This is literally a thread about rendering tech so yes obviously that would be what they are looking at and what we are discussing. Do us all a favor and take your childish crusade elsewhere.
You're fooling yourself if you think any game won't. Especially considering games like Star Citizen are coming out, which let's be honest already look better in the unfinished state aside from the character models and animations which are going still in development.
I'm not the one name calling buddy. Don't take my criticism towards the game as an attack on you.
You're fooling yourself if you think any game won't. Especially considering games like Star Citizen are coming out, which let's be honest already look better in the unfinished state aside from the character models and animations which are going still in development.
Your criticism of the game is completely irrelevant to the topic, it seems you just want to derail the thread on purpose.
he pretty much said in the video that those two were interchangeable.Switch The Order and Battlefront and the list is correct.
So the least ambitious and most run of mill designed game has the "best" graphics? umm congrats.
I enjoy nx gamers work and was just pitching in with my opinion on the matter like one would in a open thread. Topic is about the games, I mentioned the game.
Least ambitious in what respect? Gameplay? Because it's certainly not the least ambitious in terms of graphics tech, which is the entire point of this thread.
is horizon running on that engine too? Or a new one?Until Dawn runs on the Killzone Shadowfall engine which is still one of the best looking games this generation.
So it's no surprise the next game using the engine and everything that's been evolved in it looks amazing.
the graphics of that game are among the best of the best these days though, so what are you getting at?Least ambitious as in when you play the game. Everything about it is meant to be in a service to the graphics and nothing else.
is horizon running on that engine too? Or a new one?
The opinion that you pitched in with has nothing to do with what we are discussing.
They definitely should have a mention to halo 5 cutscenes, it's surreal how great they look. As much as I think moving the gameplay to 60fps was the right call, they are so good that part of me wishes they went for 30fps and eye candy on Halo 5.
It depends. In terms of character animation Trico, based of what we've seen of it so far is phenomenal. FFXV should also give it a run for it's money because of the way the combat works.Just don't see SC beating UC in animation .(or any of the other big dogs like AC for eg )
Everything else they should be doing better .
Part of it yes. You know several builds are already playable right?LOL that game is coming when? 2016? Ah
Kind of silly to expect everyone coming into a best graphics thread to take part on the discussion some members are having
And now you started another discussion about me not taking part in your discussion.
Ive never played a game so confined and hand hold-y in my life. The graphics are a given.
Probably. The game's still in the early stages of development, but would I be considered crazy if I said killzone4/until dawn look better than it?I don't think they have said. A modified version would be my guess.
you have a point that you can be ignored, but if you make a post, anyone and everyone can read it and quote it to their forum posting routine and if their response is that your post was instigative, it's on you to respond and explain otherwise.And I didn't quote anyone to further the ongoing discussion. Ignore the message if it bothers you. Kind of silly to expect everyone coming into a best graphics thread to take part on the discussion some members are having. And now you started another discussion about me not taking part in your discussion.
It depends. In terms of character animation Trico, based of what we've seen of it so far is phenomenal. FFXV should also give it a run for it's money because of the way the combat works.
Probably. The game's still in the early stages of development, but would I be considered crazy if I said killzone4/until dawn look better than it?
Least ambitious as in when you play the game. Everything about it is meant to be in a service to the graphics and nothing else.
this is true, but so is infamous second son, witcher 3 & batman 4, one of which made it to this list and the other, lots of people claiming should've.Well it's an open world game, there has to be a trade-off somewhere.
I'm not the one name calling buddy. Don't take my criticism towards the game as an attack on you.
It's not very surprising either because the Ueda entered the industry as an animator. His games have always had pretty next level character animation imho.I totally forget about TLG but yeah animation wise it is very impressive.
It's not very surprising either because the Ueda entered the industry as an animator. His games have always had pretty next level character animation imho.
this is true, but so is infamous second son, witcher 3 & batman 4, one of which made it to this list and the other, lots of people claiming should've.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGPHy4iFoSs
5. Until Dawn
4. Batman Arkham Knight
3. Rise of the Tomb Raider
2. Star Wars Battlefront
1. The Order 1886
I pretty much agree. #1 for sure.
