unapersson
Member
So much truth in this post. I said something similar earlier in the thread too. The fact that there isn't a campaign on Twitter or on journalist web sites tells me two things:
1) Xbox fans aren't as passionate about anti-consumer stuff as other fanbases (which is really not a good thing).
2) Other fanbases don't give a shit about something being anti-consumer in general - the only thing that matters is whether or not the game is coming to their console of choice.
Which could explain why the passion against Rise's deal is nowhere to be found with Crash. The people who cried about Rise don't necessarily care if something is anti-consumer - they just wanted the game on their platform.
So because of this it looks like Sony is going to get a huuuuuuge pass on these shenanigans. Crash is a de facto secret timed exclusive and no one is going to make any noise about it. The blame falls on both sides I guess. The hypocrites on one end and the Xbox fanbase on the other end.
I'm not seeing how Sony persuading Acitvision to create new remakes old Playstation classics is somehow anti-consumer. It's not as if Activision have been doing much with Crash over the last five years.
I see it more as Activision raising a trial balloon and taking advantage of Playstation nostalgia and it seems to have worked. They still had the option of a muitiplatform release if it was a big success, and could quietly forget it if it flopped. Taking this approach it's gone about as well as it could have done, Crash is a topic of conversation and an IP they can do something with again.
A single platform release is a valid tactic, especially where the game has close associations with that platform, and a pretty good way to revive an IP. We've certainly moved on from the days where no one liked it as it was never any good.