valkillmore
Member
Oof, that is some brand dilution if true...
That was my thought too
Oof, that is some brand dilution if true...
At the price, it's not inconceivable that it could be a MS branded Intel stick running Windows 10 with the Xbox BPM mode they were talking about. That'd be a huge step up from Chromecast since you'd be able to run native windows apps. Probably a stretch though with MS focusing so heavily on UWAs.Double the price of chromecast :-( I hope they can justify the price difference with some killer features
I think if people think of Xbox not as a device but as a brand and platform like Android, it will be easier to understand where they are going
I think if people think of Xbox not as a device but as a brand and platform like Android, it will be easier to understand where they are going
If MS are opting to release more powerful hardware spring next year they can take huge advantage and get well ahead in performance. The question will the audience buy? I'm certainly interested..
If the rumors are true in that kotaku article and it will support oculus rift, it needs to be really powerful.
A streaming-only box needs to be cheaper than $99 unless there's more to it.
This iterative future is confusing. So after XBox 1.5, we'll see Xbox 2.0? And it will be backwards compatible? at what point will Xbox 1 not play future Xbox console games?
8. MS knows gaming is the "bread-and-butter" for Xbox and will show that at E3 but still want to "attack the living-room" and appeal to cord-cutters. Xbox One is currently too expensive/big for that audience.
Oh god, not this again.
.
3. Second Xbox streaming device (~$150 -> ~$175): a bit bigger than the chromecast-like device but "not an Xbox One crammed into a tiny box". This is more of a replacement for those who would buy 360 as a media box in 2015. He thinks this device will leverage the Windows Store to play "lightweight" games. Things like Hitman: Go rather than Rise of the Tomb Raider.
They never actually did "Tv, Tv, Tv" at E3, though.
To me, MS sounds totally confused and clueless. They are making Xbox even harder to understand or relate to with all these devices IMO. I don't even understand which one an enthusiast like me would pick or why.
PS4 and PS4K sound much more straightforward of a marketing strategy.
I do like the idea of playing Xbox games on PC, though, so I don't have to buy another console whenever it gets a game I'm interested in.
Bold strategy by Microsoft. I don't think they can go back to the old model if this doesn't work out.
Yeah, these are just leveraging the Xbox name as an entertainment brand instead of being Xboxes, similar to how the Kindle Fire TV is not an e-Reader.
Just what they need. Water out the Xbox brand.
Can't wait for these devices to not be relevant in Europe.
Why? I'm puzzled at the business decisions here. It appears they may be making the same mistake here as they did with the mobile phones.
Oh boy
The 2017 Xbox, which is codenamed Scorpio, will have a more powerful GPU, according to three people familiar with this model, speaking anonymously because they were not authorized to speak about Microsofts plans. We hear that it will also be technically capable of supporting the Oculus Rift and that Microsoft is pursuing a partnership with Oculus. As for 2016, sources have told us theres at least a more compact version coming by years end. One source believed it will include a larger 2TB hard drive, double the capacity of the most spacious current model. Were expecting Microsoft to announce the more compact machine at E3 next month. (Kotakus Jason Schreier and Kotaku UKs Keza MacDonald both independently corroborated this information.)
http://kotaku.com/sources-smaller-xbox-one-coming-this-year-more-powerf-1778634446
Hope soSounds like it. Definitely the right move.
The "chromecast" and "lunchbox" systems to try and reclaim the living room sound like terrible ideas as that market is already flooded and Smart TVs are the way more people consumer their digital content. No reason to build and sell a separate box for the living room. It'll be DOA.
The "chromecast" and "lunchbox" systems to try and reclaim the living room sound like terrible ideas as that market is already flooded and Smart TVs are the way more people consumer their digital content. No reason to build and sell a separate box for the living room. It'll be DOA.
Because nobody has Chromecasts and Roku boxes right?
I'd probably get one depending on a few things and I have a smart TV.