I totally forget about TLG but yeah animation wise it is very impressive.
I'm not sure if you're just trolling now, or if you just can't take the L here in this thread.Apparently I need to say something positive in order to justify criticism. I like the moustaches, they were really cool. Now with that out the way, Ive always correlated graphics with how it serves the game when you are going through it. And yes this game is void of any ambition especially compared to all the games listed and mentioned. Each one of those titles like Metal Gear Solid V(another one I dislike) impresses me more visually than The Order. Can't handle the opinion? move on.
I watched NX gamers analysis of the E3 vid, and he pointed out so many detailed little touches that I missed. It makes me laugh when people say it looks like a PS3 game.
Apparently I need to say something positive in order to justify criticism. I like the moustaches, they were really cool. Now with that out the way, Ive always correlated graphics with how it serves the game when you are going through it. And yes this game is void of any ambition especially compared to all the games listed. Each one of those titles like Metal Gear Solid V(another one I dislike) impresses me more visually than The Order. Can't handle the opinion? move on.
Where's Witcher III? I agree with Order and Batman Arkham Knight from personal experience, but what about Witcher III?
Well thank god Nintendo isn't actually calling it the NX then.But NX hasn't even been formally announced yet 😕
(But seriously, the website is going to have a branding confusion problem soon of Nintendo sticks with NX as the name of its next console.)
right, but you were telling me how horizon may not look as good because of it being open world - I gave examples of games that heralded as having really good graphics despite being open world. Horizon still looks great nonetheless, so perhaps what you meant was it's just showing perhaps the limitations/full potential of that specific engine?They aren't running on the same engine as KZ/UD though, comparisons are much more difficult.
Witcher 3 is a beautiful game no doubt, but on a pure technical level, it can't hang with any of those on the list.
perhaps what you meant was it's just showing perhaps the limitations/full potential of that specific engine?
gotcha. Well. The way the damn game is titled, horizon: zero dawn, makes it kinda obvious that they wanna set this up to turn into a franchise.Yes that's what I was referring to.
Obviously games can look incredible whether they are open-world or not. IMO Batman is up there with the best looking 3rd person games, even if you were to just walk around at street level. AC Unity as well, if it didn't run at about 5 fps.
Apparently I need to say something positive in order to justify criticism. I like the moustaches, they were really cool. Now with that out the way, Ive always correlated graphics with how it serves the game when you are going through it. And yes this game is void of any ambition especially compared to all the games listed. Each one of those titles like Metal Gear Solid V(another one I dislike) impresses me more visually than The Order.
Can't handle the opinion? move on.
right, but you were telling me how horizon may not look as good because of it being open world - I gave examples of games that heralded as having really good graphics despite being open world. Horizon still looks great nonetheless, so perhaps what you meant was it's just showing perhaps the limitations/full potential of that specific engine?
Pointless list really.
I imagine Guerrilla is going to adapt as much as they can from the engine into an open world setting but not everything will make the transition since there is other simulation going on like weather and time of day on a large scale. I'm not worried though, GG always delivers on a technical level. I still think Shadow Fall is one of the best looking games on the platform. I do hope the consistent texture quality carries over into Horizon. Both SF and UD have very pleasing textures, for reasons I can't quite place.
You came into a thread discussing graphics and ranted about gameplay. Yep clearly the only reason people objected to your post was because it was negative and not because it was irrelevant. Regardless of your personal feelings on the matter graphics ≠ gameplay. This thread is about the former not the latter. If you have nothing to say about the actual topic being discussed in this thread then go post in one of the countless other threads about the topic you do want to rant about.
Says the person who came into a thread about graphics to explain that a game you don't like doesn't deserve recognition for its graphical achievements because you hate its gameplay. Yea ok. Maybe you should take your own advice.