EdibleKnife
Member
I've stopped consciously reading hashtags a while ago because they're usually fluff.
Sometimes, that's where the fucked up gold is
I've stopped consciously reading hashtags a while ago because they're usually fluff.
Officers can go without guns in the UK because the population doesn't have ludicrously easy access to weaponry.
There are plenty of weapons in the hands of criminals here though. I'd argue it's a tougher job to police the UK.
They get that privilege because the population doesn't have ludicrously easy access to weaponry.
There are plenty of weapons in the hands of criminals here though.
i'm sure the isis types love the fact that most of the cops they would encounter are disarmed.
>_>i'm sure the isis types love the fact that most of the cops they would encounter are disarmed.
In that situation you're calling in SWAT regardless of what country you're in.i'm sure the isis types love the fact that most of the cops they would encounter are disarmed.
I see tons of new recruits that only want to hunt and hurt. I see veteran officers who harass poor people all day to further their career. There's definitely a problem.He does have a point but probably the wrong day to make it. I'm not saying there isn't racist UK police officers, but they certainly give off a different attitude when you have dealings with them. It points to deep flaws at the recruiting and training stages.
STOP RESISTING!
That's cool but I'm confused on what you're disputing in my quote then.
AR-15 has somehow become synonymous with the word rifle. It's also the rifle that's been targeted as the "most dangerous" for whatever fucking reason and so that's the only gun anyone references anymore.
I see tons of new recruits that only want to hunt and hurt. I see veteran officers who harass poor people all day to further their career. There's definitely a problem.
Our Academy is 13 weeks. Then FTO for 10.How long is the common police training in the US?
I apologize for the slight derail, but does anyone have an article about this?STOP RESISTING!
Aimed at the torso too. Fucked up.So many shots after his hands were up too... "You dove headfirst", if that's a dive then my 80 year grandpa could have dove harder than that.
I apologize for the slight derail, but does anyone have an article about this?
Aimed at the torso too. Fucked up.
I apologize for the slight derail, but does anyone have an article about this?
STOP RESISTING!
I guess since it wasn't vital the adrenaline masked some of the pain. Kind of like that one civilian lady who got hit in the Dallas shooting. Her friend said the first thing she did was secure her children and only really noticed she got hit in the leg afterwards.Can't believe the guy who was shot took it so calmly.
What ever ended up happening with this case?
I guess since it wasn't vital the adrenaline masked some of the pain. Kind of like that one civilian lady who got hit in the Dallas shooting. Her friend said the first thing she did was secure her children and only really noticed she got hit in the leg afterwards.
On a semi-related note, this general trigger happiness seems completely insane from this side of the globe. I remember an incident on our version of COPS where they saw someone being publicly intoxicated and when they approached him the drunk guy jokingly mimicked a pistol with his hands, shouted "Pull!" and the coppers just laughed and took him to the drunk tank. Seems like that guy would've been nuked in the States.
I've been around GAF for a while now.
This is, hands down and without compare, the worst thing I've ever read on this forum. This makes me sick to read, and this kind of thought process is on the same level of toxin that the far-right extremists use.
I'm done here.
It's in the link above . All the deputies seem to have been punished and resigned with one facing up to 10 years in prison
Oh dear David. This is why you shouldn't tweet after a 'day out' at Wimbledon.
He does have a point but probably the wrong day to make it. I'm not saying there isn't racist UK police officers, but they certainly give off a different attitude when you have dealings with them. It points to deep flaws at the recruiting and training stages.
I agree minorities really can't participate in institutional racism in the United States because there is no inherent power here. However, individual acts can be racist by anyone.No, racism is about the perpetuation of white supremacy. A black person can not engage in racism*** because they do not have the institutional power of white supremacy behind them. While Micah Johnson's actions were designed to attack a group of people beyond the ones he personally killed via fear and intimidation, these killings are not a part of a systematic violent oppression of whites because no such system exists.
The rebranding of anti-white rhetoric and violence by black radicals as "racism" is a right-wing tactic designed to dilute the meaning of the word. These killings were not hate crimes. They were not a part of a pattern of genocidal actions. They were 'just' murder. Perhaps terrorism.
***Johnson was no doubt prejudiced and discriminatory. But that's not the same as racism.
Poor guy. Shouldn't have followed the cop's order to get his licence and, most importantly, not resist!Well seems like something did nerve damage too since he said he lost feeling in his legs which probably helped.
Nah, it's Germany, so you can check where civilian gun ownership is on that chart above. I'd assume they'd be less relaxed if our guns weren't strictly regulated too, but luckily they are. Police are only allowed to use their guns as a last resort too and whenever they fire even a single shot, an officer from internal affairs is sent to the scene to investigate how justified it was.Are you allowed to carry guns in your country though? I would think you're a lot more relaxed when guns aren't that common so it would be really rare to have someone actually carrying a pistol.
It's what the Dallas police chief Brown quoted the shooter saying.Source?
Poor guy. Shouldn't have followed the cop's order to get his licence and, most importantly, not resist!
