Not sure if this was already posted here?
GTX 1070: http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/geforce-gtx-1070
For the same reason I don't criticize AMD cards for doing poorly on Hairworks. Async is a feature, but it remains to be seen if it will be "heavily utilized" by game developers. Doom is an interesting scenario, because it scales really well with Nvidia cards, and really shitty with AMD cards. I think it just ties into the fact that AMD has really poor support for OpenGL, and always has. It's definitely something to consider, but I wouldn't consider it a great benchmark. I also am big on being an informed consumer so in my mind buy the card that fits games you're going to play--if you really want to play Doom you should factor that into your purchase--or the one that generally wins out within the price range you have.
I don't think AMD squeezing out a bit more in Hitman is that huge of a deal, but I also don't plan on playing that game so I have no problem disregarding it. You have to look at the entirety of benchmarks when making a PC Hardware purchase, and generally the 1080 edges out the 980 Ti by ~30%, and the Fury X by similar numbers. There will always be some variance.
What about 3440x1440 (21:9) ? What does a 1080 change from a 980Ti (since it's probably the power of the 1070) ?
Hmm, this doesn't seem impressive at all. seems like I might have to go for the 1080.
Not sure if this was already posted here?
GTX 1070: http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/geforce-gtx-1070
Hmm, this doesn't seem impressive at all. seems like I might have to go for the 1080.
Check the techgage review from the OP
How does this compare to the 980 Ti?
Courtesy of the dutch site tweakers.netHow does this compare to the 980 Ti?
Courtesy of the dutch site tweakers.net
(I replaced the Dutch terms with English terms except for "miljard" which is billion.)
Do you think AIB-cards will add Pin-connectors? So we get like 8+6? Since 8-pin is limiting the overclocking.
One reviewer said that there's space on the board for it. Then again, maybe it was intentional?
Not sure if this was already posted here?
GTX 1070: http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/geforce-gtx-1070
Not sure if this was already posted here?
GTX 1070: http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/geforce-gtx-1070
Thanks.
So the average fps difference is between 15 and 30fps, mostly around 20, and since the TITAN X gets around 50/60fps average in most recent big games, I believe it'll be great for future games that will need more ressources.
It's a lot of money, maybe not worth it for that 3440x1440 masterrace (at least for me since I need to build a whole PC and buy the monitor and they cost almost as much as the PC itself)
For VR, probably the 1070. Even if multi-perspective rendering doesn't catch on, fine-grained preemption is a boon.You guys think the 980Ti or 1070 will be better for VR.
Horribly phrased.
Let me try again. Which card would be better for VR?
Even for the most basic comparison (ignoring architecture differences) you need to multiply all the specs by the clock rate.Not an expert, but this dosn't look too good?
In a lot of aspects looks even worse than a 980, less cuda cores, less SM's, etc..I know new architecture and all and that that data dosn't tell the full history, but isn't a bit dissapointing considering the price?.
Witcher 3 performance seems particularly good on 1080. Basically a 100% jump from a 970 at higher resolutions.
I have a 970 with a 3440x1440p monitor...I need that 1080 to run the games like how I want.
Not an expert, but this dosn't look too good?
In a lot of aspects looks even worse than a 980, less cuda cores, less SM's, etc..I know new architecture and all and that that data dosn't tell the full history, but isn't a bit dissapointing considering the price?.
I'd expect >500 for the FE and ~450 for the non-FE.So, how much are we expecting a 1070 to cost? I didn't really want to go above 400 but looks like there's some confusion/speculation with the prices thanks to the funders editions.
I would buy the 1080 Day One at $599, even with a shitty cooler, as I'm going to water cool it. But waiting for EK + waiting for a reasonable price is really killing my hype
I'd expect >500 for the FE and ~450 for the non-FE.
$380 US list price + relatively weak + average 20% tax.
How does it fair with Dark Souls 3's more performance heavy areas? Or were thoese CPU limited?
I am surprised of how cheap and yet so much more powerful this is. But i will sill wait for a 1080Ti.
70 percent more pixelsWow the framerate jump from 1440p to 1080p in Tomb Raider is nuts
I don't get why people are comparing a 1080 to a 980ti and brushing it off as nothing. Shouldn't they be comparing it to a 980? 70 to 90 percent increase in performance?
I feel like the 1080ti should be directly compared to the 980ti.
If anything, seeing the 1080 outperforming flagship maxewell cards has me more than excited for its bigger sibling. It would be awesome if we could get 70 percent increase in performance. Hell, even 40-50 would be impressive to me.
I think those of you who have waited 4 years for this shrink in die can wait a little longer for the definitive version of the GP100 line.I did sort of had a moment of weakness a tear ago and bought a laptop with a 980m.
Then another 4 years down the Line GV200 will. All according to plan.
Why would you ever get the idea that 1070 will perform below 980, OC or not? It will massacre 980 (probably performing around 980ti level or slightly below it).So, 980 OC prices for slightly lower performance?
EK will have a block at launch. And several pc enthusiast sites have tested the FE with an aftermarket cooling solution and in all cases the limiting factor is not temperature but voltage/power delivery. If you want to push past 2.1 Ghz you will need a AIB partner card.EK usually hits right on launch with their stuff. My guess is you'll be waiting longer for a reasonably priced AIB model than you will for a waterblock. One thing to think about since you're going to be putting your card underwater: you might want a card with an additional 6/8 pin connector to deliver more power.
There are two walls the FE cards are hitting when overclocking. The first is temps, which are limited by the reference blower. You'll be addressing that when you add the card to your loop. The second is voltage. Even with a modded bios to increase the voltage limit, you can only deliver so much over a PCIe slot and one 6-pin connector. I don't know how much further the 1080 can go beyond 2.1-2.2 Ghz, but it seems clear that you won't be able to go any further than that without being able to feed the card more power, regardless of temps.
Courtesy of the dutch site tweakers.net
(I replaced the Dutch terms with English terms except for "miljard" which is billion.)
I'd expect >500 for the FE and ~450 for the non-FE.
$380 US list price + relatively weak + average 20% tax.
Why would you ever get the idea that 1070 will perform below 980, OC or not? It will massacre 980 (probably performing around 980ti level or slightly below it).
We shouldn't look at 2Ghz like it's some super OC - what matters is percentage over stock.
And stock boost is around 1770
so 2050Mhz boost is modest 13% oc (i'm getting bit more oc on my reference 980ti)
even 2400Mhz would be 35% oc which is similar gain as high end AIB 980 ti had
Yeah, silly him for asking a question relevant to the very thread we are in.
Geez, what is up with this thread?
Buyers should also be aware that these sites all use overclocked $1000 cpus. Because AMD sucks at dx11 driver overhead this will massively benefit them. Hell, better cpus might even be part of the reason why AMD cards get better over time versus Nvidia.
Obviously most people don't have $1000 cpu's so the results on these sites aren't actually representative of the performance they will get. Whereas with Nvidia cpus matter way less. I bet if they were to do these benchmarks on a 2500k you will get very different results.
Probably because they are the only 8 core CPUs slow enough sequentially for parallelization to be at all beneficial in current gaming scenarios.The only 8 core cpu's that show improvement with dx12 seem to be the AMD FX series. Maybe thats what your referring to.
How does this compare to the 980 Ti?
Courtesy of the dutch site tweakers.net
(I replaced the Dutch terms with English terms except for "miljard" which is billion.)
The GTX 1070 looks like a slightly boosted GTX 980 according to this....