Phrozenflame500
Member
It's become a shortward for "anyone to the left of me", so I can't really take it too seriously.
Basically, using the term outs you as an idiot.
The term "social justice warrior" contains zero insulting connotations. Divorced from context, for a moment, wouldn't you want to be a social justice warrior? Wouldn't Martin Luther King and Susan B Anthony be social justice warriors? The name is even badass. Like, I am a fucking warrior for social justice.
So for somebody to have a frame of mind where the term is insulting, they have to believe one of two things:
1) There is no social injustice and the SJW is making a fool of themselves because the thing they are frEaJKiNG OUut about doesn't even exist.
2) Social injustice doesn't matter because those people don't matter and you're a stupid SJW for caring about people who don't matter.
There absolutely is a left bubble where surface-level identity politics derail and dominate conversations. This was (is? definitely not so much) a massive problem on early Tumblr. And yeah, it is kind of funny to make fun of people who have conversations like this:
These people are living caricatures of legitimate social justice champions. They are the people that "SJW" was originally meant to mock. Self-important, super-sensitive, and group-thinky.
But it is 2017 now and the term is absolutely and positively never used to describe these irrelevant people and if you call somebody an SJW you are an idiot.
What about people who use Pepe?
With regards to h3h3, they are masters of walking the kind of tightrope where they make great videos about shitty kickstarters, instagram models, prank channels so people won't unsubscribe, meanwhile do a "lol SJW feminazi" video every now and then to cater to ... you know ... that crowd, which is a big money maker on Youtube. It's smart business, sadly.
I just assume they're alt-right neckbeards
"SJW" is straight-up the lamest attempt at an insult I can think of in recent memory. Seriously, what exactly about that term am I, as a liberal, supposed to find offensive or be insulted by? I get that it was originally meant as a sarcastic term to refer to the fringe, hard-left people who were seemingly insulted by everything, but as others have said - now it's just a term used by right-wingers to refer to any left-wing person (often millenials) who dare speak up about women, POC or LBGT rights.
On that tangent;
Is it just me or does anyone get the feeling that the only reason Ethan has his girlfriend in the videos is as some sort of defence mechanism against criticism of his shitty views towards women?
I find it hilarious that people use it as an insult. Social justice is a good thing, Warrior means brave fighter. What should I be offended about. It says more about the person using it that they think they're insulting me.
I find it hilarious that people use it as an insult. Social justice is a good thing, Warrior means brave fighter. What should I be offended about. It says more about the person using it that they think they're insulting me.
Honestly it's a basic but subtle tactic a lot of online personalities use. See also: The 'bring your cute pet into the camera so you can show them your affection as you apologise' tactic.
On that tangent;
Is it just me or does anyone get the feeling that the only reason Ethan has his girlfriend in the videos is as some sort of defence mechanism against criticism of his shitty views towards women?
This. As soon as they use the term "SJW" I immediately know what their opinion on social issues is. It's a good way of quickly learning whose opinions I need not respect, at least when it comes to those topics.They're probably an idiot harbouring some despicable views.
Haven't been wrong so far.
No. SJW is a pejorative. It always was a pejorative. It just used to be used to describe fringe left liberals, but now has been co-opted by the right wing to apply to most liberals, as a pejorative.SJW is not different from anything else. Like other terms, slogans and symbols it is co-opted by different groups. There is no unison on what it means. And that's not exclusive to SJW. That has pretty much been the par for course for any number of words that separate the left and the right. What does it mean, how do you use it, and how dare the other side think it means what I and my ilk think it should mean?
To some people SJW is a term used for preachy tumblr-esque idiots who are as embarrasment as their far-right manchild mirror image on reddit and 4chan. For others, it's just a term for standing out for decent values.
I can see the term being used in both ways. It's not that different from "liberal" or "feminist". I think I can be called both of those in an insulting or positive way, simply by the token of the sender.
It doesn't bother me, because a label is not who you are or what you stand for. Every label or symbol means different things to different people, so when someone calls you something, it's their own world view that is inflated on it.
I cannot decide if you think being called a feminist or a SJW or a liberal is more offensive or more positive. Incidently that is why I don't think it's a good idea to sum up your person or values in a term or symbol.
No. SJW is a pejorative. It always was a pejorative. It just used to be used to describe fringe left liberals, but now has been co-opted by the right wing to apply to most liberals, as a pejorative.
As for "consensus", just google SJW, and tell me what you find for a definitions from various sources. To claim it's not a pejorative and is a positive label is a poor man's attempt at "reclaiming the word"
Edit: Even better comparison: Try arguing that "white knighting" was ever positive. It's the same shit.
I can immediately disregard anything they're saying.
No. SJW is a pejorative. It always was a pejorative. It just used to be used to describe fringe left liberals, but now has been co-opted by the right wing to apply to most liberals, as a pejorative.
As for "consensus", just google SJW, and tell me what you find for a definitions from various sources. To claim it's not a pejorative and is a positive label is a poor man's attempt at "reclaiming the word"
Edit: Even better comparison: Try arguing that "white knighting" was ever positive. It's the same shit.
Does this make me anti-sjw? I'd rather have equality but not at the expense of other things, nothing should ideally be seen as bad (unless it obviously is, I.E. national socialism) especially when it's at the cost of something that isn't against what said thing stands for to begin with.
If it does then so be it, I'd rather let everyone actually have an opinion than let someone suppress another's.
Basically, using the term outs you as an idiot.
The term "social justice warrior" contains zero insulting connotations. Divorced from context, for a moment, wouldn't you want to be a social justice warrior? Wouldn't Martin Luther King and Susan B Anthony be social justice warriors? The name is even badass. Like, I am a fucking warrior for social justice.
So for somebody to have a frame of mind where the term is insulting, they have to believe one of two things:
1) There is no social injustice and the SJW is making a fool of themselves because the thing they are frEaJKiNG OUut about doesn't even exist.
2) Social injustice doesn't matter because those people don't matter and you're a stupid SJW for caring about people who don't matter.
There absolutely is a left bubble where surface-level identity politics derail and dominate conversations. This was (is? definitely not so much) a massive problem on early Tumblr. And yeah, it is kind of funny to make fun of people who have conversations like this:
These people are living caricatures of legitimate social justice champions. They are the people that "SJW" was originally meant to mock. Self-important, super-sensitive, and group-thinky.
But it is 2017 now and the term is absolutely and positively never used to describe these irrelevant people and if you call somebody an SJW you are an idiot.
I'd rather have equality but not at the expense of other things