Nah, it's Germany, so you can check where civilian gun ownership is on that chart above. I'd assume they'd be less relaxed if our guns weren't strictly regulated too, but luckily they are. Police are only allowed to use their guns as a last resort too and whenever they fire even a single shot, an officer from internal affairs is sent to the scene to investigate how justified it was.
It's what the Dallas police chief Brown quoted the shooter saying.
edit: screw it
I guess since it wasn't vital the adrenaline masked some of the pain. Kind of like that one civilian lady who got hit in the Dallas shooting. Her friend said the first thing she did was secure her children and only really noticed she got hit in the leg afterwards.
On a semi-related note, this general trigger happiness seems completely insane from this side of the globe. I remember an incident on our version of COPS where they saw someone being publicly intoxicated and when they approached him the drunk guy jokingly mimicked a pistol with his hands, shouted "Pull!" and the coppers just laughed and took him to the drunk tank. Seems like that guy would've been nuked in the States.
It sort of feels like people that insist on calling him racist are trying to keep score. Like they've been losing the racism battle and this is how they can finally get on the scoreboard. Sure, it fits a technical definition of racism but it's clearly different and it conflates itself with the larger issues in a way that muddies the discussion.
Yeah, that's from the article. "Kill" was the actual word, but the best way to get Brown's statements completely unfiltered would be to watch the DPD's archive of that press conference, if you want:The "exterminate" word used wasn't used by the police chief as far as I know, but I won't bother arguing over this.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...s-beating-non-violent-man-during-2014-n506176
"are you hit?"
Motherfucker you were shooting him in the chest from like 2 feet away. Can't believe the guy who was shot took it so calmly.
The acquittal
Jesse Terrell is a free man.
In the surveillance video, Terrell can be seen punching or kicking Price’s head more than 20 times. He took his case to trial, and an all-white jury of four men and eight women on April 8 found him not guilty of a civil rights violation. Theirs was a unanimous decision.
It sort of feels like people that insist on calling him racist are trying to keep score. Like they've been losing the racism battle and this is how they can finally get on the scoreboard. Sure, it fits a technical definition of racism but it's clearly different and it conflates itself with the larger issues in a way that muddies the discussion.
...that minorities can't possibly be racist because they are not in a position of power? Yeah, that is definitely a point worth dismissing.
Wait, what's so bad about that tweet?
Edit: Never mind, I overlooked the hashtag. Oh well!
Yeah I don't think this would be an issue if that were the case.Or maybe people understand the difference of racism in an individual or an individual act versus institutional racism in society at large.
Well the guy said he wanted to kill white people, sounds pretty racist to me, and people were calling it a terrorist attack all that night on several news stations while it was going on. Not in an international type of way, but in a "this is terrifying" type of way. (No one was implying Isis or muslims or anything like that like they usually do in these type of events)So, basically...
- shooting in San Bernardino = terrorism
- shooting in Orlando = terrorism
- shooting in numerous schools/universities = mental health
- shooting in army barracks = mental health
- shooting of multiple black guys by police = racism
- shooting of white guy by police = trigger-happyism
- shooting in Dallas = racially motivated?/militantism?/mental health? etc?
I can't help feeling that the words on the right of that list, are somewhat less important than one word on the left.
These sentiments were released during the Dallas press conferences. Sorry he stated: he was upset and wanted to kill whites. Specifically white officers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/09/us/dallas-police-shooting.html?_r=0
Edit: He used the word kill, not exterminate. But they're basically synonyms of course.
It's not clear that this can be labeled a racist attack.
Yeah, page 1 of this thread and start going through the pages, there is probably some useful links in this very thread.Does anyone know where I can find a news archive from when it all broke?
Don't want to elaborate too much on this, but this guy is former military, so you could frame his desire to "kill white officers" as a revenge attack on those he considered enemies as a result of them having killed black people. It's not clear that this can be labeled a racist attack.
His statement was basically that because white police officers killed black innocent people, he would now target them. That's pretty far from "wanted to exterminate white people".
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/affN2mI.jpg[/IMG]
I wonder if this is the incident that forces America to confront its racism problems.
Don't want to elaborate too much on this, but this guy is former military, so you could frame his desire to "kill white officers" as a revenge attack on those he considered enemies as a result of them having killed black people. It's not clear that this can be labeled a racist attack.
His statement was basically that because white police officers killed black innocent people, he would now target them. That's pretty far from "wanted to exterminate white people".
The suspect said he was upset at white people. The suspect stated he wanted to kill white people, especially white officers."
lol @ people calling this a racist attack. It's racist if White Cops Who Abuse Black Folk is now a race.
(I don't think this is a racist attack but an attach with racial motivation)
Don't want to elaborate too much on this, but this guy is former military, so you could frame his desire to "kill white officers" as a revenge attack on those he considered enemies as a result of them having killed black people. It's not clear that this can be labeled a racist attack.
His statement was basically that because white police officers killed black innocent people, he would now target them. That's pretty far from "wanted to exterminate white people".