• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

What do you think of the people who use the pejorative "SJW?"

Calabi

Member
Basically, using the term outs you as an idiot.

The term "social justice warrior" contains zero insulting connotations. Divorced from context, for a moment, wouldn't you want to be a social justice warrior? Wouldn't Martin Luther King and Susan B Anthony be social justice warriors? The name is even badass. Like, I am a fucking warrior for social justice.

So for somebody to have a frame of mind where the term is insulting, they have to believe one of two things:

1) There is no social injustice and the SJW is making a fool of themselves because the thing they are frEaJKiNG OUut about doesn't even exist.

2) Social injustice doesn't matter because those people don't matter and you're a stupid SJW for caring about people who don't matter.

There absolutely is a left bubble where surface-level identity politics derail and dominate conversations. This was (is? definitely not so much) a massive problem on early Tumblr. And yeah, it is kind of funny to make fun of people who have conversations like this:



These people are living caricatures of legitimate social justice champions. They are the people that "SJW" was originally meant to mock. Self-important, super-sensitive, and group-thinky.

But it is 2017 now and the term is absolutely and positively never used to describe these irrelevant people and if you call somebody an SJW you are an idiot.

This is how group think works now. Its how you manipulate minds, you manipulate and co-opt the words to mean what you want them to mean.
 

Loxley

Member
I just assume they're alt-right neckbeards :p

"SJW" is straight-up the lamest attempt at an insult I can think of in recent memory. Seriously, what exactly about that term am I, as a liberal, supposed to find offensive or be insulted by? I get that it was originally meant as a sarcastic term to refer to the fringe, hard-left people who were seemingly insulted by everything, but as others have said - now it's just a term used by right-wingers to refer to any left-wing person (often millenials) who dare speak up about women, POC or LBGT rights.
 
It is exactly like the same people who use the term snowflake. Of course as it was found out once she was fired, Tomi Lahren IS a snowflake.
 

hotcyder

Member
With regards to h3h3, they are masters of walking the kind of tightrope where they make great videos about shitty kickstarters, instagram models, prank channels so people won't unsubscribe, meanwhile do a "lol SJW feminazi" video every now and then to cater to ... you know ... that crowd, which is a big money maker on Youtube. It's smart business, sadly.

On that tangent;

Is it just me or does anyone get the feeling that the only reason Ethan has his girlfriend in most of his "lol feminazi" videos is as some sort of defence mechanism against criticism of his shitty views towards women?
 

Alienfan

Member
I find it hilarious that people use it as an insult. Social justice is a good thing, Warrior means brave fighter. What should I be offended about. It says more about the person using it that they think they're insulting me.
 
I just assume they're alt-right neckbeards :p

"SJW" is straight-up the lamest attempt at an insult I can think of in recent memory. Seriously, what exactly about that term am I, as a liberal, supposed to find offensive or be insulted by? I get that it was originally meant as a sarcastic term to refer to the fringe, hard-left people who were seemingly insulted by everything, but as others have said - now it's just a term used by right-wingers to refer to any left-wing person (often millenials) who dare speak up about women, POC or LBGT rights.

Yep. Which frustratingly I find also makes it harder to explain why the term really isn't something a person should want to use seriously, because even if accepting a person means it in the 'original' sense, most usage does not reflect that, so holding to that meaning is to willingly allow one's self to be duped. It's like trying to stick to 'queer' as meaning 'strange'; sure it may be valid in that sense, but most of the world isn't operating on that logic anymore.

Edit:
On that tangent;

Is it just me or does anyone get the feeling that the only reason Ethan has his girlfriend in the videos is as some sort of defence mechanism against criticism of his shitty views towards women?

Honestly it's a basic but subtle tactic a lot of online personalities use. See also: The 'bring your cute pet into the camera so you can show them your affection as you apologise' tactic.
 

Steel

Banned
I find it hilarious that people use it as an insult. Social justice is a good thing, Warrior means brave fighter. What should I be offended about. It says more about the person using it that they think they're insulting me.

Nah, when SJW is used as a positive it's cheesy as fuck. I roll my eyes when anyone uses it. Not that the two uses are equivalent.
 

KSweeley

Member
My main issue with people using "social justice" as a pejorative term is how the heck is it a bad thing to support social justice????

I find it to be a very good thing to support social justice because it would greatly advance society if everyone is equal in all areas which is one of the major goals of social justice.
 

Alienous

Member
I find it hilarious that people use it as an insult. Social justice is a good thing, Warrior means brave fighter. What should I be offended about. It says more about the person using it that they think they're insulting me.

It's supposed to be sarcastic, sort-of. Like "Oh look, we have a badass over here". "Oh look, it's someone fighting for what they think is social justice".

So its intention as an insult is pretty solid.
 

Dishwalla

Banned
I think it's a dumb attempt to brush off an argument with a pithy insult. Honestly being called an "sjw" doesn't bother me, continue calling me it if you must.
 
