They should make it so you always pay the lowest price.
Start off by picking and choosing a game, and just play for as long as you like. If you play for an hour, you pay for an hour. If you play a few different games and the overall cost gets to be $20, then it caps the cost at $20 and gives you full access to the catalog like a subscription would.
Will they ever extend Gaikai to things we already own on the PS3?
Wow. So SONY's promised answer to providing a backwards compatibility option is to market a subscription service to some nebulous demographic that never played PS3 and charge money for it.
And people are okay with this.
Okay...
Okay wow people are bitching about the price when it's basically Gamefly prices with zero waiting and 100+ games at your finger tips instead of one at a time. I'm convinced there is no reasonable price point Sony could possibly strike without massive whining.
I'm guessing that if you access this from the UK there are going to be issues? Has anyone tried?
It'll be £19.99.
Will they ever extend Gaikai to things we already own on the PS3?
what has zero shopping savvy to do with this?
Is there another way to stream PS3/2/1 games to my Vita and PS4? Am I missing something?
I'm guessing that if you access this from the UK there are going to be issues? Has anyone tried?
It'll be £19.99.
What about the prices for one game at a time,like it is now...will those change? any news on that..?
If it was something 3dollar/ month if you own plus, 10 else..
I might have bited, if anything to support it since i own every game i want pretty much..
But 20/month? On top of psplus?
Cmon...
Well also offer a free seven-day trial to the subscription program when it launches. (1/13/15)
How is it gross?It's pretty gross. Luckily it's going to continue to be a colossal failure for the time being.
Wow. So SONY's promised answer to providing a backwards compatibility option is to market a subscription service to some nebulous demographic that never played PS3 and charge money for it.
And people are okay with this.
Okay...
20 a month seems fair as fuck to me.
It's pretty gross. Luckily it's going to continue to be a colossal failure for the time being.
Man that's really a small game selection, +100 is not a lot.
Oh, ok, then I stand corrected. I imagined "100+" to mean 110 > x > 100, heh.209 exactly and they going to add more with time.
For those who don't want to spend the money, but still want to find out if game streaming would even work well on their PS4s based on their internet connection.
Wow. So SONY's promised answer to providing a backwards compatibility option is to market a subscription service to some nebulous demographic that never played PS3 and charge money for it.
And people are okay with this.
Okay...
This really needs to come with a significant discount for PS+ users. I can't see it getting market saturation as successfully otherwise.
A PS3, and shopping savvy.
Seriously. 20 bucks and you get access to a ton of shit for a month.
And it is only gonna get better with time. People bitched about ps plus and that turned out amazing. I'll give Sony the benefit of the doubt.
nebulous demographic that never played PS3
This is a great deal. Just think, the service has 100+ games now and it will only improve. When they add PS2 and PS1 games then it will will only get even better.
Could you please link me to a Vita playable version of Last of Us in Denmark for less then 19.99?
Deadly Premonition is fine too.
Maybe your shopping savvy can help me out, since apparently I don't have any.