davepoobond
you can't put a price on sparks
so, like 5% of 10 million is...500,000?
what does that have to do with this thread topic?nubbe said:Nintendon't break.
Yeah, that's what I don't get. While Sony ****ed up their numbers on the PS3 and made it too expensive of a deal, MS ****ed up their numbers too by lowballing the manufactering costs.StevieP said:$6 manufacturing costs ftw. Petah knows how to dance!
If so, Italy must be amongst the unlucky ones, as almost everyone the uses it frequently experienced the rings of death at least once. Luckily we have two years warranty, so till next december everyone is covered. I'm planning to sell my console and buy a new one by then, so I'll have two more years of warranty. Maybe an Elite.theBishop said:Are the units shipping to other countries more reliable?
scissorfight said:i'm so glad i don't have to worry about this shit
costco ftw
do tellJB1981 said:I guess Peter wasn't there when Arne's co-worker shouted out what the failure rate was at the office. Surely he would've used such a source to put consumers' minds at rest.
Microsoft does what Nintendon't...nubbe said:Nintendon't break.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=6238787&postcount=100shpankey said:do tell
Mojovonio said:Arne has to tow the line on this one, so don't expect anything new from him.
There was a magazine article a while back that had the failure rate at, I think it was 40%.
It seems that they'd rather put money in customer support and deal quickly with the faulty ones, than fix the actual hardware.EphemeralDream said:Despite doing a near 180 in image and mindshare since the original Xbox, MS really foiled greater success with the failure rate of the 360. Sony has managed to end the negative image in hardware quality with the PS3, but so many people were skeptical of the quality at launch. This issue will be in the shadow of MS for years to come, especially with their seemingly apathetic stance towards fixing the hardware.
When consumers are skeptical to jump in based on hardware quality, that is a major problem that needs to be faced. Why such a long wait?
EphemeralDream said:Despite doing a near 180 in image and mindshare since the original Xbox, MS really foiled greater success with the failure rate of the 360. Sony has managed to end the negative image in hardware quality with the PS3, but so many people were skeptical of the quality at launch. This issue will be in the shadow of MS for years to come, especially with their seemingly apathetic stance towards fixing the hardware.
When consumers are skeptical to jump in based on hardware quality, that is a major problem that needs to be faced. Why such a long wait?
Tieno said:Yeah, that's what I don't get. While Sony ****ed up their numbers on the PS3 and made it too expensive of a deal, MS ****ed up their numbers too by lowballing the manufactering costs.
chibcicylist said:I hope both Sony and them crush each other to a pulp.
lol well played.NekoFever said:They treated me great. In fact they were kind enough to charge £83 ($165) for the repairs which I was totally responsible for. I mean if I hadn't played the thing it'd be fine.
YYZ said:3-5%
it's ok since it's in the acceptable range?
Speevy said:My console was replaced in a very timely manner. It took a little time to get those MS Points back, though.
NinSoX said:Gotta have some negative 360 news after the consistent positives I guess:lol
Gek54 said:I guess I am the only one who had good experience with getting my console replaced. I bought the extra 2 year coverage and then found out it was effectively moved to 3 years after the new basic coverage change. Spoke to a very pleasant American accented CR for about 5 minutes and was able to get a box, ship it off and have it returned all with in 10 days.
I bought a PS2 in late 2002 so I'm not sure how bad the failure rate was on early units but I don't think it was this high. More importantly the circumstances are a bit different this time around. PS2 was $200 or less by this point in the lifecycle, no DRM issues to worry about, and many of the issues didn't render the console completely useless. DREs on a few games could be worked around (I won't play those games mentality), but RRoD is completely unavoidable.BenjaminBirdie said:Didn't the PS2, pre-PS3's rescuing of Sony's rep in this matter, sell 100,000,000 units?
Based on my experience, this could easily be true. But maybe they're really having different rates in different countries. I run an xbox fansite in italy, and pretty every regular user in our forum had its console replaced by microsoft, some even two or three times.Vrolokus said:There is no way it's 40%, that's totally absurd.
Yes, they did the same with me last month when I sent them my second broken console.tracky_dacks said:MS fixed it no problems, at no cost, and even threw in a months subscription to Xbox Live Gold
Y2Kevbug11 said:The failure rates are pretty sad. Mine is still going strong, but my friends' conked out.
Spider_Jerusalem said:Based on my experience, this could easily be true. But maybe they're really having different rates in different countries. I run an xbox fansite in italy, and pretty every regular user in our forum had its console replaced by microsoft, some even two or three times.
NinSoX said:Gotta have some negative 360 news after the consistent positives I guess:lol
butthole fishhookingurk said:Yes, but how were they treated?