Bret BaierVerified @BretBaier
Some at CNN & NYT stood w/FOX News when the Obama admin attacked us & tried 2 exclude us-a WH gaggle should be open to all credentialed orgs
And now...where we are.
Bret BaierVerified @BretBaier
Some at CNN & NYT stood w/FOX News when the Obama admin attacked us & tried 2 exclude us-a WH gaggle should be open to all credentialed orgs
Umm from 1st amendment entry on wikipedia
The Free Press Clause protects the right of individuals to express themselves through publication and dissemination of information, ideas and opinions without interference, constraint or prosecution by the government.
See Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514 (2001)
I'm pretty sure news outlets can sue the government and argue this is interference and constraint from the government.
They've overstepped here. This is not going to go down well.
Yep, he's still rough around the edges when it comes to explaining why he does what he does, but it's his first month so he gets a pass.If Trump wants to act like a south american dictator, he should learn with us that you should call censorship "democratization of the media" instead of just flat out doing it.
It's a nice idea, but it doesn't really hold water. By this logic, you'd have to let anyone into a press briefing who calls themselves a journalist, otherwise you're "blocking the press."Freedom of the press clause is to prevent the government from interfering with the distribution of information and opinions. Couldn't this technically be seen as the WH interfering with the distribution of information by blocking traditional reporting outlets?
Yeah, while I fear for the future of our democracy (and lives in general) I don't feel a bit sorry for the media. They invited this by putting ratings above decency and honesty during the campaign. Next time don't spend the last two weeks of a presidential campaign reporting almost exclusively on right wing propaganda in order to create a fake horse race and drum up viewership.CNN had a hand in normalizing this buffoon. Now they're getting their reward.
President Snowflake seems like a more and more apt term for Trump than any others I've heard yet.
CNN had a hand in normalizing this buffoon. Now they're getting their reward.
Umm from 1st amendment entry on wikipedia
The Free Press Clause protects the right of individuals to express themselves through publication and dissemination of information, ideas and opinions without interference, constraint or prosecution by the government.
See Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514 (2001)
I'm pretty sure news outlets can sue the government and argue this is interference and constraint from the government.
If Republicans have any morals
They can't ask questions though which is quite a big thing.
Well the media played themselves... going for the high ratings for Donald to now being irrelevant. Dumbasses
This is the time Twitter should step up and block any communications from anyone connected to the Trump regime.
How can the Nazis stand by and watch Nazi occurrences?This is literally nazi shit. How can republicans stand by?
They can't ask questions though which is quite a big thing.
Well the media played themselves... going for the high ratings for Donald to now being irrelevant. Dumbasses
Umm from 1st amendment entry on wikipedia
The Free Press Clause protects the right of individuals to express themselves through publication and dissemination of information, ideas and opinions without interference, constraint or prosecution by the government.
See Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514 (2001)
I'm pretty sure news outlets can sue the government and argue this is interference and constraint from the government.
They're not being prevented from reporting on what happens there, they're just being prevented from entry. Again, that's fucked up but not strictly illegal.
I'm not sure if you meant this as a rhetorical question, but it's so it gets buried over the weekend and people forget about it by Monday I assume. It would also be harder to quickly react with legal action if they do something awful on a Friday, though people managed to at least get something done with the immigration order.Why does the Trump administration always do crazy shit on Friday?
Classic business tactic. Release bad news on a Friday, hope investors will forget about it by Monday when the markets open. But... it doesn't exactly work when not applied to a publicly-traded company.Why does the Trump administration always do crazy shit on Friday?
Umm from 1st amendment entry on wikipedia
The Free Press Clause protects the right of individuals to express themselves through publication and dissemination of information, ideas and opinions without interference, constraint or prosecution by the government.
See Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514 (2001)
I'm pretty sure news outlets can sue the government and argue this is interference and constraint from the government.
Why does the Trump administration always do crazy shit on Friday?
The stupid part is that the press briefing provides an opportunity for the White House to get their own narrative out there (and bash the press). Can't do that as easily if nobody is covering you. (No, not everybody reads alt-right sources.)
Why does the Trump administration always do crazy shit on Friday?
Why does the Trump administration always do crazy shit on Friday?
The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and Politico were also excluded from the meeting, which is known as a gaggle and is less formal than the televised Q-and-A session in the White House briefing room.
The Associated Press and Time magazine boycotted the briefing because of how it was handled. The White House Correspondents Association is protesting.
The conservative media organizations Breitbart News, The Washington Times and One America News Network were allowed in.
Too busy banning people who call nazis out.
Umm from 1st amendment entry on wikipedia
The Free Press Clause protects the right of individuals to express themselves through publication and dissemination of information, ideas and opinions without interference, constraint or prosecution by the government.
See Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514 (2001)
I'm pretty sure news outlets can sue the government and argue this is interference and constraint from the government.
Let's see Jeff Lord try to defend this.
....Actually, let's not.
The stupid part is that the press briefing provides an opportunity for the White House to get their own narrative out there (and bash the press). Can't do that as easily if nobody is covering you. (No, not everybody reads alt-right sources.)
This could be interpreted as government interference and constraint, however. I'm not a judge though
This is the time Twitter should step up and block any communications from anyone connected to the Trump regime.
I am also hoping foreign press like the BBC boycott the White House. In fact I want no Press anywhere to publish ANYTHING from the White House. It won't happen but I can dream.
I am also hoping foreign press like the BBC boycott the White House. In fact I want no Press anywhere to publish ANYTHING from the White House. It won't happen but I can dream.