device is simply paramount. Nintendo would have made the Switch amazing if they'd have gone with some form of OLED.
Mine's pretty bad, but it's never bothered me. You can only see it on an all or mostly black screen, and it's a small price to pay for how gorgeous it looks, especially compared to the LCD revision. Launch Vita for life.
That's the stance of virtually all people selling displays. There's a reason you can buy additional warranties to zero defect.This is something I'd expect to see from "shady" Korean monitor sellers on Ebay, not Nintendo.
Or many acknowledge it as a defect if it had a dead or stuck pixel.
This is not a good look Nintendo. Especially when many phone manufactures get screens from other companies and still acknowledge it as a defect.
Ha, what? Most manufacturers and resellers have a limit on how many dead or stuck pixels a panel needs to have before they replace it, but i've never, ever heard someone dismiss it as not being a defect. Until now.
"It's a feature"
Their responses to the issues that have been brought up with the Switch have been horrendous. Totally expected given how dreadful their communication usually is.
Looking through the thread, multiple times it's mentioned that Nintendo is far from the only company to have this stance on dead pixels (Apple included) so why are we giving them so much shit as if they are the only ones? I mean, it's a shitty stance to take, but it's something done by other big companies.