It's pretty much a useless term that nowadays is thrown at anyone who openly supports LGBT or feminism to any degree. I mean even the trailer for that Louis CK documentary about the black LGBT gang has comments calling him an SJW just for helping to tell a story. At that level, the word is so toxic that there is no longer any context in which anyone can even discuss the LGBT community without someone calling them an SJW. Those people have got themselves into such a fucked up mindset that any support of anything not straight & white makes them instantly judge and label that person, actively making the friends of gay and trans people an enemy by default. I understand that not everybody uses the term in that way, and some use it for extreme cases like the woman screaming in anger at a taxi driver for having a hula girl bobblehead, but it's so tainted why even bother? It's not like we're running out of adjectives.
 

hotcyder

Member
Honestly it's a basic but subtle tactic a lot of online personalities use. See also: The 'bring your cute pet into the camera so you can show them your affection as you apologise' tactic.

"Watch me feed a raft of fluffy penguin chicks while talking about why the wage gap doesn't exist for 15 minutes"
 

Alienfan

Member
On that tangent;

Is it just me or does anyone get the feeling that the only reason Ethan has his girlfriend in the videos is as some sort of defence mechanism against criticism of his shitty views towards women?

Yep. Shows her saying things like "third wave feminism has ruined feminism" or other nonsense that he wishes he could say, he doesn't get any of the heat / branded as conservative. She's basically an extension mouth piece for him, she just repeats what he says but with a more conservative bend. It's a genius way of catering towards the right, while also not scaring his diet liberal audience away. He comes off as impartial and moderate, but he's really, really not.
 

RionaaM

Unconfirmed Member
They're probably an idiot harbouring some despicable views.

Haven't been wrong so far.
This. As soon as they use the term "SJW" I immediately know what their opinion on social issues is. It's a good way of quickly learning whose opinions I need not respect, at least when it comes to those topics.
 

HStallion

Now what's the next step in your master plan?
When someone unironically drops words like "SJW", "Cuck", "Fake News" etc. I instantly tend to start zoning out. Its like a safety response from my mind to back away even if I'm physically still there to limit the pain of hearing someone like that rant on and on. I also begin losing a huge amount of respect I had for that person as well.
 

RM8

Member
I mostly think "this is a native English speaker who doesn't like minorities being uppity". It literally means nothing, though, go into r/worldnews and post something like "black people aren't worse than white people" or "we don't solve anything by attacking all muslims" - thre you go, you too can be a SJW.
 
I automatically assume they are some sort of alt-right, misogynist, diet racist, Gamer Gate, Alex Jones fan, shit-posting 20-something-year-old over privileged edge lord who grew up in suburbia and and who is devoid of any culture or empathy.
 

KoopaTheCasual

Junior Member
SJW is not different from anything else. Like other terms, slogans and symbols it is co-opted by different groups. There is no unison on what it means. And that's not exclusive to SJW. That has pretty much been the par for course for any number of words that separate the left and the right. What does it mean, how do you use it, and how dare the other side think it means what I and my ilk think it should mean?

To some people SJW is a term used for preachy tumblr-esque idiots who are as embarrasment as their far-right manchild mirror image on reddit and 4chan. For others, it's just a term for standing out for decent values.

I can see the term being used in both ways. It's not that different from "liberal" or "feminist". I think I can be called both of those in an insulting or positive way, simply by the token of the sender.

It doesn't bother me, because a label is not who you are or what you stand for. Every label or symbol means different things to different people, so when someone calls you something, it's their own world view that is inflated on it.
I cannot decide if you think being called a feminist or a SJW or a liberal is more offensive or more positive. Incidently that is why I don't think it's a good idea to sum up your person or values in a term or symbol.
No. SJW is a pejorative. It always was a pejorative. It just used to be used to describe fringe left liberals, but now has been co-opted by the right wing to apply to most liberals, as a pejorative.

As for "consensus", just google SJW, and tell me what you find for a definitions from various sources. To claim it's not a pejorative and is a positive label is a poor man's attempt at "reclaiming the word"

Edit: Even better comparison: Try arguing that "white knighting" was ever positive. It's the same shit.
 
It has very little meaning any more because it's so overused. I would guess that like 99% of the people who use the term are dribbling morons who apply it to anything vaguely left or approaching equality.
 

Aurongel

Member
Even from the perspective of a right wing individual it makes no sense. No single part of the acronym is egregiously offensive or a pejorative. I've always been baffled that they didn't rally around a more incendiary or offensive term to describe those individuals.
 
No. SJW is a pejorative. It always was a pejorative. It just used to be used to describe fringe left liberals, but now has been co-opted by the right wing to apply to most liberals, as a pejorative.

As for "consensus", just google SJW, and tell me what you find for a definitions from various sources. To claim it's not a pejorative and is a positive label is a poor man's attempt at "reclaiming the word"

Edit: Even better comparison: Try arguing that "white knighting" was ever positive. It's the same shit.

I've been self identifying as one unironically. You'd be surprised at how many people that pisses off. It's definitely an easy word to reclaim.
 
