Always running away."A snake in the grass" ok this is the point where I exit the thread as I can see where this is going.
Always running away."A snake in the grass" ok this is the point where I exit the thread as I can see where this is going.
What a strange turn of the discussion in this thread.
Protests = Good
Violent Protests = Not Good
Is this not in agreement here?
All I've got to say: A riot is the language of the unheard.
"A snake in the grass" ok this is the point where I exit the thread as I can see where this is going.
So what is your solution to this issue right now?
Organised and targeted violent campaigns?
Do you feel that the other side will be vindicated in doing so should the tide turn again?
What a strange turn of the discussion in this thread.
Protests = Good
Violent Protests = Not Good
Is this not in agreement here?
I am not clicking my tongue at being disgusted by him, I am saying that violence isn't the answer.
Depends. You understand that, right? Sometimes violence is needed.
Depends. You understand that, right? Sometimes violence is needed.
When I said "NeoGaf condones this" I don't mean individuals, I meant moderators. If I refer to the users, I usually specificy a rough quantity (e.g a few users, many users etc.).
Do you believe that applies to all sides of the spectrum?
That if someone feels strongly enough about something or has anger, they should be encouraged to lash out?
Can we clarify who or what be targeted, and in what scenarios?
Violence is not inherently bad if it is used for just purposes, just like being peaceful is not inherently good if it leads to evil results.
Let's say your government starts mass incarceration without due process. Time for violent resistance.
"A snake in the grass" ok this is the point where I exit the thread as I can see where this is going.
Do you believe that applies to all sides of the spectrum?
That if someone feels strongly enough about something or has anger, they should be encouraged to lash out?
Can we clarify who or what be targeted, and in what scenarios?
Edit: I probably came in a bit strong there, but I'm struggling to see where we can condone violence in respect to today's events - as disgusting as it is.
I actually don't know if the mods condone my post or not, I could still catch a ban for advocating violence against Nazis. Admittedly, it was a bit of an outburst as well, and I'm not an expert in antifascist tactics and when/how exactly one should employ violence.
I'm just sick of the high-minded "violence is never ever ever the answer" rhetoric and I'm just not capable of believing or agreeing with it anymore. When I see a Nazis fuckhead like Spencer get bloodied, I cheer.
Someone apparently punched out Richard Spencer at a protest.
https://twitter.com/sleavenworth/status/822583488167735297?p=v
Animals rhetoric? We are human beings, we have brains, we are capable of engaging in debate and discussions and being empathic and kind to others, some of us less so than others but the point stands.
There are ways to deal with situations without resorting to violence, the difference between us and animals is we know when violence is appropriate, animals often resort to violence because they are acting upon instinct rather than thought.
That's my point, don't make it something it isn't.
RIOTS
I wish someone could dig up that long post by some member (can't remember the name, I think he could have been german though) who was a former black bloc/anarchist member and gave a great rundown on things.
Those rioters, the ones that dress completely in black, hide their faces, throw rocks at police and burn down shops, are deplorable. Most of them probably aren't even interested / don't even have a main purpose of doing this other than "against the system" and fucking shit up. Most of those are not desperate minorities who found no other outlet but from what I've seen in the footage it seems to be mostly young whites which again points to anarchists. By defending them you are defending anarchist assholes that just want to destroy things which at the same time has the consequence of painting all the peaceful protestors in a negative light and drawing media attention away. Don't be misguided.
What a strange turn of the discussion in this thread.
Protests = Good
Violent Protests = Not Good
Is this not in agreement here?
I wish someone could dig up that long post by some member (can't remember the name, I think he could have been german though) who was a former black bloc/anarchist member and gave a great rundown on things.
Those rioters, the ones that dress completely in black, hide their faces, throw rocks at police and burn down shops, are deplorable. Most of them probably aren't even interested / don't even have a main purpose of doing this other than "against the system" and fucking shit up. Most of those are not desperate minorities who found no other outlet but from what I've seen in the footage it seems to be mostly young whites which again points to anarchists. By defending them you are defending anarchist assholes that just want to destroy things which at the same time has the consequence of painting all the peaceful protestors in a negative light and drawing media attention away. Don't be misguided.
RIOTS
RIOTS
Fucking lol, of course. We all know that a smashed window or a burning bin with get more media coverage than a peaceful march, unfortunately.
Bwahahahahaha. That dude on the far right cracks me up.
Fucking lol, of course. We all know that a smashed window or a burning bin with get more media coverage than a peaceful march, unfortunately.
Violence can be just for a just cause. This shouldn't be difficult to understand.
How do you know what the answer is? You sure haven't provided any.
You just want people to sit still and be quiet because violent protest upsets your personal worldview that doesn't jive with history.
And then on TOP of that, you're a fucking Brexiter, too?
If white people expressed even a 10th of the concern they show to objects getting destroyed as they do black people being murdered there wouldn't be riots.
RIOTS
If white people expressed even a 10th of the concern they show to objects getting destroyed as they do black people being murdered there wouldn't be riots.
it's hilarious how small the fucking flame is too goddamn.
YEA MAN I GOT SOME PULITZER WINNING WORK RIGHT HERE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-kdHk742xE
Richard Spencer getting punched in the face on video now.
Fucking lol, of course. We all know that a smashed window or a burning bin with get more media coverage than a peaceful march, unfortunately.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-kdHk742xE
Richard Spencer getting punched in the face on video now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-kdHk742xE
Richard Spencer getting punched in the face on video now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-kdHk742xE
Richard Spencer getting punched in the face on video now.
More coverage than the police pepper spraying an elderly woman, a man on crutches, and those trying to help them get out of the way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-kdHk742xE
Richard Spencer getting punched in the face on video now.
This is extremely good.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-kdHk742xE
Richard Spencer getting punched in the face on video now.
This is the truth and it's also unfortunately why people in this very thread advocate for violence. The cameras aren't there otherwise because nobody gives a shit. It's not news.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-kdHk742xE
Richard Spencer getting punched in the face on video now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-kdHk742xE
Richard Spencer getting punched in the face on video now.
Animals rhetoric? We are human beings, we have brains, we are capable of engaging in debate and discussions and being empathic and kind to others, some of us less so than others but the point stands.
There are ways to deal with situations without resorting to violence, the difference between us and animals is we know when violence is appropriate, animals often resort to violence because they are acting upon instinct rather than thought.
That's my point, don't make it something it isn't.