Gamesradar 4/5:
http://www.gamesradar.com/witcher-3-wild-hunt-review/
http://www.gamesradar.com/witcher-3-wild-hunt-review/
That IGN review doesn't match the score they gave it. It's just i as I thought, 100 hours with loads of padding and meaningless fetch quests, exactly the same as dragon Age Inquisition. The first paragraph was about how huge the open world was.. Same as da:I. Combine this with the shitty UI and inventory system means it's not a purchase for me.
That IGN review doesn't match the score they gave it. It's just i as I thought, 100 hours with loads of padding and meaningless fetch quests, exactly the same as dragon Age Inquisition. The first paragraph was about how huge the open world was.. Same as da:I. Combine this with the shitty UI and inventory system means it's not a purchase for me.
So include Witcher 3 in the Game of the Year list with Bloodborne and Xenoblade right now.
One curious question, I've had the game pre-ordered for close to a year, I'm kind of hopping into this completely blind and I haven't played the first two Witcher games despite owning them forever on Steam. Should I try to play some of those games before Witcher 3, or think I should just dive right into it?
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt isnt perfect (yet?), but its one of the best written RPG ever.
That IGN review doesn't match the score they gave it. It's just i as I thought, 100 hours with loads of padding and meaningless fetch quests, exactly the same as dragon Age Inquisition. The first paragraph was about how huge the open world was.. Same as da:I. Combine this with the shitty UI and inventory system means it's not a purchase for me.
PC Gamer - No review copy due to lack of day one PC Patch: http://www.pcgamer.com/when-is-our-witcher-3-review-coming/
That IGN review doesn't match the score they gave it. It's just i as I thought, 100 hours with loads of padding and meaningless fetch quests, exactly the same as dragon Age Inquisition. The first paragraph was about how huge the open world was.. Same as da:I. Combine this with the shitty UI and inventory system means it's not a purchase for me.
Damn, my PC won't probably run it and I most like won't get a ps4 until christmas.
That IGN review doesn't match the score they gave it. It's just i as I thought, 100 hours with loads of padding and meaningless fetch quests, exactly the same as dragon Age Inquisition. The first paragraph was about how huge the open world was.. Same as da:I. Combine this with the shitty UI and inventory system means it's not a purchase for me.
Hmm, slightly worrying.
Is that not the highest score GT has ever given? :O
Hmm, slightly worrying.
Thanks to lots of excellent dialogue and voice acting there is some emotional payoff along the way, but its mixed in with too much padding in the form of meaningless fetch quests and collectathons. Every time I felt like I was on the verge of an interesting revelation, Id have to suddenly stop to escort a goat, or search for a lost, narcoleptic dwarf. Heck, even Geralt can barely hide his frustration with the constant parade of menial tasks at times.
Hmm, slightly worrying.
Hmm, slightly worrying.
I knew the game would look awesome and have a good story and music. The last one did. But it was such a chore to play through and the combat and menu systems were awful. I hope they would have addressed this but it's clear they didn't.You seem to only be reading the negatives to reinforce the opinion you already had.
Kotaku also mentioned the framerate (on PS4). Heads up-
There is a day 1 patch.
Watching some of the video reviews and all the characters look like they are covered in a layer of grease?
Yup,dont get me wrong, I'm looking forward to this game. This just means I'm going to skip a shit load of stuff. What bugs me is that CDPR said there would be no fetch quests.AWESOME! but......
from IGN
You can grab a cheap 750 ti, they go on sale for ~$100 constantly and consistently outperform the PS4 in multiplatform games.
http://slickdeals.net/f/7849453-asu...gb-video-card-110ar-or-70-w-emailed-code-frys