People love to labor under the misconception that shaming people for having empathy makes them look wise and learned.

Easy, lazy cynicism as a means to feel briefly special by demeaning the very act, no matter how minor it might be, of daring to give a fuck about other people
 
It signals to me that they are either a garbage person or someone who is easily swayed by dimwitted rhetoric and has absolutely zero ability to do any research or form opinions of their own. In both cases I just tune them out completely because they have nothing of value to say.
 
No. SJW is a pejorative. It always was a pejorative. It just used to be used to describe fringe left liberals, but now has been co-opted by the right wing to apply to most liberals, as a pejorative.

As for "consensus", just google SJW, and tell me what you find for a definitions from various sources. To claim it's not a pejorative and is a positive label is a poor man's attempt at "reclaiming the word"

Edit: Even better comparison: Try arguing that "white knighting" was ever positive. It's the same shit.

Yep. It went from a soft but silly insult to being a serious pejorative (in the weirdest way possible), intended as immediately legitimising, presumably due to the old associations. Ie, it was accepted that 'SJWs' were fringe left idiots, ergo if it's applied to anyone on the left, they will be understood as fringe left idiots. Implication: Only the right remains a valid political stance.
 
My rule of thumb is that there's a 99.9% chance they're an asshole or are used to reading/watching/listening to assholes.

This rarely fails.

Other tells: "I prefer egalitarian to feminist", "cultural Marxism", "regressive left", "outrage/PC culture". They're all alt right talking points that the person is willingly or not parroting and propagating.
 

Dice//

Banned
If being called an SJW means I actually give a damn about the issues or other people's problems or the problems going on it then world, then it can only be good for my accolade. So no, I don't understand people using it ironically.
 

Rayis

Member
They're people with a worldview I entirely disagree with, whether they call themselves liberals or not.
 

chadtwo

Member
I actually think as a narrowly used label for people who present their socially progressive viewpoints in a way that borders on absurdity or hypocrisy, or is tinged with self-righteousness, it has applicability (yes, these people exist).

However, the term is almost exclusively used to delegitimize socially progressive ideals/thinkers per se, as if social justice itself were silly to talk about as valuable or important to consider.
 

H1PSTER

Member
Does this make me anti-sjw? I'd rather have equality but not at the expense of other things, nothing should ideally be seen as bad (unless it obviously is, I.E. national socialism) especially when it's at the cost of something that isn't against what said thing stands for to begin with.

If it does then so be it, I'd rather let everyone actually have an opinion than let someone suppress another's.

I've never actually used it as I think it's stupid
 

wamberz1

Member
As far as insults goes its a pretty badass one
"Social Justice Warrior" damn thanks for making me feel like a superhero
This is (partially) a joke and people who use it as an insult are idiots
 
Does this make me anti-sjw? I'd rather have equality but not at the expense of other things, nothing should ideally be seen as bad (unless it obviously is, I.E. national socialism) especially when it's at the cost of something that isn't against what said thing stands for to begin with.

If it does then so be it, I'd rather let everyone actually have an opinion than let someone suppress another's.

Do you think that simply expressing empathy for the plights of women or minorities is irrational? Because that's the baseline to be considered an SJW.
 

RinsFury

Member
Use of that lets me immediately know they have nothing of worth to say, and might as well be a flag saying they support bigotry, white supremacy, fascism, and every other hateful way of thinking that progressives on the left work to eradicate.
 
Tells me pretty much all I need to know about the individual: someone I needn't bother with.

Like PC, it's a lazy-ass catch-all term for "person/thing I don't like."

Basically, using the term outs you as an idiot.

The term "social justice warrior" contains zero insulting connotations. Divorced from context, for a moment, wouldn't you want to be a social justice warrior? Wouldn't Martin Luther King and Susan B Anthony be social justice warriors? The name is even badass. Like, I am a fucking warrior for social justice.

So for somebody to have a frame of mind where the term is insulting, they have to believe one of two things:

1) There is no social injustice and the SJW is making a fool of themselves because the thing they are frEaJKiNG OUut about doesn't even exist.

2) Social injustice doesn't matter because those people don't matter and you're a stupid SJW for caring about people who don't matter.

There absolutely is a left bubble where surface-level identity politics derail and dominate conversations. This was (is? definitely not so much) a massive problem on early Tumblr. And yeah, it is kind of funny to make fun of people who have conversations like this:



These people are living caricatures of legitimate social justice champions. They are the people that "SJW" was originally meant to mock. Self-important, super-sensitive, and group-thinky.

But it is 2017 now and the term is absolutely and positively never used to describe these irrelevant people and if you call somebody an SJW you are an idiot.

Nailed it.
 

Preacher

Member
I used to be around people who would constantly throw the term aroundisability but I tend to avoid those types nowadays. These people tend to hold really abhorrent views despite not being informed.

Most of these people were in these he gaming community which is why I tend to no longer post on most gaming forums. I don't want to deal with that toxicity on a weekly basis
 
Top Bottom