Great price.
*avatar quote*
Great price.
Should have fucking shipped with 1 TB. I HATE HATE HATE having an external drive hooked onto my console. It's so lame.
Both ps4/xb1 should have had 1tb from the start. 500gb is what the ps3 and 360 came with.
Waiting for the 1TB bundle with a Kinect for £799.
Have you not seen how ridiculously cheap the console is in the UK at the moment?
Hasn't been nearly cheap enough to tempt me.
To be honest, Kinect was the only real selling point of that console for me, and they've all but killed it dead so I can't imagine I'll ever get one, no matter what they sell it for.
Was just going by the usual $= conversions but I saw on reddit that the CoD AW bundle was priced high as a placeholder aswell at first, maybe the same here.Well, I doubt they will do $449, presumably it will replace the $349 sku, although perhaps $400 with Halo and maybe something else would be ok
MS is so frustrating as a console maker. I mean they purposely didn't allow upgradeable internal drives so they could do this as well. 500gb was too little in 2013, let alone still having that size well into 2015. Everything has to be their proprietary and branded junk. Whether it was their specific weird hard drive and holder on the launch 360, and then the slim, which they still tried to make sure you used theirs because of the plastic casing required.
I bet every single Xbox One owner is at or near the limit for their hard drives already. It wouldn't matter so much, but I can't even run a game off of disc alone. Has to be installed everytime before you play. So if I delete something and then have urge to replay it a month later, I need to free up space and install again. And no, I don't want to get an external drive and keep it attached my console all the time. That's a band-aid solution to the problem.
I'm glad Sony is doing an absolute number to Microsoft sales wise. Maybe they'll learn for next console or even the latter half of this gen.
MS is so frustrating as a console maker. I mean they purposely didn't allow upgradeable internal drives so they could do this as well. 500gb was too little in 2013, let alone still having that size well into 2015. Everything has to be their proprietary and branded junk. Whether it was their specific weird hard drive and holder on the launch 360, and then the slim, which they still tried to make sure you used theirs because of the plastic casing required.
I bet every single Xbox One owner is at or near the limit for their hard drives already. It wouldn't matter so much, but I can't even run a game off of disc alone. Has to be installed everytime before you play. So if I delete something and then have urge to replay it a month later, I need to free up space and install again. And no, I don't want to get an external drive and keep it attached my console all the time. That's a band-aid solution to the problem.
I'm glad Sony is doing an absolute number to Microsoft sales wise. Maybe they'll learn for next console or even the latter half of this gen.
There are many benefits to MS' external drive support over Sony's internal.
MS, and Nintendo are leading the pack on this feature.
Hasn't been nearly cheap enough to tempt me.
To be honest, Kinect was the only real selling point of that console for me, and they've all but killed it dead so I can't imagine I'll ever get one, no matter what they sell it for.
Both ps4/xb1 should have had 1tb from the start. 500gb is what the ps3 and 360 came with.
We have a winner.Sounds like the size of a hard drive they would need to turn it into a DVR for OTA TV, as well as being a gaming box.
There are many benefits to MS' external drive support over Sony's internal.
MS, and Nintendo are leading the pack on this feature.
So, Nintendo, then. Given they had the feature long before MS did.There are many benefits to MS' external drive support over Sony's internal.
MS, and Nintendo are leading the pack on this feature.
You can still buy it with Kinect....
All Kinect functions are still present and work.
MS is so frustrating as a console maker. I mean they purposely didn't allow upgradeable internal drives so they could do this as well. 500gb was too little in 2013, let alone still having that size well into 2015. Everything has to be their proprietary and branded junk. Whether it was their specific weird hard drive and holder on the launch 360, and then the slim, which they still tried to make sure you used theirs because of the plastic casing required.
I bet every single Xbox One owner is at or near the limit for their hard drives already. It wouldn't matter so much, but I can't even run a game off of disc alone. Has to be installed everytime before you play. So if I delete something and then have urge to replay it a month later, I need to free up space and install again. And no, I don't want to get an external drive and keep it attached my console all the time. That's a band-aid solution to the problem.
I'm glad Sony is doing an absolute number to Microsoft sales wise. Maybe they'll learn for next console or even the latter half of this gen.
Krakn3Dfx said:Many benefits? Examples of these many benefits?
The PS3 launched with two SKU's, a 20GB model and 60GB model, the Xbox 360 launched with a 20GB model.
The PS3 currently ships with a 500GB Hard drive disk and the Xbox 360 ships with a 250GB Hard drive disk.
Both the PS4 and Xbox One ship with a 500GB hard drive disk.
Can you really not think of any? Adding storage rather than replacing it and being able to take the external drive with installed games to a friend's house are pretty nice benefits IMO. I'm very happy MS went with the external solution rather than replaceable internal drives. Of course whynotboth.gif, but if I'm only getting one I much prefer external.Many benefits? Examples of these many benefits?
Both ps4/xb1 should have had 1tb from the start. 500gb is what the ps3 and 360 came with.
Can you really not think of any? Adding storage rather than replacing it and being able to take the external drive with installed games to a friend's house are pretty nice benefits IMO. I'm very happy MS went with the external solution rather than replaceable internal drives. Of course whynotboth.gif, but if I'm only getting one I much prefer external.
Yeah I couldn't remember what 360 ships with now. I wasn't comparing the new consoles to old console launches. Was comparing them to what you can get now.
The PS3 launched with two SKU's, a 20GB model and 60GB model, the Xbox 360 launched with a 20GB model.
The PS3 currently ships with a 500GB Hard drive disk and the Xbox 360 ships with a 250GB Hard drive disk.
Both the PS4 and Xbox One ship with a 500GB hard drive disk.
The PS3 launched with two SKU's, a 20GB model and 60GB model, the Xbox 360 launched with a 20GB model.
The PS3 currently ships with a 500GB Hard drive disk and the Xbox 360 ships with a 250GB Hard drive disk.
Both the PS4 and Xbox One ship with a 500GB hard drive disk.
I don't know how MS expects to sell some units in Europe with this price.
Xbox 360 Core launched with no hdd along with the 20GB Xbox 360
I disagree. Sony's implementation is better.
Also, Why not both?
Many benefits? Examples of these many benefits?
So, Nintendo, then. Given they had the feature long before MS did.
Did Sony actually do this first with the PS3?
A TB still isnt enough for this gen tbh.... you would still need to upgrade or by an external drive.
Both ps4/xb1 should have had 1tb from the start. 500gb is what the ps3 and 360 came with.
Not surprised.
The price of it should be the current price of the 500 GB model; Then make the 500 GB model $100 cheaper. That would be nice.